What can we learn by testing a program?

Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 1998

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 50-52

  Hamlet, Dick ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644341563     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/271771.271788     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. J. Duran and S. Ntafos. An evaluation of random testing. IEEE Trans, on Soft. Eng., 10:438-444, 1984.
2. P. Franki and E. Weyuker. A formal analysis of the fault-detecting ability of testing methods. IEEE Trans, on Sofi. Eng., 19:202-213, 1993.
3. Phyllis G. Franki and Stewart N. Weiss. An experimental comparison of the effectiveness of branch testing and data flow testing. IEEE Trans, on Soft. Eng., 19:774-787, August 1993.
4. M. H. Halstead. Machine-Independent Computer Programming. Spartan Books, Washington, DC, 1962.
5. R. G. Hamlet. A patent problem for abstract programming languages: machine-independent computations. In 4th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 193-197, Denver, CO, 1972.
6. W. E. Howden. Reliability of the path analysis testing strategy. IEEE Trans, on Soft. Eng., 2:208-215, 1976.