Secure mobility and the autonomous driver

IEEE Transactions on Robotics

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 688-697

  McDowell, Kaleb ^a   Nunez, Patrick ^b   Hutchins, Shaun ^c   Metcalfe, Jason S ^d  

^a U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b U S ARMY TARDEC   (United States)

^c ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d DCS CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Indirect vision; Military driving; Route planning; Supervisory control; Visual scanning

Indexed keywords

CONCURRENCY CONTROL; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; CONTROL THEORY; HEALTH; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; LUNAR MISSIONS; MILITARY DATA PROCESSING; UNMANNED VEHICLES; VEHICLES;

(ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC) STRESS; (I ,J) CONDITIONS; (U ,V) OPERATOR; CONCURRENT CONTROL; LOCAL ENVIRONMENTS; MANNED GROUND VEHICLES; MANNED VEHICLES; MANUAL DRIVING; MOBILITY SYSTEMS; MOTION SICKNESS; OPERATOR PERFORMANCE; OPERATOR WORKLOAD; POTENTIAL BENEFITS; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; REACTION TIMES; STRYKER; SYSTEM PERFORMANCES; UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE (UGV ); VEHICLE CONTROL; VEHICLE MISSION;

GROUND VEHICLES;

EID: 46349097215     PISSN: 15523098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2008.924261     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Unit of Action Maneuver Battle Lab. "The United States army objective force operational and organizational plan maneuver unit of action," TRADOC, Fort Knox, KY, 525-3-90 O&O, 2003.
2. C. Shoemaker, J. Bornstein, S. Myers, and B. Brendle, "Demo III: Department of defense testbed for unmanned ground mobility," in Proc. SPIE: AeroSense Session Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technol., vol. 3693, 1999, pp. 110-120.
3. E. J. Rossetter, J. R. Switkes, and J. C. Gerdes, "Experimental validation of the potential field lanekeeping system," Int. J. Autom. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 95-108, Jun. 2004.
4. M. Fineberg and O. M. Flascher, private communication, Jul. 2004 - Dec. 2005.
5. D. K. Mitchell, and K. S. Oie, private communication, Sep.-Nov. 2005.
6. P. Yih and J. C. Gerdes, "Modification of vehicle handling characteristics via steer-by-wire," IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 965-976, Nov. 2005.
7. S. Mammar, J. Sainte-Marie, and S. Glaser, "On the use of steer-by-wire systems in lateral driving assistance applications," in Proc. 10th IEEE Int. Workshop Robot Human Interactive Commun., 2001, pp. 487-492.
8. J. Kasselmann and T. Keranen, "Adaptive steering," Bendix Tech. J. vol. 2, pp. 26-35, 1969.
9. J. Ackermann and T. Bunte, "Yaw disturbance attenuation by robust decoupling of car steering," Control Eng. Practice, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1131-1136, 1997.
10. K. McDowell, K. S. Oie, T. M. Tierney, and O. M. Flascher, "Addressing human factors issues for future manned ground vehicles (MGVs)," Army AL&T, pp. 20-23, Jan.-Mar. 2007.
11. J. van Erp and P. Padmos, "Image parameters for driving with indirect viewing systems," Ergonomics, vol. 46, no. 15, pp. 1471-1499, Dec. 2003.
12. T. Fong, C. Thorpe, and C. Baur, "Advanced interfaces for vehicle teleoperation: Collaborative control, sensor fusion displays, and remote driving tools," Auton. Robot., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 77-85, 2001.
13. D. E. McGovern, "Technology assessment for command and control of teleoperated vehicles," Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Tech. Rep. SAND-87-1225, 1987.
14. D. E. McGovern and D. P. Miller, "Vision system testing for teleoperated vehicles," in Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Tech. Rep. SAND-88-3123, Mar. 1989.
15. D. J. Collins, D. Piccione, and P. S. Best, "Driver detection of drop-offs when using thermal and intensified imaging night vision devices," DCS Corporation, Alexandria, VA, Feb. 1998.
16. T. Sheridan, Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
17. C. D. Wickens, "The structure of attentional resources," in Attention and Performance VIII, R. S. Nickerson, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980, pp. 239-257.
18. D. K. Mitchell, C. L. Samms, T. Henthorn, and J. Q. Wojciechowski, "Trade study: A two- versus three-Soldier crew for the Mounted Combat System (MCS) and other future combat system platforms," Tech. Rep. ARL-TR-3026, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, Sep. 2003, 2008.
19. D. K. Mitchell, C. L. Samms, T. Henthorn, and J. Q. Wojciechowski, "Trade study: A two- versus three-soldier crew for the mounted combat system (MCS) and other future combat system platforms," U.S. Army Res. Lab., Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD, Rep. A 299 714, 2003 (ARL-TR-3026).
20. M. R. Endsley and D. B. Kaber, "Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task," Ergonomics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 462-492, Mar. 1999.
21. N. Stanton and M. S. Young, "Vehicle automation and driving performance," Ergonomics, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1014-1028, 1998.
22. T. B. Sheridan and R. Parasuraman, "Human vs. automation in responding to failures: An expected-value analysis," Hum. Factors, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 403-407, 2000.
23. R. Parasuraman and V. Riley, "Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse," Hum. Factors, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 230-253, Jun. 1997.
24. R. Rajamani and C. Zhu, "Semi-autonomous adaptive cruise control systems," IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1186-1192, Sep. 2002.
25. S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland, "Development of the NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of experimental and theoretical research," in Human Mental Workload, P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland, 1988, pp. 139-183.
26. R. S. Kennedy, N. E. Lane, M. G. Lilienthal, K. S. Berbaum, and L. J. Hettinger, "Profile analysis of simulator sickness symptoms: Application to virtual environment systems," Presence - Teleoper. Virtual Env., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 295-301, 1992.
27. R. H. Kerle and H. M. Bialek, "Measuring affective states by means of thurstone scaling techniques," Am. Psychol., vol. 13, no. 7, p. 416, 1958.
28. K. McDowell, T. McKnelly, P. Nunez, S. Hutchins, C. H. Perala, and B. S. Sterling, "The impact of automated route planning on Soldier-system performance," Tech. Rep. ARL-TR, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, to be published.
29. A. Steinfeld, "Interface lessons for fully and semi-autonomous mobile robots," in Proc. 2004 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom, New Orleans, LA, 2006, pp. 2752-2757.
30. J. W. Crandall, M. A. Goodrich, D. R. Olsen, and C. W. Nielsen, "Validating human-robot interaction schemes in multitasking environments," IEEE Trans. Syst. ManCybern. Part A - Syst.Hum., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 438-449, Jul. 2005.
31. B. Sellner, F. W. Heger, L. M. Hiatt, R. Simmons, and S. Singh, "Coordinated multiagent teams and sliding autonomy for large-scale assembly," Proc. IEEE, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 1425-1444, Jul. 2006.
32. R. R. Murphy and E. Rogers, "Cooperative assistance for remote robot supervision," Presence - Teleoper. Virtual Env., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 224-240, 1996.
33. T. Fong, C. Thorpe, and C. Bauer, "Robot, asker of questions," Robot. Auton. Syst., vol. 42, pp. 235-243, 2003.
34. T. Fong and C. Thorpe, "Vehicle teleoperation interfaces," Auton. Robot., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 9-18, 2001.
35. T. Fong, F. Conti, S. Grange, and C. Baur, "Novel interfaces for remote driving: Gesture, haptic and PDA," SPIE Teleminpulator Telepresence Technol. VII, Boston, MA, 2000, pp. 4195-4233.
36. M. A. Goodrich and M. Quigley, "Learning haptic feedback for guiding driver behavior," presented at the 2004 IEEE Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, The Hague, The Netherlands, Oct. 2004.
37. D. J. Cannon and G. Thomas, "Virtual tools for supervisory and collaborative control of robots [electronic version]," Presence - Teleoper. Virtual Env., vol. 6, pp. 1-28, 1997.
38. G. Terrien, T. Fong, C. Thorpe, and C. Baur, "Remote driving with a multisensor user interface," presented at the SAE ICES, Toulouse, France, 2000.
39. C. D.Wickens, "Imperfect and unreliable automation and its implications for attentional allocation, information access and situation awareness," Aviation Res. Lab Inst. Aviation, Savoy, IL, Rep. ARL-00-10/NASA-00-2, 2000.