Patient satisfaction and functional status after aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 874-879

  Meek, R M Dominic ^a,b   Dunlop, David ^a   Garbuz, Donald S ^a   McGraw, Robert ^a   Greidanus, Nelson V ^a   Masri, Bassam A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

articulating; functional outcome; infection; revision; TKA

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RECURRENT INFECTION; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REOPERATION; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 4644317880     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.028     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gustilo T., Comadoll J.L., Gustilo R.B. Long-term results of 56 revision total knee replacements. Orthopaedics. 19:1996;99
2. Insall J.N., Thompson F.M., Brause B.D. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 65:1983;1087
3. Johnson D.P., Bannister G.C. Outcome of infected arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 68:1986;289
4. Scott I.R., Stockley I., Getty C.J.M. Exchange arthroplasty for infected knee replacements A new two-stage method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 75:1993;28
5. Booth R.E. Jr, Lotke P.A. The results of spacer block technique in revision of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 248:1989;57
6. Borden L.S., Gearen P.F. Infected total knee arthroplasty a protocol for management. J Arthroplasty. 2:1987;27
7. Cohen J.C., Hozack W.J., Cuckler J.M., et al. Two-stage reimplantation of septic total knee arthroplasty report of three cases using an antibiotioc-PMMA spacer block. J Arthroplasty. 3:1988;369
8. Goldman R.T., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N. 2 stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 331:1996;118
9. Haddad F.S., Masri B.A., Campbell D., et al. The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surgery Br. 82:2000;807
10. Rosenberg A.G., Haas B., Barden R., et al. Salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 226:1988;29
11. Teeney S.M., Dorr L., Murata G., et al. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty irrigation and debridement versus two-stage reimplantation. J Arthroplasty. 5:1990;25
12. Wilde A.H., Ruth J.T. Two-stage reimplantation in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 236:1988;23
13. Wilde A.H. Management of infected knee and hip prostheses. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 6:1994;172
14. Windsor R.E., Insall J.N., Urs W.K., et al. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 72:1990;272
15. Woods G.W., Lionberger D.R., Tullos H.S. Failed total knee arthroplasty revision and arthrodesis for infectious and noninfectious complications. Clin Orthop. 173:1983;184
16. Barrack R.L., Engh G., Rorabeck C., et al. Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 15:2000;990
17. Lautenschlager E.P., Jacobs J.J., Marshall G.W., et al. Mechanical properties of bone cements containing large doses of antibiotic powders. J Biomed Mater Res. 10:1976;929
18. Lautenschlager E.P., Marshall G.W., Marks K.E., et al. Mechanical strength of acrylic bone cements impregnated with antibiotics. J Biomed Mater Res. 10:1976;837
19. Cadambi A., Jones R.E., Maale G.E. A protocol for staged revision of infected total hip and knee arthroplasties the use of antibiotic cement-implant composites. Int Orthop. 3:1995;133
20. Fehring T.K., Odum S., Calton T.F., et al. Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. Clin Orthop. 380:2000;9
21. Hofmann A.A., Kane K.R., Tkach T.K., et al. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer. Clin Orthop. 321:1995;45
22. McPherson E.J., Lewonowski K., Dorr L.D. Brief communication techniques in arthroplasty use of an articulated PMMA spacer in the infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 10:1995;87
23. Calton T.F., Fehring T.K., Griffin W.L. Bone loss associated with the use of spacer blocks in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 345:1997;148
24. Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in lomgitudinal studies development and validation. J Chron Dis. 40:1987;373
25. Engh G.A. Bone defect classification. Engh G.A., Rorabeck C.H. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. 1997;63-120 Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore. MD
26. Salter R.B. The biologic concept of continuous passive motion of synovial joints The first 18 years of basic research and its clinical application. Clin Orthop. 242:1989;12
27. Sharma L., Sinacore J., Daugherty C., et al. Prognostic factors for functional outcome of total knee replacement a prospective study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 51:1996;152
28. Dunbar M.J., Robertsson O., Ryd L., et al. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 83:2001;339