Nonlinear evolution of quantum states in the adiabatic regime

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 17, 2003, Pages

  Liu, Jie ^a   Wu, Biao ^a,b   Niu, Qian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONDENSATION; DYNAMICS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRON TUNNELING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS;

ADIABATIC REGIME; AHARONOV-ANANDAN PHASES; BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES; HAMILTONIANS DYNAMICS; NONLINEAR EVOLUTION; NONLINEAR SCHRODINGER EQUATION; NONLINEAR TUNNELING MODEL; QUANTUM STATES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 4644322023     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. K. Bergmann, H. Theuer, and B. W. Shore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1003 (1998).
2. M. B. Dahan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4508 (1996)
3. S. R. Wilkinson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4512 (1996).
4. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon Press, New York, 1977)
5. F. Wilczek and A. Shapere, Geometric Phases in Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
6. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 485 (1989).
7. A. J. Leggett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 307 (2001)
8. T. L. Gustavson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 020401 (2002)
9. M. Mackie, R. Kowalski, and J. Javanainen, ibid. 84, 3803 (2000)
10. R. B. Diener et al., ibid. 89, 070401 (2002).
11. Although the norm of a state is conserved, the inner product of two states changes with time.
12. Y.S. Kivshar and B.A. Malomed, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 763 (1989).
13. Y.B. Band, B. Malomed, and M. Trippenbach, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033607 (2002)
14. Y.B. Band and M. Trippenbach, Phys. Rev. A 65, 053602 (2002)
15. G. J. de Valcárcel, cond-mat/0204406.
16. Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1593 (1987).
17. V.I. Arnol'd, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978)
18. A. J. Lichtenberg and M. A. Lieberman, Regular and Stochastic Motion (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983).
19. One can often write ∂ H / ∂ψ&zast; = Hψ, with H being an operator (matrix) depending on the wave function in the nonlinear case. The simple relation, H = ψ|H|ψ, is valid only in the linear case.
20. One thus often regards the mean field equation as the classical analog of the original many-body quantum problem. However, we do not address this correspondence in the present work. R. Franzosi and V. Penna, Phys. Rev. A 63, 043609 (2001).
21. J. C. Garrison and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 165 (1988)
22. J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2555 (1988).
23. V.I. Yukalov, E.P. Yukalova, and V.S. Bagnato, Phys. Rev. A 66, 043601 (2002).
24. -iEtψ(O). With the erasion of the overall phase, the projected state Φ(t) does not change with time is thus a fixed point. This connection may have been known to many; P. Coullett and N. Vandenberghe, J. Phys. B 35, 1593 (2002)
25. R. Franzosi and V. Penna, Phys. Rev. A 65, 013601 (2002).
26. V. A. Yurovsky and A. Ben-Reuven, Phys. Rev. A 63, 043404 (2001)
27. A. Vardi, V. A. Yurovsky, and J. R. Anglin, ibid. 64, 063611 (2001)
28. B. Wu and Q. Niu, ibid. 64, 061603 (2001)
29. J.R. Anglin, cond-mat/0210504.
30. B. Wu and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. A 61, 023402 (2000)
31. J. Liu et al., Phys. Rev. A 66, 023404 (2002).
32. G.J. Milburn et al., Phys. Rev. A 55, 4318 (1997)
33. I. Zapata, F. Sols, and A.J. Leggett, ibid. 57, R28 (1998)
34. A. Smerzi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4950 (1997)
35. A. Vardi and J. R. Anglin, ibid. 86, 568 (2001)
36. S. Kohler and F. Sols, ibid. 89, 060403 (2002).
37. j as closely as possible. In this spirit, Eq. (7) also holds for quasicyclic motions.
38. D. Suter, K.T. Mueller, and A. Pines Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1218 (1988)
39. H. Weinfurter ibid. 64, 1318 (1990).
40. This is different from the semiclassical relation discussed in M. V. Berry, J. Phys. A 17, 1225 (1984).