|
Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages 40-45
|
Reasons for caution when evaluating health care interventions using non-randomised study designs
|
Author keywords
Bias; Clinical trials; Cohort studies; Confounding; Residual confounding
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYTICAL ERROR;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
CONFERENCE PAPER;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
HEALTH SERVICE;
METHODOLOGY;
PREDICTION;
RANDOMIZATION;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
COHORT STUDIES;
CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INTERVENTION STUDIES;
MALE;
PATIENT SELECTION;
QUALITY CONTROL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
SELECTION BIAS;
|
EID: 4644347319
PISSN: 14247364
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1159/000080575 Document Type: Conference Paper |
Times cited : (12)
|
References (6)
|