Land cover mapping with patch-derived landscape indices

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 437-449

  Chust, Guillem ^a,b,c   Ducrot, Danielle ^b   Pretus, Joan Ll ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b CESBIO   (France)

^c École Nationale de Formation Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

Classification; Image segmentation; Patch indices

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; DATA REDUCTION; LIGHT REFLECTION; RELIABILITY; REMOTE SENSING; TEXTURES;

LANDSCAPE; SPECIES;

LAND USE;

INDEX METHOD; LAND COVER; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; MAPPING; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

ARIEGE; ARIZE MASSIF; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; MIDI-PYRENEES; PYRENEES; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 4644270596     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Chust, G., 2002. Satellite-derived landscape descriptors and its use in biodiversity mapping. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse.
2. Chust G., Ducrot D., Riera J.Ll., Pretus J.Ll. Characterising human-modelled landscapes at a stationary state: a case study of Minorca (Spain). Environ. Conservation. 26:1999;322-331
3. Civco D.L. Topographic normalization of Landsat Thematic Mapper digital imagery. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing. 55:1989;1303-1309
4. Colby J. Topographic normalization in rugged terrain. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing. 57:1991;531-537
5. Congalton R.G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Environ. 37:1991;35-46
6. Ducrot, D., Sassier, H., Mombo, J., Goze, S., Planes, J.G., 1998. Contextual methods for multi-source land cover classification with application to RADARSAT and SPOT data. In: Proceedings of European Symposium on Remote Sensing, Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing, vol. SPIE 3500, Barcelona, 21-25 September 1998.
7. Eiumnoh A., Shrestha R. Application of DEM data to Landsat image classification: evaluation in a tropical wet-dry landscape of Thailand. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing. 66:2000;297-304
8. Fjørtoft, R., 1999. Segmentation d'images radar par détection de contours. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse.
9. Gong P., Marceau D.J., Howarth P.J. A comparison of spatial feature extraction algorithms for land-use classification with SPOT HRV data. Remote Sensing Environ. 40:1992;137-151
10. Haralick R.M., Shanmugan K.S., Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybern. 3:1973;610-621
11. Hodgson M.E., Galie G.L. A cartographic modeling approach for surface orientation-related applications. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing. 65:1999;85-95
12. Hsu S. Texture-tone analysis for automated landuse mapping. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing. 44:1978;1393-1404
13. Karathanassi V., Iossifidis C., Rokos D. A texture-based classification method for classifying built areas according to their density. Int. J. Remote Sensing. 21:2000;1807-1823
14. King R.B. Land cover mapping principles: a return to interpretation fundamentals. Int. J. Remote Sensing. 23:2002;3525-3545
15. Krummel J.R., Gardner R.H., Sugihara G., O'Neill R.V., Coleman P.R. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos. 48:1987;321-324
16. Le Hégarat-Mascle S., Bloch I., Vidal-Madjar D. Application of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory to unsupervised classification in multisource remote sensing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing. 35:1997;1018-1031
17. Lemaréchal C., Fjørtoft R., Marthon P., Cubero-Castan E. Comments on Geodesic saliency of watershed contours and hierarchical segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 20:1998;762-763
18. Lobo A. Image segmentation and discriminant analysis for the identification of land cover units in ecology. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing. 35:1997;1136-1145
19. McGarigal, K., Marks, B.J., 1994. Fragstats: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Program documentation. Oregon State University, Corvallis.
20. Olff H., Ritchie M.E. Fragmented nature: consequences for biodiversity. Landscape Urban Plan. 58:2002;83-92
21. Pons X., Solé-Sugrañes Ll. A simple radiometric correction model to improve automatic mapping of vegetation from multispectral satellite data. Remote Sensing Environ. 48:1994;191-204
22. Rabben, E.L., 1960. Fundamentals of photo interpretation. In: Colwell, R.N. (Ed.), Manual of Photographic Interpretation. ASPRS, Washington, pp. 99-168.
23. Rosenfield G.H., Fitzpatrick-Lins K. A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing. 52:1986;223-227
24. Shafer, G., 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
25. Shen J., Castan S. An optimal linear operator for step edge detection, CVGIP. Graph. Models Image Process. 54:1992;112-133
26. Stehman S.V. Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sensing Environ. 62:1997;77-89
27. Stehman S.V. Practical implications of design-based sampling inference for thematic map accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing Environ. 72:2000;35-45
28. Treitz P., Howarth P. Integrating spectral, spatial, and terrain variables for forest ecosystem classification. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing. 66:2000;305-317
29. Turner M.G. Spatial simulation of landscapes changes in Georgia: a comparison of 3 transition models. Landscape Ecol. 1:1987;29-36
30. Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Ecological Studies 82, New York.
31. Vincent L., Soille P. Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 13:1991;583-598
32. Wang L., He D.C. A new statistical approach for texture analysis. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing. 56:1990;61-66
33. Weska J.C., Dyer R., Rosenfeld A. A comparative study of texture measures for terrain classification. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybern. 6:1976;269-285