Structural biochemistry of ATP-driven dimerization and DNA-stimulated activation of SMC ATPases

Current Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 19, 2004, Pages 1778-1782

  Lammens, Alfred ^a   Schele, Alexandra ^a   Hopfner, Karl Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ARGININE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA; HELICASE; SMC PROTEIN, BACTERIA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; GEL CHROMATOGRAPHY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PYROCOCCUS FURIOSUS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARGININE; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GEL; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DNA; DNA HELICASES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PYROCOCCUS FURIOSUS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 4644220369     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.044     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Haering C.H., Nasmyth K. Building and breaking bridges between sister chromatids. Bioessays. 25:2003;1178-1191
2. Gruber S., Haering C.H., Nasmyth K. Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell. 112:2003;765-777
3. Swedlow J.R., Hirano T. The making of the mitotic chromosome. Modern insights into classical questions Mol. Cell. 11:2003;557-569
4. Morrison C., Vagnarelli P., Sonoda E., Takeda S., Earnshaw W.C. Sister chromatid cohesion and genome stability in vertebrate cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31:2003;263-265
5. Jessberger R. The many functions of SMC proteins in chromosome dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:2002;767-778
6. Melby T.E., Ciampaglio C.N., Briscoe G., Erickson H.P. The symmetrical structure of structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) and MukB proteins. Long, antiparallel coiled coils, folded at a flexible hinge J. Cell Biol. 142:1998;1595-1604
7. Case R.B., Chang Y.P., Smith S.B., Gore J., Cozzarelli N.R., Bustamante C. The bacterial condensin MukBEF compacts DNA into a repetitive, stable structure. Science. 305:2004;222-227
8. Bazett-Jones D.P., Kimura K., Hirano T. Efficient supercoiling of DNA by a single condensin complex as revealed by electron spectroscopic imaging. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;1183-1190
9. Arumugam P., Gruber S., Tanaka K., Haering C.H., Mechtler K., Nasmyth K. ATP hydrolysis is required for cohesin's association with chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 13:2003;1941-1953
10. Kimura K., Rybenkov V.V., Crisona N.J., Hirano T., Cozzarelli N.R. 13S condensin actively reconfigures DNA by introducing global positive writhe. Implications for chromosome condensation Cell. 98:1999;239-248
11. Weitzer S., Lehane C., Uhlmann F. A model for ATP hydrolysis-dependent binding of cohesin to DNA. Curr. Biol. 13:2003;1930-1940
12. Hirano M., Hirano T. Positive and negative regulation of SMC-DNA interactions by ATP and accessory proteins. EMBO J. 23:2004;2664-2673
13. Smith P.C., Karpowich N., Millen L., Moody J.E., Rosen J., Thomas P.J., Hunt J.F. ATP binding to the motor domain from an ABC transporter drives formation of a nucleotide sandwich dimer. Mol. Cell. 10:2002;139-149
14. Anderson D.E., Losada A., Erickson H.P., Hirano T. Condensin and cohesin display different arm conformations with characteristic hinge angles. J. Cell Biol. 156:2002;419-424
15. Haering C.H., Lowe J., Hochwagen A., Nasmyth K. Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;773-788
16. Strunnikov A.V., Larionov V.L., Koshland D. SMC1. An essential yeast gene encoding a putative head-rod-tail protein is required for nuclear division and defines a new ubiquitous protein family J. Cell Biol. 123:1993;1635-1648
17. Hopfner K.P., Tainer J.A. Rad50/SMC proteins and ABC transporters. Unifying concepts from high-resolution structures Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13:2003;249-255
18. Hopfner K.P., Karcher A., Craig L., Woo T.T., Carney J.P., Tainer J.A. Structural biochemistry and interaction architecture of the DNA double-strand break repair Mre11 nuclease and Rad50-ATPase. Cell. 105:2001;473-485
19. Hirano M., Anderson D.E., Erickson H.P., Hirano T. Bimodal activation of SMC ATPase by intra- and inter-molecular interactions. EMBO J. 20:2001;3238-3250
20. Kimura K., Hirano T. ATP-dependent positive supercoiling of DNA by 13S condensin. A biochemical implication for chromosome condensation Cell. 90:1997;625-634
21. Hopfner K.P., Karcher A., Shin D.S., Craig L., Arthur L.M., Carney J.P., Tainer J.A. Structural biology of Rad50 ATPase. ATP-driven conformational control in DNA double-strand break repair and the ABC-ATPase superfamily Cell. 101:2000;789-800
22. Scheffzek K., Ahmadian M.R., Kabsch W., Wiesmuller L., Lautwein A., Schmitz F., Wittinghofer A. The Ras-RasGAP complex. Structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants Science. 277:1997;333-338
23. Ciosk R., Shirayama M., Shevchenko A., Tanaka T., Toth A., Nasmyth K. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell. 5:2000;243-254
24. Lengronne A., Katou Y., Mori S., Yokobayashi S., Kelly G.P., Itoh T., Watanabe Y., Shirahige K., Uhlmann F. Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature. 430:2004;573-578