Genetic mappings in artificial genomes

Theory in Biosciences

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 125-137

  Komosinski, Maciej ^a   Ulatowski, Szymon ^a  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Genetic mapping; Genotype; Phenotype; Simulation; Translation; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE ACTIVITY; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CODE; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; PHENOTYPE; RNA TRANSLATION;

PHENES;

EID: 4644348153     PISSN: 14317613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.thbio.2004.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Albert, J., 1999. Computational modeling of an early evolutionary stage of the nervous system. BioSystems 54, 77-90.
2. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., Lipman, D.J., 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25 (17), 3389-3402.
3. Balakrishnan, K., Honavar, V., 1995. Evolutionary design of neural architectures: a preliminary taxonomy and guide to literature. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
4. Barlow, M., Galloway, J., Abbass, H.A., 2002. Mining evolution through visualization. In: Alife VIII: Workshop Proceedings, pp. 103-110.
5. Bentley, P., 1999. Evolutionary Design by Computers. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.
6. Bentley, P., Kumar, S., 1999. Three ways to grow designs: a comparison of embryogenies for an evolutionary design problem. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 35-43.
7. Channon, A., 1996. The evolutionary emergence route to artificial intelligence. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.
8. Cliff, D., Miller, G.F., 1996. Co-evolution of pursuit and evasion II: simulation methods and results. In: Maes, P. (Ed.), From Animals to Animals IV, Third European Conference on Artificial Life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 506-515.
9. de Garis, H., 1992. Genetic programming. GenNets, artificial nervous systems, artificial embryos. Ph.D. Thesis, ATR Human Information Processing Research Laboratories, Brain Builder Group, Evolutionary Systems Department, Brussels University, Kyoto, Japan.
10. de Garis, H., Korkin, M., 2000. The CAM-brain machine (CBM): an FPGA based tool for evolving a 75 million neuron artificial brain to control a life sized kitten robot. Autonomous Robots Journal, Special Issue on Personal Robotics.
11. Dellaert, F., Beer, R.D., 1996. A developmental model for the evolution of complete autonomous agents. In: Maes, P., Mataric, M.J., Meyer, J.-A., Pollack, J.B., Wilson, S.W. (Eds.), From Animals to Animals. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior SAB '96. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 393-401.
12. Eggenberger, P., 1997. Evolving morphologies of simulated 3D organisms based on differential gene expression. In: Husbands, P., Harvey, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Artificial Life ECAL97, Complex Adaptive Systems Series. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Funes, P., Pollack, J.B., 1998. Evolutionary body building: adaptive physical designs for robots. Artificial Life 4 (4), 337-357.
14. Gruau, F., Whitley, D., Pyeatt, L., 1996. A comparison between cellular encoding and direct encoding for genetic neural networks. In: Koza, J.R., Goldberg, D.E., Fogel, D.B., Riolo, R.R. (Eds.). Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, Genetic Programming 1996. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 81-89.
15. Hornby, G.S., 2003. Generative representations for evolutionary design automation. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Brandeis University.
16. Jakobi, N., Quinn, M., 1998. Some problems (and a few solutions) for open-ended evolutionary robotics. In: Husbands, P., Meyer, J.-A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Evolutionary Robotics: EvoRobot98. Springer, Berlin.
17. Kitano, H., 1990. Designing neural networks using genetic algorithms with graph generation system. Complex Systems 4, 461-476.
18. Komosinski, M., 2003. The Framsticks system: versatile simulator of 3D agents and their evolution. Kybernetes: The International Journal of Systems & Cybernetics 32 (1/2; Special Issue on Artificial Life Software), 156-173.
19. Komosinski, M., Rotaru-Varga, A., 2001. Comparison of different genotype encodings for simulated 3D agents. Artificial Life Journal 7 (4), 395-418.
20. Komosinski, M., Ulatowski, S., Framsticks web site, http://www.frams. alife.pl.
21. Komosinski, M., Koczyk, G., Kubiak, M., 2001. On estimating similarity of artificial and real organisms. Theory in Biosciences 120 (3-4), 271-286.
22. Kuscu, I., Thornton, C., 1994. Design of artificial neural networks using genetic algorithms: review and prospect. Technical Report, School of Cognitive and Computing Science, University of Sussex, ftp:// ftp.cogs.susx.ac.uk/pub/ reports/csrp/csrp319.ps.Z.
23. Lichtensteiger, L., Eggenberger, P., 1999. Evolving the morphology of a compound eye on a robot. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots (Eurobot '99), 6-8 September 1999.
24. Lipson, H., Pollack, J.B., 2000. Automatic design and manufacture of robotic lifeforms. Nature 406 (6799), 974-978.
25. Sikora, S., Steinberg, D., Lattaud, C., 2000. Integration of simulation tools in on-line virtual worlds. In: Heudin, J.-C. (Ed.), Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Virtual Worlds (VW2000), LNAI 1834, Paris, France, July 2000. Springer, Berlin, pp. 32-43.
26. Sims, K., 1994. Evolving 3D morphology and behavior by competition. In: Brooks, R.A., Maes, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Life. MIT Press, Boston, MA, pp. 28-39.
27. Stanley, K., Miikkulainen, R., 2004. Competitive coevolution through evolutionary complexification. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21, 63-100.
28. Stanley, K.O., Miikkulainen, R., 2003. A taxonomy for artificial embryogeny. Artificial Life 9 (2), 93-130.