Ambient odour testing of concentrated animal feeding operations using field and laboratory olfactometers

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 109-114

  Newby, B D ^a   McGinley, Mike A ^b  

^a MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES   (United States)

^b St Croix Sensory Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Dilution to threshold; Olfactometry; Regulations; Scentometer

Indexed keywords

FEEDSTOCKS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; RESEARCH LABORATORIES; SAMPLING; SCREENING;

CONFINED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (CAFO); OLFACTOMETERS; SCENTOMETERS;

ODORS;

BUTANOL;

AGRICULTURAL EMISSION; EMISSION CONTROL; ODOR; OLFACTION;

AIR ANALYSIS; AIR POLLUTION; AIR SAMPLING; AMBIENT AIR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; FEEDING; LABORATORY TEST; NONHUMAN; OLFACTOMETER; OLFACTOMETRY; RESEARCH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 4644295859     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2004.0235     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. ASTM Standard Practice E544-99, Referencing Suprathreshold Odor Intensity.
2. ASTM Standard Practice E679-91, Determination of Odor and Taste Thresholds by a Forced Choice Ascending Concentration Series of Limits.
3. European Standard, DRAFT prEN 13725, Air Quality - Determination of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry.
4. Freund, John E. (1988). Modern Elementary Statistics, Seventh Edition. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
5. Missouri Air Pollution Control Program, Laws and Regulations, Missouri Department of Natural Resources.
6. Montgomery, Douglas C. (1991) Design and Analysis of Experiments, Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.