Study of interdisciplinarity in chemistry research based on the production of Puerto Rican scientists 1992-2001

Information Research

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2004, Pages

  Sanz Casado, Elías ^a   Martín Moreno, Carmen ^a   García Zorita, Carlos ^a   Lascurain Sánchez, María Luisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644302503     PISSN: 13681613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Chubin, D.E., Porter, A.L., & Rossini, F.A. (1984). 'Citation classics' analysis: an approach to characterizing interdisciplinary research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(6), 360-368.
2. Dervin, B. (2003). Human studies and user studies: a call for methodological interdisciplinarity . Information Research, 9(1), paper 166. Retrieved 12 April, 2004 from http://informationr.net/ir/9-1/paper166.html
3. Greenacre, M. (1994). Correspondence analysis and its interpretation. In M. Greenacre, & J. Blasius (Eds.), Correspondence analysis in the Social Sciences. Recent Developments and Applications (pp. 3-22). Londres: Academic Press.
4. Greenacre, M. (1993). Correspondence analysis in practice. London: Academic Press.
5. Hurd, J. M. ( 1992a). The future of university science and technology libraries: implications of increasing interdisciplinarity. Science & Technology Libraries, 13(1), 17-32.
6. Hurd, J. M. ( 1992b). Interdisciplinary research in the sciences: implications for library organization. College & Research Libraries, 53(4), 283-297.
7. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237-1249.
8. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203-222.
9. Porter, A. L., & Chubin, D.E. (1985). An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics, 8 (2-3), 161-176.
10. Qin, J., Lancaster, F. W., & Allen, B. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 893-916.
11. Sanz Casado, E., & Martín Moreno, C. (1998). Aplicación de técnicas bibliométricas a la gestión bibliotecaria. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 12(24), 24-40.
12. Sanz Casado, E., Martín Moreno, C., Maura, M., Rodríguez, B., García Zorita, C., & Lascurain Sánchez, M.L. (2002). Análisis de la interdisciplinariedad de los investigadores puertorriqueños en ciencias químicas, durante el período 1992-1999. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 25(4), 421-432
13. Song, C.H. (2003). Interdisciplinarity and knowledge inflow/outflow structure among science and engineering research in Korea. Scientometrics, 58(1), 129-141.
14. Tijssen, R.J.W. (1992). A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: co-classification analysis of energy research. Research Policy, 21(1), 27-44.
15. Tomov, D.T., & Mutafov, H.G. (1996). Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics, 37(2), 267-278.
16. Van Raan, A.F.J., & Van Leeuwen, T.N. (2002). Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research - application of bibliometric methods in nutrition and food research. Research Policy, 31(4), 611-632.