Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 75, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1145-1149

  Cury, Patricia R ^a,f   Araujo, Ney S ^b   Bowie, Jon ^c   Sallum, Enilson A ^d   Jeffcoat, Marjorie K ^e  

^a SÃO LEOPOLDO MANDIC INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c State University of Campinas ^*

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^f NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bone loss; Clinical trials; Follow up studies; Furcation diagnosis; Radiography, dental; Radiography, subtraction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE GROWTH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LONG TERM CARE; MANDIBLE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MOLAR TOOTH; OSTEOLYSIS; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 4644341805     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.8.1145     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Grondahl K, Kullendorff B, Strid KG, Grondahl HG, Henrikson CO. Detectability of artificial marginal bone lesions as a function of lesion depth. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:156-162.
2. Grondahl K, Grondahl HG, Wennström J, Heijl L. Examiner agreement in estimating changes in periodontal bone from conventional and subtraction radiographs. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:74-79.
3. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS, Magnusson I, et al. Efficacy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using radiographs exposed in a multicenter trial. J Periodontal Res 1996;31:157-160.
4. Janssen PT, van Palenstein Helderman WH, van Aken J. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography. J Clin Periodontol 1989; 16:335-341.
5. Grondahl K, Grondahl HG, Webber RL. Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique. J Clin Periodontol 1984;11:411-420.
6. Kullendorff B, Grondahl K, Rohlin M, Nilsson M. Subtraction radiography of interradicular bone lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 1992;50:259-267.
7. Nicopoulou-Karayianni K, Bragger U, Burgin W, Nielsen PM, Lang NP. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:251-256.
8. Bragger U, Pasquali L, Rylander H, Carnes D, Kornman KS. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography. A methodological study. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:27-37.
9. Nummikoski PV, Steffensen B, Hamilton K, Dove SB. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection. J Periodontol 2000;71:598-605.
10. Cury PR, Sallum EA, Nociti FH Jr, Sallum AW, Jeffcoat MK. Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy in the treatment of Class II furcation defects: A randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 2003;74:3-9.
11. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS, van den Berg HR, Bertens E. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of peri-implant bone change. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:22-27.
12. Byrd V, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Reddy MS, Jeffcoat MK. Semiautomated image registration for digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:473-478.
13. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS, Webber RL, Williams RC, Rüttimann UE. Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 1987;22: 396-402.
14. Hausmann E, Christersson L, Dunford R, Wikesjö U, Phyo J, Genco RJ. Usefulness of subtraction radiography in the evaluation of periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1985;56:4-7.
15. Wenzel A, Warrer K, Karring T. Digital subtraction radiography in assessing bone changes in periodontal defects following guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:208-213.
16. McHenry K, Hausmann E, Wikesjö U, et al. Methodological aspects and quantitative adjuncts to computerized subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 1987;22:125-132.