Inquiring scientists want to know

Educational Leadership

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 63-66

  Colburn, Alan ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644255324     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Colburn, A. (1997, Fall). How to make lab activities more open ended. CSTA Journal, 4-6. Available: www.exploratorium.edu/IFI/resources/workshops/ lab_activities.html
3. Colburn, A., & Clough, M. P. (1997, May). Implementing the learning cycle. The Science Teacher, 30-33.
4. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. School Review, 79(2), 171-212.
6. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Schwab, J. J. (1964). Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 6-30). Chicago: Rand McNally.
8. Shymansky, J., Hedges, L., & Woodworth, G. (1990). A reassessment of the effects of inquiry-based science curricula of the 60's on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 127-144.
9. Shymansky J., Kyle, W., & Alport, J. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 387-404.