Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with the Alcon CustomCornea and the VISX CustomVue: Three-month results

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages

  Awwad, Shady T ^a   El Kateb, Mohamed ^a   Bowman, R Wayne ^a   Cavanagh, H Dwight ^a   McCulley, James P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEST SPECTACLE CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA COMA; CORNEA EDEMA; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFRACTION ERROR; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SPHERIC ABERRATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNCORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ACUITY; WAVEFORM; WAVEFRONT GUIDED LASER IN SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; WAVEFRONT MAPPING;

ASTIGMATISM; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MYOPIA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 4644317870     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Kaiserman I, Hazarbassanov R, Varssano D, Grinbaum A. Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK. Ophthalmology 2004;111:454-457.
2. Lawless MA, Hodge C, Rogers CM, Sutton GL. Laser in situ keratomileusis with Alcon CustomCornea. J Refract Surg 2003;19:S691-S696.
3. Cosar CB, Saltuk G, Sener AB. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with the Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix system. J Refract Surg 2004;20:35-39.
4. Durrie DS. First 100 CustomCornea commercial eyes. J Refract Surg 2003;19:S687-S690.
5. Aizawa D, Shimizu K, Komatsu M, Ito M, Suzuki M, Ohno K, Uozato H. Clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: 6-month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1507-1513.
6. Drum BA. Aberration analyses needed for FDA evaluation of safety and effectiveness of wavefront-guided refractive surgical devices. J Refract Surg 2003;19:S588-S591.
7. Nuijts RM, Nabar VA, Hament WJ, Eggink FA. Wavefront-guided versus standard laser in situ keratomileusis to correct low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1907-1913.
8. Phusitphoykai N, Tungsiripat T, Siriboonkoom J, Vongthongsri A. Comparison of conventional versus wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the same patient. J Refract Surg 2003;19:S217-S220.
9. Vongthongsri A, Phusitphoykai N, Naripthapan P. Comparison of wavefront-guided customized ablation vs. conventional ablation in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2002;18:S332-S335.
10. Seward MS, Oral D, Bowman RW, El-Agha MS, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP. Comparison of LADARVision and Visx Star S3 laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes in myopia and hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:2351-2357.
11. Hersh PS, Fry K, Blaker JW. Spherical aberration after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Clinical results and theoretical models of etiology. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:2096-2104.
12. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Mierdel P, Seiler T. Increased higher-order optical aberrations after laser refractive surgery: a problem of subclinical decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:362-369.
13. Bueeler M, Mrochen M, Seiler T. Maximum permissible torsional misalignment in aberration-sensing and wavefront-guided corneal ablation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:17-25.