Spatial differences in multi-resolution urban automata modeling

Transactions in GIS

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 479-492

  Dietzel, Charles ^a   Clarke, Keith C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; FORECASTING;

AUTOMATON MODEL; CELLULAR AUTOMATONS; COMPUTATIONAL POWER; MODEL OUTPUTS; MODELLING TECHNIQUES; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIAL DIFFERENCES; SPATIAL MODELLING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; URBAN AREAS;

URBAN GROWTH;

CALIBRATION; GIS; MODELING; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; URBAN GROWTH;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4644262267     PISSN: 13611682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2004.00197.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Agarwal C, Green G L, Grove M, Evans T, and Schweik C 2000 A Review and Assessment of Land-use Change Models: Dynamics of Space, Time, and Human Choice. Bloomington, IN, U.S. Forest Service and the Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change (CIPEC)
2. Batty M 1977 Urban Modelling. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
3. Batty M and Xie Y 1994 Modeling inside GIS: Part 2, Selecting and calibrating urban models using Arc/Info. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 8: 470-541
4. Batty M, Xie Y, and Sun Z 1999 Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 23: 205-33
5. Brad R K and Klosterman R E 2001 Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools. Redlands, CA, ESRI Press
6. CA-FMMP 2003 California Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. WWW document, http://ceres.ca.gov/calsip/cv.
7. Candau J 2000 Calibrating a cellular automaton model of urban growth in a timely manner. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling (GIS/EM4), Banff, Alberta
8. Clarke K C and Gaydos L 1998 Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: Long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 12: 699-714
9. Clarke K C, Hoppen S, and Gaydos L 1997 A self-modifying cellular automata model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B 24: 247-61
10. Clarke K C, Parks B O, and Crane M P (eds) 2002 Geographic Information Systems and Environmental Modeling. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall
11. Costanza R and Maxwell T 1994 Resolution and predictability: An approach to the scaling problem. Landscape Ecology 9: 47-57
12. Couclelis H 1985 Cellular worlds: A framework for modeling micro-macro dynamics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 17: 585-96
13. de Almeida C M, Batty M, Monteiro A M V, Camara G, Soares-Filho B S, Cerqueira G C, and Pennachin C L 2003 Stochastic cellular automata modeling of urban land use dynamics: Empirical development and estimation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 27: 481-509
14. Dungan J L, Perry J N, Dale M R T, Legendre P, Citron-Pousty S, Fortin M J, Jakomulska A, Miriti M, and Rosenberg M S 2002 A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25: 626-40
15. Esnard A M and Yang Y 2002 Descriptive and comparative studies of 1990 urban extent data for the New York Metropolitan Region. URISA Journal 14: 57-62
16. Geertman S and Stillwell J 2002 Planning Support Systems in Practice. Heildelburg, Springer Verlag
17. Goldstein N C 2004 A genetic algorithm for calibration of urban automata. In Atkinson P, Foody G, Darby S, and Wu F (eds) GeoDynamics. Beton Rome, FL, CRC Press: in press
18. Jantz C A, Goetz S J, and Shelley M K 2004 Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore/Washington metropolitan area. Environment and Planning B 31: 251-71
19. Klostermann R E 1999 The What If? collaborative planning support system. Environment and Planning B 26: 393-408
20. Landis J and Zhang M 1998 The second generation of the California urban futures model: Part 2, Specification and calibration results of the land use change submodel. Environment and Planning B 25: 795-842
21. Lee D B 1973 Requiem for large-scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 39: 163-78
22. Lee D B 1994 Retrospective on large-scale urban models. Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 35-40
23. Li X and Yeh A G O 2001 Zoning land for agricultural protection by the integration of remote sensing, GIS, and cellular automata. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67: 471-7
24. Pettit C, Shyy T-K, and Stimson R 2002 An on-line planning support system to evaluate urban and regional planning scenarios. In Geertman S and Stillwell J (eds) Planning Support Systems in Practice. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag: 331-47
25. Silva E A and Clarke K C 2002 Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 26: 525-52
26. Straatman B, White R, and Engelen G 2004 Towards an automatic calibration procedure for constrained cellular automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28: 149-70
27. Tobler W R 1979 Cellular geography. In Gale S and Olsson G (eds) Philosophy in Geography. Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Group
28. Torrens P and O'Sullivan D 2001 Cellular automata and urban simulation: Where do we go from here? Environment and Planning B 28: 163-8
29. U.S. EPA 2000 Projecting Land-use Change: A Summary of Models for Assessing the Effects of Community Growth and Change on Land-use Patterns. Cincinnati, OH, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development Report No EPA/600/R-00/098 (available at http://www.epa.gov/ecommunity/tools/reportfinal3.pdf)
30. U.S. Geological Survey 2003. Preliminary Assessment of Urban Growth in California's Central Valley. WWW document, http://ceres.ca.gov/calsip/cv.
31. Verburg P H, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A, Limpiada R, Espaldon V, and Mastura S S A 2002 Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: The CLUE-S model. Environmental Management 30: 391-405
32. Ward D P, Murray A T, and Phinn S R 2000 A stochastically constrained cellular model of urban growth. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 24: 539-58
33. Wegener M 1994 Operational urban models: State of the art. Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 17-30
34. White R and Engelen G 1993 Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A 25: 1175-99
35. Wu F 2002 Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: The application to rural-urban land conversions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16: 795-818
36. Yang X and Lo C P 2003 Modelling urban growth and landscape change in the Atlanta metropolitan area. International Journal of Geographical