A qualitative assessment of Charlotte REACH: An ecological perspective for decreasing CVD and diabetes among African Americans

Ethnicity and Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 3 SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages

  DeBate, Rita ^a   Plescia, Marcus ^c   Joyner, Dennis ^b   Span, LaPronda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b LEVINE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecology model; Focus groups; Health disparities; REACH 2010

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; ECOLOGY; FAMILY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MARKET; MORBIDITY; MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SKILL; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DEMOGRAPHY; ETHNOLOGY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COMMUNITY HEALTH PLANNING; DIABETES MELLITUS; ECOLOGY; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTHY PEOPLE PROGRAMS; HUMANS; NORTH CAROLINA; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 4644293662     PISSN: 1049510X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Plescia M, Koontz S, Laurent S. Community assessment in a vertically-integrated health-care system. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(5): 811-814.
2. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15:351-377.
3. Sallis JF, Owen N. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2002:462-484.
4. McGraw SA, Sellers D, Stone E, et al. Measuring implementation of school programs and policies to promote healthy eating and physical activity among youth. Prev Med. 2000;31:86-97.
5. Hawe P, Degeling D, Hall J. Evaluating Health Promotion. London: Maclennan & Petty; 1995:174-184.
6. Rutherford LR. Conducting focus groups. In: Bensley RJ, Brookins-Fisher J, eds. Community Health Education Methods. Boston, Mass: Jones and Bartlett; 2001:39-55.
7. Carey MA. The group effect in focus groups: planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. In: Mores JM, ed. Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage; 1994:225-241.
8. Spradley JP. The Ethnographic Interview. Fort Worth, Tex: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1979.
9. Qualitative Solutions and Research (QSR) International. NVivo 2.0. Dorcester, Melbourne, Australia: QSR; 2002.
10. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. The scope of health behavior and health education. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2002:3-21.