An investigation of sdof models for large mass impact on sandwich composites

Composites Part B: Engineering

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 135-142

  Anderson, Todd A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

A. Foam; A. Honeycomb; B. Impact behavior; D. Mechanical testing

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; DAMPING; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ENERGY DISSIPATION; FOAMS; HONEYCOMB STRUCTURES; IMPACT TESTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MAXWELL EQUATIONS; MECHANICAL TESTING; SANDWICH STRUCTURES; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

COMPOSITE SANDWICH LAMINATES; INTERNAL DAMAGES; POLYMER COMPOSITES;

LAMINATED COMPOSITES;

EID: 4644346558     PISSN: 13598368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Olsson R. Mass criterion for wave controlled impact response of composite plates. Comp Part A 2000;31:879-87.
2. Oplinger DW, Sleptz JM. Impact tolerance of graphite/epoxy sandwich panels. In: Greszczuk LB, editor. ASTM STP 568. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing Materials; 1975, p. 30-48.
3. Rhodes MD. Impact fracture of composite sandwich structures. AIAA Paper 75-748 In: Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/SAE 16th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. New York: AIAA; 1975.
4. Abrate S. Modeling of impacts on composite structures. Compos Struct 2001;51(2):129-38.
5. Abrate S. Impact Compos Struct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
6. Abrate S. Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings. Appl Mech Rev 1997;50:69-82.
7. Anderson TA, Madenci E, Burton WS, Fish JC. Analytical solution of finite-geometry panels under transient surface loading. Int J Sol Struct 1998;35(12):1219-39.
8. Lee JD, Du S, Liebowitz H. Three-dimensional finite element and dynamic analysis of composite laminate subjected to impact. Comput Struct 1984;19(5-6):807-13.
9. Olsson R. Impact response of orthotropic composite plates predicted from a one-parameter differential equation. AIAA J 1992;30(6): 1587-96.
10. Olsson R. Closed form prediction of peak load and delamination onset under small mass impact. Compos Struct 2003;59:341-9.
11. Shivakumar KN, Elber W, Illg W. Prediction of impact force and duration due to low-velocity impact on circular composite laminates. J Appl Mech 1985;52:674-80.
12. Bucinell RB, Nuismer RJ, Koury JL. Response of composite plates to quasi-static impact events. In: O'Brien TK, editor. ASTM STP 1110. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing Materials; 1991, p. 528-49.
13. Abot JL, Daniel IM. Composite sandwich beams under low-velocity impact. AIAA 2001-1186 In: Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA/AS-ME/ASCE/AHS/ASC SDM Conference, Seattle, April 2001 2001.
14. Found MS, Hqward IC, Paran AP. Interpretation of signals from dropweight impact tests. Compos Struct 1998;42(4):353-63.
15. Aymerich F, Orru PF, Priolo P. Prediction of the dynamic response of impacted composite laminates. Key Eng Mater 2002;221-222: 197-208.
16. Anderson TA, Madenci E. Graphite/epoxy foam sandwich panels under quasi-static indentation. Eng Fract Mech 2000;67(4):329-44.
17. Ambur DR, Prasad CB, Waters WA. A dropped-weight apparatus for low-speed impact testing of composite structures. Exp Mech 1995;35: 77-82.
18. Anderson TA, Madenci E. Experimental investigation of low-velocity impact characteristics of sandwich composites. Compos Struct 2000; 50(3):239-47.