Cervical cytology screening history of women diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: A case-control study

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 595-600

  Mitchell, Heather ^a,b,d   Hocking, Jane ^a   Saville, Marion ^a,c  

^a BURNET INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b Victorian Cervical Cytology Registry   (Australia)

^c VICTORIAN CYTOLOGY SERVICE   (Australia)

^d Victorian Cervical Cytology Registry Melbourne   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma; Cervical cancer; Cervical smears; Mass screening; Papanicolaou smear

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SCREENING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 4644239345     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000326428     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. IARC Working Group on Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes: Screening for squamous cervical cancer: Duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. BMJ 1986;293:659-664
2. Parazzini F, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Bocciolone L: Screening practices and invasive cervical cancer risk in different age strata. Gynecol Oncol 1990;38:76-80
3. Sasieni PD, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E, The National Coordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group: Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories on women with and without cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1001-1005
4. Brinton LA, Tashima KT, Lehamn HF, Levine RS, Mallin K, Savitz DA, Stolley PD, Fraumeni JF: Epidemiology of cervical cancer by cell type. Cancer Res 1987;47:1706-1711
5. Herrero R, Brinton LA, Reeves WC, Brenes MM, de Britton RC, Gaitan E, Tenorio F: Screening for cervical cancer in Latin America: A case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 1992;21:1050-1056
6. Makino H, Sato S, Yajima A, Komatsu S, Fukao A: Evaluation of the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: A case-control study in Miyagi, Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med 1995;175:171-178
7. Mitchell H, Medley G, Giles G: Cervical cytology reported as negative and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: No strong evidence of benefit. Br J Cancer 1995;71:894-897
8. Mitchell H, Hocking J, Saville M: Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening. Cancer 2003;99:336-341
9. Plaxe SC, Saltzstein SL: Estimation of the duration of the pre-clinical phase of cervical adenocarcinoma suggests that there is ample opportunity for screening. Gynecol Oncol 1999;75: 55-61
10. Kurman R, Solomon D: The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic Diagnoses. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1994, p 6
11. Guijon FB, Paraskevas M, Brunham R: The association of sexually transmitted diseases with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:185-190
12. Hernandez-Avila M, Lazcano-Ponce EC, de Ruiz PA, Romieu I: Evaluation of the cervical cancer screening programme in Mexico: A population-based case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 1998;27:370-376
13. La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, Decarli A, Fasoli M, Gentile A, Tognoni G: "Pap" smear and the risk of cervical neoplasia: Quantitative estimates from a case-control study. Lancet 1984;2:779-782
14. Walter SD, Clarke EA, Hatcher J, Stitt LW: A comparison of physician and patient reports of Pap smear histories. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:401-410
15. Gram IT, Macaluso M, Stalsberg H: Incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III, and cancer of the cervix uteri following a negative Pap-smear in an opportunistic screening. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998:77:228-232
16. Viikki M, Pukkala E, Hakama M: Risk of cervical cancer after a negative Pap smear. J Med Screen 1999;6:103-107
17. Schoolland M, Segal A, Allpress S, Miranda A, Frost FA, Sterrett GF: Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: Sensitivity of detection by cervical smear. Cancer 2002;96:330-337
18. Lee KR, Minter LJ, Granter SR: Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: A study of 34 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;107:30-35