Quality-related variables at hepatological websites

Digestive and Liver Disease

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 533-538

  Fraquelli, M ^a   Conte, D ^a   Camma C ^b   Casazza, G ^c   Di Bona, D ^b   Rebulla, P ^a   Prati, D ^a,d  

^a FONDAZIONE IRCCS CA GRANDA OSPEDALE MAGGIORE POLICLINICO   (Italy)

^b CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d A MANZONI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Caroli's disease; Chronic hepatitis; Hemochromatosis; Internet

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CAROLI DISEASE; CHRONIC HEPATITIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; HEMOCHROMATOSIS; INTERNET; LIVER DISEASE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NOMENCLATURE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; HUMAN; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; CAROLI DISEASE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; HEMOCHROMATOSIS; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIVER DISEASES; LOGISTIC MODELS; WRITING;

EID: 4644367216     PISSN: 15908658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, White J, Andrews K, Kennett RL, et al. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. J Am Med Assoc 2000;283:1600-6.
2. Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, Maxfield A. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. Br Med J 1999;318:647-9.
3. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, et al. Health information on the internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. J Am Med Assoc 2001;285:2612-21.
4. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981. p. 17-34.
5. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
6. Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey. Br Med J 2000;321:1511-5.
7. Griffiths KM, Christensen H. The quality and accessibility of Australian depression sites on the world wide web. Med J Aust 2002;176:S97-104.
8. Sandvik H. Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence. Br Med J 1999;319:29-32.
9. Meric F, Bernstam EV, Mirza NQ, Hunt KK, Ames FC, Ross MI, et al. Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. Br Med J 2002;324:577-81.
10. Craige M, Loader B, Burrows R, Muncer S. Reliability of health information on the internet: an examination of expert ratings. J Med Internet Res 2002;4:2.
11. Gronbaek K, Christensen PB, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Federspiel BH, Hage E, Jensen OJ, et al. Interobserver variation in interpretation of serial liver biopsies from patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat 2002;9:443-9.
12. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 2002;287:2691-700.
13. Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? J Am Med Assoc 1998;279:611.