Clinical significance of preserving spontaneous QRS wave in the therapy of DDD pacing for sick sinus syndrome

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1212-1216

  Mani, Hiroki ^a   Shirayama, Takeshi ^a   Suzaki, Yoko ^a   Sakatani, Tomohiko ^a   Sakamoto, Takashi ^a   Yamamura, Midori ^a   Matsubara, Hiroaki ^a   Taniwaki, Masafumi ^a  

^a KYOTO PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Atrioventricular delay; Brain natriuretic peptide; Dual chamber pacemaker; Sick sinus syndrome

Indexed keywords

BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE;

ADULT; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; BLOOD SAMPLING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DUAL CHAMBER PACEMAKER; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING; FEMALE; HEART ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART ATRIUM PACING; HEART FUNCTION; HUMAN; M MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; QRS COMPLEX; QUALITY OF LIFE; SICK SINUS SYNDROME;

AGED; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; CARDIOMYOPATHIES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, PULSED; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE, BRAIN; SICK SINUS SYNDROME;

EID: 4644342541     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00611.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Nitsch J, Seiderer M, Bull U, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular performance by radionuclide ventriculography in patients with atrioventricular versus ventricular demand pacemakers. Am Heart J 1984; 107:906-911.
2. Romero LR, Haffajee CI, Levin W, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of ventricular function and volumes during atrioventricular sequential and ventricular pacing. PACE 1984; 7:10-17.
3. Ishikawa T, Kimura K, Yoshimura H, et al. Acute changes in left atrial and left ventricular diameters after physiological pacing. PACE 1996; 19:143-149.
4. Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PEB, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 1997; 350:1210-1216.
5. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1854-1862.
6. Nielsen JC, Andersen HR, Thomsen PEB, et al. Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing. Circulation 1998; 97:987-995.
7. Schwaab B, Kindermann M, Schatzer-Klotz D, et al. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. PACE 2001; 24:1585-1595.
8. Kodama K, Matsumura Y, Mishima M, et al. Effects of various pacing modes on cardiac function and myocardial energetics. Jpn J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1989; 5:480-487.
9. Yoshida H, Shirotani M, Mochizuki M, et al. Assessment of myocardial fatty acid metabolism in atrioventricular synchronous pacing: Analysis of iodine 123-labeled beta-methyl iodophenyl pentadecanoic acid SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 1999; 6:33-40.
10. Rosenqvist M, Isaaz K, Botvinick EH, et al. Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67:148-156.
11. Nielsen JC, Bottcher M, Nielsen TT, et al. Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing - effect of pacing mode and rate. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35:1453-1461.
12. Ishikawa T, Sumita S, Kimura K, et al. Prediction of optimal atrioventricular delay in patients with implanted DDD pacemakers. PACE 1999; 22:1365-1371.
13. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, et al. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: Results of a survey echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978; 58:1072-1083.
14. Kono M, Yamauchi A, Tsuji T, et al. An immunoradiometric assay for brain natriuretic peptide in human plasma. Jpn Soc Nuc Med Tech 1993; 13:2-7.
15. Barold SS. Permanent single chamber atrial pacing is obsolete. PACE 2001; 24:271-275.
16. Santini M, Ricci R. Is AAI or AAIR still a viable mode of pacing? PACE 2001; 24:276-281.
17. Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, et al. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker. PACE 2001; 24:358-365.
18. Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) trial. JAMA 2002; 288:3115-3123.
19. Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, et al. Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Europace 1999; 1:113-120.
20. Horie H, Tsutamoto T, Ishimoto N, et al. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a biochemical marker for atrioventricular sequence in patients with pacemakers. PACE 1999; 22:282-290.