CASSM and cognitive walkthrough: Usability issues with ticket vending machines

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 307-320

  Connell, Iain ^a   Blandford, Ann ^a   Green, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TICKET ISSUING MACHINES; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

LABORATORY TESTING; USABILITY EVALUATION METHODS (UEM); USABILITY INSPECTION METHODS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 4644344896     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01449290410001773463     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BAILEY, R. W., ALLAN, R. W. and RAIELLO, P. 1992, Usability testing vs. heuristic evaluation: a head-to-head comparison. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, 1992, Volume 1 (Human Factors Society), pp. 409-413.
2. BLANDFORD, A. E. and CONNELL, I. W. (2004a). CASSM Taxonomy of User-Interface-System Dependencies plus Example Analyses. Available (posted March 2004) at: http://www.uclic.ucl.ac.uk/annb/taxonomy.pdf
3. BLANDFORD, A. E. and CONNELL, I. W. (2004b). Cognitive Walkthrough of London Underground Ticket Vending Machines. Available (posted March 2004) at: http:// www.clic.ucl.ac.uk/annb/cw.pdf
4. BLANDFORD, A. E. and GREEN, T. R. G. 1997, OSM: An ontology-based approach to usability evaluation. In Proceedings of an International Workshop on Representations in Software Development, Queen Mary and Westfield College, July 1997, pp. 82-91.
5. BLANDFORD, A. E. and GREEN, T. R. G. 2001, From tasks to conceptual structures: misfit analysis. In J. Vanderdonckt, A. Blandford and P. Gray (eds) People and Computers XV-Interaction Without Frontiers (Volume II), joint proceedings of HCI 2001 and IHM 2001, Lille, September 2001. (Toulouse: Cepadues-Editions), pp. 113-116.
6. BLANDFORD, A. E., WONG, B. L. W., CONNELL, I. W. and GREEN, T. R. G. 2002, Multiple viewpoints on computer supported team work: a case study on ambulance dispatch. In X. Faulkner, J. Finlay and F. D. Étienne (eds) People and Computers XVI, proceedings of HCI 2002, London, September 2002. (London: Springer-Verlag), pp. 139-156.
7. CHRISTIE, B., SCANE, R. and COLLYER, J. 1995, Evaluation of human-computer interaction at the user interface to advanced IT systems. In J. R. Wilson and E. N. Corlett (eds) Evaluation of Human Work: a Practical Ergonomics Methodology, 2nd edition. (London: Taylor & Francis), pp. 310-356.
8. COCKTON, G. and WOOLRYCH, A. 2001, Understanding inspection methods: lessons from an assessment of heuristic evaluation. In J. Vanderdonckt, A. Blandford and P. Gray (eds) People and Computers XV - Interaction Without Frontiers, joint proceedings of HCI 2001 and IHM 2001, Lille, September 2001. (Toulouse: Cepadues-Editions), pp. 171-191.
9. COCKTON, G., WOOLRYCH, A., HALL, L. and HINDMARCH, M. 2003, Changing analysts' tunes: the surprising impact of a new instrument for usability inspection method assessment. In E. O'Neill, P. Palanque and P. Johnson (eds) People and Computers XVII - Designing for Society, proceedings of HCI 2003, Bath, September 2003. (London: Springer), pp. 145-161.
10. CONNELL, I. W. 1998, Error analysis of ticket vending machines: comparing analytic and empirical data. Ergonomics, 41(7), 927-961.
11. CONNELL, I. W., GREEN, T. R. G. and BLANDFORD, A. E. 2003, Ontological Sketch Models: highlighting user-system misfits. In E. O'Neill, P. Palanque and P. Johnson (eds) People and Computers XVII-Designing for Society, proceedings of HCI 2003, Bath, September 2003. (London: Springer), pp. 163-178.
12. CUOMO, D. L. and BOWEN, C. D. 1994, Understanding usability issues addressed by three user-system interface evaluation techniques. Interacting with Computers, 6(1), 86-108.
13. DESURVIRE, H. W. 1994, Faster, cheaper!! Are usability inspection methods as effective as empirical testing? In J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack (eds) Usability Inspection Methods. (New York: John Wiley & Sons), pp. 173-201.
14. DESURVIRE, H. W., KONDZIELA, J. M. and ATWOOD, M. E. (1992), What is gained and lost when using evaluation methods other than empirical testing. In A. Monk, D. Diaper and M. D. Harrison (eds) People and Computers VII, proceedings of HCI '92, York, September 1992. British Computer Society Conference Series 5. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 173-201.
15. GRAY, W. D. and SALZMAN, M. C. 1998, Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(3), 203-261.
16. HERTZUM, M. and JACOBSEN, N. E. 2001, The evaluator effect: a chilling fact about usability evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4), 421-443.
17. HOLLNAGEL, E. 1993, The phenotype of erroneous actions. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 1 -32.
18. JOHN, B. E. and MARKS, S. J. 1997, Tracking the effectiveness of usability evaluation methods. Behaviour & Information Technology, 16(4/5), 188-202.
19. KARAT, C.-M. 1994, A comparison of user interface evaluation methods. In J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack (eds) Usability Inspection Methods (New York: John Wiley & Sons), pp. 203-233.
20. KARAT, J. 1997, User-centered software evaluation methodologies. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer and P. Prabhu (eds) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edition. (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.), pp. 689-704.
21. LEWIS, C. and WHARTON, C. 1997, Cognitive walkthroughs. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer and P. Prabhu (eds) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edition. (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.), pp. 717-732.
22. LEWIS, C., POLSON, P., WHARTON, C. and RIEMAN, J. 1990, Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. In J. C. Chew and J. Whiteside (eds) Empowering People: CHI '90 Conference Proceedings, ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Seattle, April 1990 (Special issue of the SIGCHI Bulletin). (Seattle: Addison-Wesley), pp. 235-242.
23. NIELSEN, J. 1994, Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack (eds) Usability Inspection Methods (New York: John Wiley & Sons), pp. 25-62.
24. NISBETT, R. E. and WILSON, T. D. 1977, Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, May 1977, 84(3), 231-259.
25. NORMAN, D. A. 1986, Cognitive engineering. In D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (eds) User Centred System Design (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), pp. 31-62.
26. POLSON, P. G., LEWIS, C., RIEMAN, J. and WHARTON, C. 1992, Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(5), 741-773.
27. SEARS, A. 1997, Heuristic walkthroughs: finding the problems without the noise. International journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3), 213-234.