A comparison of novices and experts in the identification of sonar signals

Speech Communication

Volumn 43, Issue 4 SPEC. ISS., 2004, Pages 297-310

  Collier, Geoffrey L ^a,b  

^a SOUTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; ALGORITHMS; ECOLOGY; NEURAL NETWORKS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ANIMAL NOISE; SONAR OPERATORS; SONAR SIGNALS;

SONAR;

EID: 4644225084     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2004.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Annett, J., 1971. Sonar recognition training: An investigation of whole vs. part and analytic vs. synthetic procedures. Navtradevcen Technical Report, 67-C-0105-1.
2. Ballas, J., 1993. Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 19 (2), 250-267.
3. Barshan, B., Ayrulu, B., 2002. Fractional Fourier transform pre-processing for networks and its application to object recognition. Neural Networks 15 (1), 131-140.
4. Bishop, C., 1995. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H, Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J., 1984. Classification and Regression trees. Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Monterey.
6. Bruske, J., Sommer, J., 1995. Dynamic cell structure learns perfectly topology preserving map. Neural Comput. 7 (4), 845-865.
7. Chabot, D., 1988. A quantitative technique to compare and classify humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) sounds. Ethology 77 (2), 89-102.
8. Clark, C.W., 1982. The acoustic repertoire of the southern right whale: a quantitative analysis. Anim. Behav. 30 (4), 1060-1071.
9. Dror, I.E., Zagaeski, M., Moss, C.F., 1995. Three-dimensional target recognition via sonar: a neural network model. Neural Networks 8 (1), 149-160.
10. Gaver, W., 1993. What in the world do we hear?: an ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecol. Psychol. 5 (1), 1-29.
11. Gibson, J.J., 1966. The senses considered as perceptual systems, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
12. Gibson, J.J., 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston (Republished by Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986).
13. Handel, S., 1989. Listening: An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events. Bradford, MIT press, Cambridge.
14. Howard, J.H., 1977. Psychophysical structure of eight complex underwater sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62 (1), 1490-1560.
15. Mackay, R.S., Liaw, H.M., 1981. Dolphin vocalization mechanisms. Science 212 (4495), 676-678.
16. McAdams, S., Bigand, E., 1993. Thinkin Sound: The Cognitive Psychology of Human Audition. The Clarendon Press, Oxford.
17. Mellinger, D.K., Clark, C.W., 1997. Methods for automatic detection of mysticete sounds. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 29 (1-4), 163-181.
18. Michaels, C.F., Carello, C., 1981. Direct perception. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
19. Ripley, B.D., 1996. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Shepherd, A.J., 1997. Second-order Methods for Neural Networks. Springer, New York.
21. Solomon, L.N., 1958. Semantic approach to the perception of complex sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30 (5), 421-425.
22. Vanderveer, N.J., 1979. Ecological acoustics: Human perception of environmental sounds. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 4543B (University Microfilms no. 80-04,002).
23. Warren Jr., W.H., Verbrugge, R.R., 1984. Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 10 (5), 704-712.