Magnetic resonance imaging to detect acute cerebral events in on-pump and hybrid-pump patients

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 217-220

  Kherani, Aftab R ^a   Lazar, Ronald M ^a   Xydas, Steve ^a   Mazzeo, Pamela A ^a   Fal, Jennifer M ^a   Mongero, Linda ^a   Vigilance, Deon W ^a   Morgan, Jeffrey A ^a   Cheema, Faisal H ^a   Burton, Elizabeth H ^a   Moss, Garrett W ^a   Oz, Mehmet C ^a  

^a College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STROKE; SYMPTOM; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 4644362928     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20041021     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Diegeler A, Hirsh R., Schneider F, et al. 2000. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1162-6.
2. Mongero LB. 2003. Size is at the heart of the matter: update on advanced circulatory support technology. Heart Surg Forum 6:112-3.
3. Mueller XM, Jegger D, Augstburger M, Horisberger J, Godar G, von Segesser LK. 2002. A new concept of integrated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:840-6.
4. Mueller XM, Tevaearai HT, Jegger D, von Segesser LK. 2003. Air filtering capacity of an integrated cardiopulmonary bypass unit. ASAIO J 49:365-9.
5. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, et al. 2003. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:797-808.
6. Restrepo L, Wityk RJ, Grega MA, et al. 2002. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before and after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Stroke 33:2909-15.
7. Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, et al. 1996. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 335:1857-63.
8. Rubens FD, Ruel M, Lavallee G, et al. 1999. Circuits with surface modifying additive alter the haemodynamic response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:353-8.
9. Taylor KM. 1998. Brain damage during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 65(suppl):S20-6.
10. van Dijk D, Jansen EWL, Hijman R, et al. 2002. Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 287:1405-12.
11. Zamvar V, Williams D, Hall J, et al. 2002. Assessment of neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: prospective randomized controlled trial. British Med J 325:1268-72.