Randomized comparison of custom laser in situ keratomileusis with the Alcon CustomCornea and the Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix systems: One-month results

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages

  Durrie, Daniel S ^a,b   Stahl, Jason ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEST SPECTACLE CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EXCIMER LASER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMETRY; KERATOMILEUSIS; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOPOGRAPHY; UNCORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ACUITY; WAVEFORM; WAVEFRONT; WAVEFRONT GUIDED LASER VISION;

ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 4644249743     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (2)

1. Checklist of Information Usually Submitted in an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Application for Refractive Surgery Lasers. FDA Guidance Document, October 10, 1996.
2. Waring GO. Standard graphs for reporting refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2000;16:459-466.