Influence of a visual spatial attention task on auditory early and late Nd and P300

Biological Psychology

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 121-134

  Ramirez, Joel ^a   Bomba, Marie ^a   Singhal, Anthony ^a   Fowler, Barry ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dual task; Early Nd; Late Nd; P300; Selective attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CUES; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 4644339757     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alho K. Selective attention in auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology. 29:1992;247-263
2. Donchin, E., Kramer, A., Wickens, C., 1986. Applications of brain event-related potentials to problems in engineering psychology. In: Coles, M., Donchin, E., Porges, S. (Eds.), Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes and Applications. Guilford Press, New York, pp. 702-718.
3. Driver J., Spence C. Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2:1998;254-262
4. Eimer M., Schröger E. ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal attention. Psychophysiology. 35:1998;313-327
5. Giard M., Perrin F., Pernier J., Peronnet F. Several attention related waveforms in auditory areas: A topographic study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 69:1988;371-384
6. Gratton G., Coles M., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 55:1983;468-484
7. Hansen J., Hillyard S. Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 49:1980;277-290
8. Hansen J., Hillyard S. Effects of stimulation rate and attribute cueing on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 21:1984;394-405
9. Hillyard S., Hink R., Schwent V., Picton T. Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science. 182:1973;177-180
10. Karayanidis F., Michie P. Evidence of visual processing negativity with attention to orientation and color in central space. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 103:1997;282-297
11. Keppel, G., 1991. Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook, third ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
12. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology. 38:2001;557-577
13. Näätänen R. Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychological Bulletin. 92:1982a;605-640
14. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related brain potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 13:1990b;201-288
15. Näätänen, R., 1992c. Attention and Brain Function. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
16. Näätänen R., Gaillard A., Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potentials reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica. 42:1978d;313-329
17. Näätänen R., Gaillard A., Varey C. Attention effects on auditory ERPs as a function of interstimulus interval. Biological Psychology. 13:1981e;173-187
18. Posner M. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 32:1980;3-25
19. Posner, M., Nissen, M., Ogden, W., 1978. Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial location. In: Pick, H.L.J., Saltzman, E. (Eds.), Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information. Laurence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 137-157.
20. Rif J., Hari R., Hämäläinen M., Sams M. Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 79:1991;464-472
21. Shelley A., Ward P., Michie P., Andrews S., Mitchell P., Catts S., McConaghy N. The effect of repeated testing on ERP components during auditory selective attention. Psychophysiology. 28:1991;496-510
22. Singhal A., Doerfling P., Fowler B. Effects of a dual-task on the N100-P200 complex and the early and late Nd attention waveforms. Psychophysiology. 39:2002;236-245
23. Teder-Sälejärvi W., Hillyard S. The gradient of spatial auditory attention in free field: an event-related potential study. Perception and Psychophysics. 60:1998;1228-1242
24. Woldorff M., Gallen C., Hampson S., Hillyard S., Pantev C., Sobel D., Bloom F. Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America. 90:1993;8722-8726
25. Woods, D., 1990. The physiological basis of selective attention: implications of event-related potential studies. In: Rohrbaugh, J., Parasuraman, R., Johnson, J. (Eds.), Event-Related Brain Potentials. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 178-209.
26. Woods D., Alain C. Conjoining three auditory features: an event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 13:2001;449-509
27. Woods D., Alho K., Algazi A. Stages of auditory feature conjunction: an event-related potential study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1994;81-94