Two probabilistic life-cycle maintenance models for deteriorating civil infrastructures

Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 345-359

  Van Noortwijk, Jan M ^a,b   Frangopol, Dan M ^c  

^a HKV CONSULTANTS   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridge management; Deterioration; Gamma process; Life cycle costing; Lifetime extension; Maintenance optimisation; Renewal theory; Simulation

Indexed keywords

BRIDGES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; DETERIORATION; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

BRIDGE MANAGEMENT; GAMMA PROCESS; LIFE-CYCLE COSTING; LIFETIME EXTENSION; MAINTENANCE OPTIMIZATION; RENEWAL THEORY;

CIVIL ENGINEERING;

EID: 4644367096     PISSN: 02668920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. van Noortwijk J.M. Optimal replacement decisions for structures under stochastic deterioration. Nowak A.S. Proceedings of the eighth IFIP WG 7.5 working conference on reliability and optimization of structural systems, Kraków, Poland, 1998. 1998;273-280 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
2. Bakker J.D., van der Graaf H.J., van Noortwijk J.M. Model of lifetime-extending maintenance. Forde M.C. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on structural faults and repair, London, United Kingdom, 1999. 1999;Engineering Technics Press, Edinburgh.
3. Frangopol D.M. A probabilistic model based on eight random variables for preventive maintenance of bridges. Presented at the progress meeting optimum maintenance strategies for different bridge types. 1998;Highways Agency, London.
4. Frangopol DM. (2000). Optimum maintenance strategies for different bridge types: project description and steel/concrete composite bridges, vol. 1, Final report to the Highways Agency, London, UK.
5. Frangopol DM. (2003). Preventative Maintenance Strategies for Bridge Groups-Analysis, Volume 1, Final Report to the Highways Agency, London, U.K.
6. Frangopol D.M. Life-cycle cost analysis for bridges. Bridge safety and reliability. 1999;ASCE, Reston, Virginia. p. 210-36.
7. Frangopol D.M., Das P.C. Management of bridge stocks based on future reliability and maintenance costs. Bridge Design, Construction, and Maintenance. 1999;The Institution of Civil Engineers, Thomas Telford, London. p. 45-58.
8. Frangopol DM, Gharaibeh ES, Kong JS, Miyake M. (2000). Optimal network-level bridge maintenance planning based on minimum expected cost. J Transport Res Board, Transportation Research Record, No. 1696, vol. 2, National Academy Press, p. 26-33.
9. Frangopol D.M., Kong J.S., Gharaibeh E.S. Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges. J Comput Civil Engng ASCE. 15:(1):2001;27-34.
10. Kong J.S., Frangopol D.M., Gharaibeh E.S. Life prediction of highway bridges with or without preventive maintenance. Proceedings of the 8th ASCE special conference on probabilistic mechanics and structural reliability. 2000;University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana. July 24-26, 6 pages on CD-ROM.
11. Rijkswaterstaat. Workshop on optimal maintenance of structures, October 4-6, 2000, Delft, The Netherlands. 2000;Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Civil Engineering Division, Utrecht.
12. Das P.C. Prioritization of bridge maintenance needs. Frangopol D.M. Case studies in optimal design and maintenance planning of civil infrastructure systems. 1999;26-44 ASCE, Reston, Virginia.
13. McCall J.J. Maintenance policies for stochastically failing equipment: a survey. Manage Sci. 11:1965;493-524.
14. Barlow R.E., Proschan F. Mathematical theory of reliability. 1965;Wiley, New York.
15. Dekker R. Applications of maintenance optimization models: a review and analysis. Reliability Engng Syst Saf. 51:1996;229-240.
16. Dekker R., Scarf P.A. On the impact of optimisation models in maintenance decision making: the state of the art. Reliability Engng Syst Saf. 60:1998;111-119.
17. van Noortwijk J.M., Peerbolte E.B. Optimal sand nourishment decisions. J Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Engng. 126:(1):2000;30-38.
18. Feller W. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. vol. 1:1950;Wiley, New York.
19. Karlin S., Taylor H.M. A first course in stochastic processes. 2nd ed. 1975;Academic Press, San Diego.
20. van Noortwijk J.M. Explicit formulas for the variance of discounted life-cycle cost. Reliability Engng Syst Saf. 80:(2):2003;185-195.
21. Rackwitz R. Optimizing systematically renewed structures. Reliability Engng Syst Saf. 73:(3):2001;269-279.
22. van Noortwijk J.M., Klatter H.E. Optimal inspection decisions for the block mats of the Eastern-Scheldt barrier. Reliability Engng Syst Saf. 65:(3):1999;203-211.
23. van Noortwijk J.M. Optimal maintenance decisions on the basis of uncertain failure probabilities. J Qual Maintenance Engng. 6:(2):2000;113-122.
24. van Noortwijk J.M., Cooke R.M., Kok M. A Bayesian failure model based on isotropic deterioration. Eur J Operation Res. 82:(2):1995;270-282.
25. van Noortwijk J.M., Kok M., Cooke R.M. Optimal maintenance decisions for the sea-bed protection of the Eastern-Scheldt barrier. Cooke R., Mendel M., Vrijling H. Engineering probabilistic design and maintenance for flood protection. 1997;25-56 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
26. van Noortwijk J.M., van Gelder P.H.A.J.M. Optimal maintenance decisions for berm breakwaters. Struct Saf. 18:(4):1996;293-309.
27. Thompson P.D., Small E.P., Johnson M., Marshall A.R. The Pontis bridge management system. Struct Engng Int, IABSE. 8:(4):1998;303-308.
28. Hawk H., Small E.P. The BRIDGIT bridge management system. Struct Engng Int, IABSE. 8:(4):1998;309-314.
29. Frangopol D.M. Reliability deterioration and lifetime maintenance cost optimization. Keynote lecture in proceedings of the first international ASRANet colloquium on integrating structural reliability analysis with advanced structural analysis, July 8-10, 2002, Glasgow, Scotland. 2002.
30. Kong J.S., Frangopol D.M. Life-cycle reliability-based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges. J Struct Engng. 129:(6):2003;818-828.
31. Frangopol DM, Gharaibeh ES, Kong JS, Miyake M. (2000). Optimal network-level bridge maintenance planning based on minimum expected cost, J Transport Res Board, Transportation Research Record 1696, vol. 2, National Academy Press, p. 26-33.
32. Maunsell Ltd. and Transport Research Laboratory (1998). Strategic review of bridge maintenance costs: Report on 1997/98 Review, Draft Report, The Highways Agency, London.
33. Klatter H.E., van Noortwijk J.M., Vrisou van Eck N. Bridge management in the Netherlands; prioritisation based on network performance. Casas J.R., Frangopol D.M., Nowak A.S. First international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management (IABMAS), Barcelona, Spain, 14-17 July 2002. 2002;International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), Barcelona.
34. Frangopol D.M., Kong J.S. Bridge management based on reliability states and whole life cost: from theory to implementation. Chang F.K. Structural health monitoring-the demands and challenges. 2001;403-419 CRC Press, Boca Raton.
35. Frangopol D.M., Kong J.S., Gharaibeh E.S. Bridge management based on lifetime reliability and whole life costing: the next generation. Ryall M.J., Parke G.A.R., Harding J.E. Bridge management four. 2000;392-399 Thomas Telford, London.