High-resolution spectroscopy of methyl 4-hydroxycinnamate and its hydrogen-bonded water complex

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 112, Issue 14, 2008, Pages 4427-4434

  De Groot, Mattijs ^a   Gromov, Evgeniy V ^b,c   Köppel, Horst ^b   Buma, Wybren Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c IRKUTSK STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; CHROMOPHORES; COMPLEXATION; ELECTRIC EXCITATION; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; HYDROGEN; MODAL ANALYSIS; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES;

EMISSION SPECTRUMS; EXCITED SINGLET STATES; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; GAS PHASE; HIGH RESOLUTIONS; HIGH-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY; PHOTOACTIVE YELLOW PROTEIN (PYP); QUANTUM CHEMICAL (QC) CALCULATIONS; SPECTROSCOPIC PROPERTIES; SPECTROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES;

EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY;

CINNAMIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHYL TRANS P HYDROXYCINNAMATE; METHYL TRANS-P-HYDROXYCINNAMATE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HYDROGEN BOND; INFRARED SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CINNAMATES; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, INFRARED; WATER;

EID: 46449096454     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp7101308     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Hellingwerf, K. J.; Hendriks, J.; Gensch, T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 1082.
2. Lee, I.; Lee, W.; Zewail, A. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103, 258.
3. Nielsen, I. B.; Boyé-Péronne, S.; El Ghazaly, M. O. A.; Kristensen, M. B.; Nielsen, S. B.; Andersen, L. H. Biophys. J. 2005, 89, 2597.
4. Ryan, W. L.; Gordon, D. J.; Levy, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6194.
5. Kort, R.; Vonk, H.; Xu, X.; Hoff, W. D.; Crielaard, W.; Hellingwerf, K. J. FEBS Lett. 1996, 382, 73.
6. de Groot, M.; Buma, W. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 6135.
7. de Groot, M.; Buma, W. J.; Gromov, E. V.; Burghardt, I.; Koppel, H.; Cederbaum, L. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 204303.
8. Gromov, E. V.; Burghardt, I.; Köppel, H.; Cederbaum, L. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 4623.
9. 3 fragment. The latter is, however, not the case for p-coumaric thioacid.
10. Gromov, E. V.; Burghardt, I.; Köppel, H.; Hynes, J. T.; Cederbaum, L. S. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2007, 190, 241.
11. Ko, C.; Levine, B.; Toniolo, A.; Manohar, L.; Olsen, S.; Werner, H.; Martínez, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12710.
12. Levine, B. G.; Ko, C.; Quenneville, J.; Martinez, T. J. Mol. Phys. 2006, 104, 1039.
13. Rijkenberg, R. A.; Bebelaar, D.; Buma, W. J.; Hofstraat, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 2446.
14. Treutler, O.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 346.
15. Von, Arnim, M.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Comp. Chem. 1998, 19, 1746.
16. Deglmann, P.; Furche, F. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 9535.
17. Deglmann, P.; Furche, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 362, 511.
18. De Groot, M.; Buma, W. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 435, 224.
19. De Groot, M.; Buma, W. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 420, 459.
20. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822.
21. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098.
22. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
23. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
24. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1372.
25. Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502.
26. Buma, W. J.; Zerbetto, F. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 10492.
27. Doktorov, E. V.; Malkin, I. A.; Man'ko, A. V. I. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1977, 64, 302.
28. Zwier, J. M.; Wiering, P. G.; Brouwer, A. M.; Bebelaar, D.; Buma, W. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11523.
29. GAMESS version, June 27, 2005 (R2).
30. Schmidt, M. W.; Baldridge, K. K.; Boatz, J. A.; Elbert, S. T.; Gordon, M. S.; Jensen, J. H.; Koseki, S.; Matsunaga, N.; Nguyen, K. A.; Su, S.; Windus, T. L.; Dupuis, M.; Montgomery Jr, J. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1347.
31. Sekino, H.; Bartlett, R. J. Int. J. Quantum Chem., Quantum Chem. Symp. 1984, 18, 255.
32. Werner, H.-J.; Knowles, P. J.; Lindh, R.; Manby, F. R.; Schütz, M.; Celani, P.; Korona, T.; Rauhut, G.; Amos, R. D.; Bernhardsson, A.; Berning, A.; Cooper, D. L.; Deegan, M. J. O.; Dobbyn, A. J.; Eckert, F.; Hampel, C.; Hetzer, G.; Lloyd, A.W.; McNicholas, S. J.; Meyer, W.; Mura, M. E.; Nicklass, A.; Palmieri, P.; Pitzer, R.; Schumann, U.; Stoll, H.; Stone, A. J.; Tarroni, R.; Thorsteinsson, T. MOLPRO, version 2006.1, a package of ab initio programs; see http://www.molpro.net.
33. 10 calculations, however, imply that the complete explanation involves the switching of the V and V states upon deprotonation.
34. Sobolewski, A. L.; Domcke, W. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 9275.
35. Sobolewski, A. L.; Domcke, W.; Dedonder-Lardeux, C.; Jouvet, C. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 1093.
36. s, symmetry of the bare chromophore is preserved.
37. Zwier, T. S. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1996, 47, 205.
38. Sur, A.; Johnson, P. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 1206.
39. Espagne, A.; Paik, D. H.; Changenet-Barret, P.; Martin, M. M.; Zewail, A. H. ChemPhysChem 2006, 7, 1717.
40. An alternative explanation is that the bands of the two conformations exactly superimpose. It would be hard to believe that this would occur for every single band, and this explanation is therefore rejected.
41. Schuetz, M.; Buergi, T.; Leutwyler, S.; Fischer, T. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 3763.
42. Stanley, R. J.; Castleman, A. W.; Jr. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94, 7744.