Comparative study of enamel matrix derivative with or without gtr in the treatment of class ii furcation lesions in dogs

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 476-487

  Regazzini, Plínio ^a   Novaes, Arthur B ^a   De Oliveira, Paulo T ^a   Palioto, Daniela B ^a   Taba, Mário ^a   De Souza, Sergio L S ^a   Grisi, Márcio F M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; ENAMEL; HEALING; HISTOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEMBRANE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PERIODONTICS;

ANIMALS; BICUSPID; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CHELATING AGENTS; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DENTAL CEMENTUM; DENTAL ENAMEL PROTEINS; DOGS; EDETIC ACID; EPITHELIAL ATTACHMENT; FURCATION DEFECTS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; OSTEOGENESIS; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; SURGICAL FLAPS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 4644234253     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: 19453388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/prd.00.0600     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Axelsson P, Lindhe J. The significance of maintenance care in the treatment of periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1981; 8: 281-294.
2. Bergenholtz G. Radectomy of multirooted teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1972; 85: 870-875.
3. Caton J, Nyman S, Zander H. Histometric evaluation of periodontal surgery. II. Connective tissue attachment levels after four regenerative procedures. J Clin Periodontol 1980; 7: 224-231.
4. Moskow B. The response of the gingival sulcus to instrumentation: A histological investigation. J Periodontol 1964; 35: 112-126.
5. Kon S, Novaes AB, Ruben MP, Goldman HM. Visualization of microvascularization of the healing periodontal wound. II. Curettage. J Periodontol 1969; 40: 96-105.
6. Proye M, Polson AM. Effect of root surface alterations on periodontal healing. I. Surgical denudation. J Clin Periodontol 1982; 9: 428-440.
7. Melcher AH. On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. J Periodontol 1976; 47: 256-260.
8. Gottlow J, Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Wennström J. New attachment formation in the human periodontium by guided tissue regeneration. Case reports. J Clin Periodontol 1986; 13: 604-616.
9. Pontoriero R, Lindhe J, Nyman S, Karring T, Rosenberg E, Sanavi F. Guided tissue regeneration in degree II furcationinvolved mandibular molars. A clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1988; 15: 247-254.
10. Becker W, Becker BE, Berg L, Prichard J, Caffesse R, Rosenberg E. New attachment after treatment with root isolation procedures: Report for treated Class III and Class II furcations and vertical osseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1988; 8(3): 8-23.
11. Lekovic V, Kenney E, Kovacevic K, Carranza F. Evaluation of guided tissue regeneration in Class II furcation defects. A clinical re-entry study. J Periodontol 1989; 60: 694-698.
12. Caffesse R, Smith B, Duff B, Morrison E, Merril D, Becker W. Class II furcations treated by guided tissue regeneration in humans: Case reports. J Periodontol 1990; 61: 510-514.
13. Blumenthal NM. A clinical comparison of collagen membranes with e-PTFE membranes in the treatment of human mandibular Class II furcation defects. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 925-933.
14. van Swol R, Ellinger R, Pfeifer J, Barton N, Blumenthal NM. Collagen membrane barrier therapy to guide regeneration in Class II furcations in humans. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 622-629.
15. Black S, Gher M, Sandifer J, Fucini S, Richardson C. Comparative study of collagen and polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in the treatment of human Class II furcation defects. J Periodontol 1994; 65: 598-604.
16. Wang H, O’Neal R, Thomas C, Shyr Y, MacNeil R. Evaluation of an absorbable collagen membrane in treating Class II furcation defects. J Periodontol 1994; 65: 1029-1036.
17. dos Anjos B, Novaes AB Jr, Meffert R, Barbosa EP. Clinical comparison of cellulose and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in the treatment of Class II furcation in mandibular molars with 6- month re-entry. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 454-459.
18. Simonpietri-C JJ, Novaes AB Jr, Batista EL Jr, Filho EJ. Guided tissue regeneration associated with bovine-derived anorganic bone in mandibular Class II furcation defects. 6-month results at re-entry. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 904-911.
19. Laurell L, Falk H, Fornell J, Johard G, Gottlow J. Clinical use of a bioresorbable matrix barrier in guided tissue regeneration therapy. Case series. J Periodontol 1994; 65: 967-975.
20. Hugoson A, Ravald N, Fornell J, Johard G, Teiwik A, Gottlow J.Treatment of Class II furcation involvements in humans with bioresorbable and nonresorbable guided tissue regeneration barriers. A randomized multicenter study. J Periodontol 1995; 66: 624-634.
21. Polson A, Garrett S, Stoller NH, Greenstein G, Harrold C, Laster L. Guided tissue regeneration in human furcation defects after using a biodegradable barrier:A multi-center feasibility study. J Periodontol 1995; 66: 377-385.
22. Hammarström L, Heijl L, Gestrelius S. Periodontal regeneration in buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 669-677.
23. Heijl L. Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in one human experimental defect. A case report. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 693-696.
24. Parashis A, Tsiklakis K. Clinical and radiographic findings following application of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of intrabony defects. A series of case reports. J Clin Periodontol 2000; 27: 705-713.
25. Sculean A, Reich E, Chiantella GC, Brecx M. Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with an enamel matrix protein derivative (Emdogain): A report of 32 cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999; 19: 157-163.
26. Zetterström O, Andersson C, Eriksson L, et al. Clinical safety of enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) in the treatment of periodontal defects. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 697-704.
27. Mellonig J. Enamel matrix derivative for periodontal reconstructive surgery:Technique and clinical and histologic case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999; 19: 9-19.
28. Rasperini G, Ricci G, Silvestri M. Surgical technique for treatment of infrabony defects with enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain): 3 case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999; 19: 579-587.
29. Pontoriero R, Wennström J. Lindhe J. The use of barrier membranes and enamel matrix proteins in the treatment of angular bone defects. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26: 833-840.
30. Heden G. A case report study of 72 consecutive Emdogain-treated intrabony periodontal defects: Clinical and radiographic findings after 1 year. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20: 127-139.
31. Haney JM, Nilvéus RE, McMillan PJ, Wikesjö UME. Periodontal repair in dogs:e-PTFE barrier membranes support wound stabilization and enhance bone regeneration. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 883-890.
32. Novaes AB Jr, Vidigal GM Jr, Novaes AB, Grisi MFM, Polloni S, Rosa A. Immediate implants placed into infected sites: A histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 422-427.
33. Sculean A, Donos N, Brecx M, Reich E, Karring T. Treatment of intrabony defects with guided tissue regeneration and enamel matrix proteins. An experimental study in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol 2000; 27: 466-472.
34. Caffesse RG, Mota LF, Quiñones CR, Morrison EC. Clinical comparison of resorbable and non-resorbable barriers for guided periodontal tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 747-752.
35. Kawase T, Okuda K, Yoshie H, Burns DM. Cytostatic action of enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) on human oral squamous cell carcinoma-derived SCC25 epithelial cells. J Periodontal Res 2000; 3: 291-300.
36. Wikesjö UME, Nilvéus RE, Selvig KA. Significance of early healing events on periodontal repair. A review. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 158-165.
37. Novaes AB Jr, Tamani JP, Oliveira PT, Palioto DB, Almeida ALG. Root trunk concavities as a risk factor for regenerative procedures of Class II furcation lesions in dogs. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 612-619.
38. Novaes AB Jr, Novaes AB, Grisi MFM, Soares UN, Gabarra F. Gengiflex, an alkali- cellulose membrane for GTR: Histologic observations. Braz Dent J 1993; 4: 65-71.
39. Donos N, Sculean A, Glavind L, Reich E, Karring T. Treatment of mandibular degree III furcation involvements with a bioresorbable membrane and Emdogain in monkeys [abstract 2339]. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 924.
40. Araújo MG, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. On the dynamics of periodontal tissue formation in degree III furcation defects. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 738-746.
41. Heijl L, Heden G, Svardström G, Östgren A. Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 705-714.
42. Hammarström L. Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 658-668.
43. Araújo M, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. GTR treatment of degree III furcation defects with 2 different resorbable barriers. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25: 253-259.