-
1
-
-
0029987569
-
Trials to assess equivalence: The importance of rigorous methods
-
B. Jones, P. Jarvis, J.A. Lewis, and A.F. Ebbutt Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods BMJ 313 1996 36 39
-
(1996)
BMJ
, vol.313
, pp. 36-39
-
-
Jones, B.1
Jarvis, P.2
Lewis, J.A.3
Ebbutt, A.F.4
-
2
-
-
84971580244
-
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
-
D.G. Altman, and J.M. Bland Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence BMJ 311 1995 485
-
(1995)
BMJ
, vol.311
, pp. 485
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
Bland, J.M.2
-
3
-
-
0018076475
-
The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. Survey of 71 "negative" trials
-
J.A. Freiman, T.C. Chalmers, H. Smith Jr., and R.R. Kuebler The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. Survey of 71 "negative" trials N. Engl. J. Med. 299 1978 690 694
-
(1978)
N. Engl. J. Med.
, vol.299
, pp. 690-694
-
-
Freiman, J.A.1
Chalmers, T.C.2
Smith Jr., H.3
Kuebler, R.R.4
-
4
-
-
0034939731
-
Negative results of randomized clinical trials published in the surgical literature: Equivalency or error?
-
J.B. Dimick, M. Diener-West, and P.A. Lipsett Negative results of randomized clinical trials published in the surgical literature: equivalency or error? Arch. Surg. 136 2001 796 800
-
(2001)
Arch. Surg.
, vol.136
, pp. 796-800
-
-
Dimick, J.B.1
Diener-West, M.2
Lipsett, P.A.3
-
5
-
-
0034595229
-
Claims of equivalence in medical research: Are they supported by the evidence?
-
W.L. Greene, J. Concato, and A.R. Feinstein Claims of equivalence in medical research: are they supported by the evidence? Ann. Intern. Med. 132 2000 715 722
-
(2000)
Ann. Intern. Med.
, vol.132
, pp. 715-722
-
-
Greene, W.L.1
Concato, J.2
Feinstein, A.R.3
-
6
-
-
0017643592
-
Significance testing to establish equivalence between treatments, with special reference to data in the form of 2 x 2 tables
-
C.W. Dunnett, and M. Gent Significance testing to establish equivalence between treatments, with special reference to data in the form of 2 x 2 tables Biometrics 33 1977 593 602
-
(1977)
Biometrics
, vol.33
, pp. 593-602
-
-
Dunnett, C.W.1
Gent, M.2
-
7
-
-
0036678663
-
Claims of equivalence in randomized controlled trials of the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children
-
D.J. Krysan, and A.R. Kemper Claims of equivalence in randomized controlled trials of the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children Pediatr. Infect Dis. J. 21 2002 753 758
-
(2002)
Pediatr. Infect Dis. J.
, vol.21
, pp. 753-758
-
-
Krysan, D.J.1
Kemper, A.R.2
-
8
-
-
0032063087
-
Equivalence and superiority testing in regeneration clinical trials
-
J.C. Gunsolley, R.K. Elswick, and J.M. Davenport Equivalence and superiority testing in regeneration clinical trials J. Periodontol. 69 1998 521 527
-
(1998)
J. Periodontol.
, vol.69
, pp. 521-527
-
-
Gunsolley, J.C.1
Elswick, R.K.2
Davenport, J.M.3
-
9
-
-
0016817841
-
Clinical biostatistics: XXXIV. the other side of 'statistical significance': Alpha, beta, delta, and the calculation of sample size
-
A.R. Feinstein Clinical biostatistics: XXXIV. The other side of 'statistical significance': alpha, beta, delta, and the calculation of sample size Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 18 1975 491 505
-
(1975)
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.
, vol.18
, pp. 491-505
-
-
Feinstein, A.R.1
-
10
-
-
0022710709
-
A proposal for interpreting and reporting negative studies
-
W.W. Hauck, and S. Anderson A proposal for interpreting and reporting negative studies Stat. Med. 5 1986 203 209
-
(1986)
Stat. Med.
, vol.5
, pp. 203-209
-
-
Hauck, W.W.1
Anderson, S.2
-
11
-
-
0034038181
-
Design and interpretation of equivalence trials
-
T.R. Fleming Design and interpretation of equivalence trials Am. Heart J. 139 2000 S171 S176
-
(2000)
Am. Heart J.
, vol.139
-
-
Fleming, T.R.1
-
12
-
-
0037674049
-
Overall survival is not a realistic end point for clinical trials of new drugs in advanced solid tumors: A critical assessment based on recently reported phase III trials in colorectal and breast cancer
-
A. Di Leo, H. Bleiberg, and M. Buyse Overall survival is not a realistic end point for clinical trials of new drugs in advanced solid tumors: a critical assessment based on recently reported phase III trials in colorectal and breast cancer J. Clin. Oncol. 21 2003 2045 2047
-
(2003)
J. Clin. Oncol.
, vol.21
, pp. 2045-2047
-
-
Di Leo, A.1
Bleiberg, H.2
Buyse, M.3
|