Effect of different electric impulses on development of in-vitro matured goat oocytes reconstructed with fetal fibroblast cell

Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

Volumn 73, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1219-1223

  Das, S K ^a,b   Majumdar, A C ^a,c  

^a INDIAN VETERINARY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b NATIONAL DAIRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^c Embryo Technology Lab   (India)

Author keywords

Fibroblasts; Goat; Nuclear transfer; Reconstructed embryo

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHALASIN B;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CLONING; CELL CYCLE; CELL ISOLATION; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; ELECTROFUSION (CELL); EMBRYO; ENUCLEATION; FEMALE; FETUS; GOAT; IN VITRO STUDY; METAPHASE; MICROMANIPULATOR; MONOLAYER CULTURE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; OOCYTE MATURATION; OVARY; SKIN FIBROBLAST; SLAUGHTERHOUSE;

ANIMALIA; CAPRA HIRCUS; INSERTION SEQUENCES;

EID: 4644302007     PISSN: 03678318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baguisi A, Behboodi E, Melican D, Pollock J S, Destrepes M M, Cammuso C, Williams J L, Nims S D, Porter C A, Midura P, Palacios M J, Ayres S L, Denniston R S, Hayes M L, Ziomek C A, Meade H M, Godke R A, Gavin W G, Overstorm E Wemel and Echelard Y. 1999. Production of goat by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nature Biotechnology 17: 456-61.
2. Barnes F L, Collas P, Powell R, King W A, Westhusin M and Shepherd D. 1993. Influence of recipient oocyte cell cycle stage on DNA synthesis, nuclear transplant bovine embryos. Molecular Reproduction Development 36: 33-41.
3. Bordignon V and Smith L C. 1998. Telophase enucleation: an improved method to prepare recipient cytoplasts for use in bovine nuclear transfer. Molecular Reproduction Development 49: 29-36.
4. Campbell K H S, Loi P, Otaegui P J and Wilmut I. 1996. Cell cycle coordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Reviews on Reproduction 1: 40-46.
5. Cheong H T, Takahashi Y and Kanagawa H. 1993. Birth of mice after transplantation of early cell-cycle-stage embryonic nuclei into enucleated oocytes. Biological Reproduction 48: 958-63.
6. Cheong H T, Takahashi Y and Kanagawa H. 1994. Relations between nuclear remodeling and subsequent development of mouse embryonic nuclei transferred to enucleated oocytes. Molecular Reproduction Development 37: 138-45.
7. Cibelli J B, Stice S L, Golueke P J, Kane J J, Jerry J and Blackwell C. 1998. Cloned transgenic calves produced from non-quiescent foetal fibroblasts. Science 280: 1256-58.
8. Collas P, Balise J J and Robl J M. 1992a. Influence of cell cycle stage of donor nucleus on development of nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biological Reproduction 46: 492-500.
9. Collas P, Pinto Correia C, Ponce de Leon A and Robl J M. 1992b. Effect of donor cell cycle stage on chromatin and spindle morphology in nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biological Reproduction 46: 501-11.
10. Connell-Crowley L, Elledge S K and Harper J W. 1998. G1 cyclin-dependent kinases are sufficient to initiate DNA synthesis in quiescent human fibroblasts. Current Biological Science 8: 65068.
11. Das S K, Goswami S L, Ramesha K P and Datta T K. 1994. A technique for chromosome analysis of preimplantation embryos. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 47 (5): 396-400.
12. Holley R W and Kiernan J A. 1968. 'Contact inhibition' of cell division in 3T3 cells. Proceedings National Academy Science USA 60: 300-304.
13. Iyer V R, Eisen M B, Ross D T, Schuler G, Moore TM, Lee J C F, Trent J M, Staudt L M, Hudson J, Bogoski M S, Laskari D, Shalon D, Botstein D and Brown P O. 1999. The transcriptional program in the response of human fibroblasts to serum. Science 8: 377-87.
14. Keefer C L, Baldassarre H, Keyston R, Wang B, Bhatia B, Bilodeau A, Zhou J F, Leduc M, Downey B R, Lazaris S and Karatzas C N. 2001. Generation of a dwarf goat (Capra hircus) clones following nuclear transfer with transfected and nontransfected fetal fibroblasts and in vitro matured oocytes. Biological Reproduction 64: 849-56.
15. Koo D B, Kang Y K, Choi Y H, Park J S, Man S K, Park I Y, Kim S U, Lee K K, Son D S, Chang Y K and Han Y M. 2000. In vitro development of reconstructed porcine oocytes after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biological Reproduction 63: 986-92.
16. Kwon O Y and Kono t. 1996. Production of sextuplet mice by transferring metaphase nuclei from four-cell embryos. Journal of Reproduction Fertility 17: 30.
17. Liu J L, Wang M K, Sun Q Y, Xu Z and Chen D Y. 2000. Effect of telophase enucleation on bovine somatic nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 54: 989-98.
18. Mohamed Nour M S and Takahashi Y. 1999. Preparation of young preactivated oocytes with high enuleation efficiency for bovine nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 51: 661-66.
19. Szollosi D, Czolowska R, Szollosi M S and Tarkowski A K. 1988. Remodeling of mouse thymocyte nuclei depends on the time of their into activated homologous oocytes. Journal of Cell Science 91: 603-13.
20. Vignon X, Chesne P, LeBourghis D, Heyman Y and Renard J P. 1998. Developmental potential of bovine embryos reconstructed with somatic nuclei cultured skin and muscle fetal cells. Theriogenology 49: 392.
21. Wakayama T, Perry A C F, Zocotti M, Johnson K R and Yanagimachi R. 1998. Full term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 394: 74.
22. Wells D N, Misica P M, Day T A and Tervit H R. 1997. Production of cloned lambs from an established embryonic cell line: a comparison between in vivo and in vitro matured cytoplasts. Biological Reproduction 57: 385-93.
23. Wells D N, Misica P M, McMillan W H and Tervit H R. 1998. Production of cloned bovine fetuses following nuclear trasfer using cells from fetal fibroblast cell line. Theriogenology 49: 330.
24. Wells D N, Misica P M and Tervit H R. 1999. Production of cloned calves following nuclear transfer with cultured adult mural granulose cells. Biological Reproduction 60: 996-1005.
25. Wilmut I, Schnieke A E, McWhir J, Kind A J and Campbell K H S. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385: 13.