Selection through male function favors smaller floral display size in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea (convolvulaceae)

American Naturalist

Volumn 172, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 63-74

  Lau, Jennifer A ^a   Miller, Richard E ^b   Rausher, Mark D ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Floral display size; Geitonogamy; Male fitness; Morning glory; Plant mating systems; Selfing

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; AUTOGAMY; FITNESS; FLORA; GEITONOGAMY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ARTICLE; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; IPOMOEA; REPRODUCTION;

FLOWERS; IPOMOEA; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS);

CONVOLVULACEAE; IPOMOEA; IPOMOEA PURPUREA;

EID: 46349101364     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/588080     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Barrett, S. C. H. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358:991-1004.
2. Bawa, K. S. 1983. Patterns of flowering in tropical plants. Pages 394-410 in C. E. Jones and R. J. Little, eds. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Scientific and Academic Editions, New York.
3. Brown, B. A., and M. T. Clegg. 1984. Influence of flower polymorphisms on genetic transmission in a natural population of the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution 38:796-803.
4. Burd, M., and H. S. Callahan. 2000. What does the male function hypothesis claim? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13:735-742.
5. Chang, S.-M., and M. D. Rausher. 1998. Frequency-dependent pollen discounting contributes to maintenance of a mixed mating system in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. American Naturalist 152:671-683.
6. _. 1999. The role of inbreeding depression in maintaining the mixed mating system of the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution 53:1366-1376.
7. Crawford, T. J. 1984. What is a population? Pages 135-173 in B. Shorrocks, ed. Evolutionary ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
8. de Jong, T. J., P. G. L. Klinkhamer, and M. J. van Staalduinen. 1992. The consequences of pollination biology for selection of mass or extended blooming. Functional Ecology 6:606-615.
9. de Jong, T. J., N. M. Waser, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8:321-325.
10. Eckert, C. G. 2000. Contributions of autogamy and geitonogamy to self-fertilization in a mass-flowering, clonal plant. Ecology 81:532-542.
11. Edwards, A. W. F. 1972. Likelihood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Epperson, B. K., and M. T. Clegg. 1987. Frequency-dependent variation for outcrossing rate among flower-color morphs of Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution 41:1302-1311.
13. Fishbein, M., and L. D. Venable. 1996. Evolution of inflorescence design: theory and data. Evolution 50:2165-2177.
14. Fry, J. D., and M. D. Rausher. 1997. Selection on a floral color polymorphism in the tall morning glory (Ipomoea purpurea L.): transmission success of the alleles through pollen. Evolution 51: 66-78.
15. Gilman, L., and A. J. Rose. 1976. APL: an interactive approach. Wiley, New York.
16. Harder, L. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373:512-515.
17. _. 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. Pages 140-190 in D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman & Hall, New York.
18. Harder, L. D., C. Y. Jordan, W. E. Gross, and M. B. Routley. 2004. Beyond floricentrism: the pollination function of inflorescences. Plant Species Biology 19:137-148.
19. Hessing, M. B. 1988. Geitonogamous pollination and its consequences in Geranium caespitosum. American Journal of Botany 75: 1324-1333.
20. Hocking, D. R. 1985. The analysis of linear models. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.
21. Karron, J. D., R. J. Mitchell, K. G. Holmquist, J. M. Bell, and B. Funk. 2004. The influence of floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 92:242-248.
22. _. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 370-380.
23. Miller, R. E., M. D. Rausher, and P. S. Manos. 1999. Phylogenetic systematics of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) based on ITS and waxy sequences. Systematic Botany 24:209-227.
24. Morris, W. F., M. V. Price, N. M. Waser, J. D. Thomson, B. Thomson, and D. A. Stratton. 1994. Systematic increase in pollen carryover and its consequences for geitonogamy in plant populations. Oikos 71:431-440.
25. Ohashi, K., and T. Yahara. 2001. Behavioural responses of pollinators to variation in floral display size and their influences on the evolution of floral traits. Pages 274-296 in L. Chittka and J. D. Thomson, eds. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behavior and floral evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York.
26. Rademaker, M. C. J., and T. J. de Jong. 1998. Effects of flower number on estimated pollen transfer in natural populations of three hermaphroditic species: an experiment with fluorescent dye. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11:623-641.
27. Rausher, M. D., and J. D. Fry. 1993. Effects of a locus affecting floral pigmentation in Ipomoea purpurea on female fitness components. Genetics 134:1237-1247.
28. SAS Institute. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6. 4th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
29. Schoen, D. J., and M. T. Clegg. 1985. The influence of flower color on outcrossing rate and reproductive success in Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution 39:1242-1249.
30. Schoen, D. J., and M. Dubuc. 1990. The evolution of inflorescence size and number: a gamete-packaging strategy in plants. American Naturalist 135:841-857.
31. Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran. 1967. Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
32. Snow, A. A., T. P. Spira, R. Simpson, and R. A. Klips. 1996. The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. Pages 191-216 in D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman & Hall, New York.
33. Wolfram, H. 1991. Mathematica: a system for doing mathematics by computer. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA.