Clinical research 2: Legal and ethical issues in research

Intensive and Critical Care Nursing

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 313-315

  Endacott, R ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ANONYMOUS TESTING; ARTICLE; BENEFICENCE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; INFORMED CONSENT; JUSTICE; LAW; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PRIVACY; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; NATIONAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (AUSTRALIA);

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; PATIENT SELECTION; PRINCIPLE-BASED ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 4644259779     PISSN: 09643397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2004.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Annane D. Outin H. Fisch C. Bellissant E. The effect of waiving consent on enrolment in a sepsis trial Intensive Care Medicine 302 2004 321-324
2. Lemaire F. A waiver of consent for intensive care research? Intensive Care Medicine 302 2004 177-179
3. Miles MB Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. California: Sage Publications; 1994
4. NHMRC Guidelines under section 95 of the Privacy Act 1988. Canberra: NHMRC; 2000
5. NHMRC. Human research ethics handbook: commentary on the national statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. Canberra: NHMRC; 2001
6. The Alfred Hospital Research and Ethics Unit. The difference between audit/quality assurance (QA) and research. 2000, accessed on 19.03.04 via http://www.alfredresearch.org/ethics/qa.htm