Re-analysis of application of haemoclips for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding data

Gut

Volumn 57, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1023-1024

  Yuan, Y ^a   Wang, C ^a   Hunt, R H ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; CLIP; DATA ANALYSIS; HEMOSTASIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEPTIC ULCER BLEEDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEMOSTASIS, ENDOSCOPIC; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 46349091008     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Park CH, Sohn YH, Lee WS, et al. The usefulness of endoscopic hemoclipping for bleeding Dieulafoy lesions. Endoscopy 2003;35:388-392.
2. Chung IK, Kim EJ, Lee MS, et al. Bleeding Dieulafoy's lesions and the choice of endoscopic method: comparing the hemostatic efficacy of mechanical and injection methods. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:721-4.
3. Park CH, Joo YE, Kim HS, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing mechanical methods of hemostasis plus epinephrine injection to epinephrine injection alone for bleeding peptic ulcer. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:173-9.
4. Anon. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 4.2.6, September 2006.
5. Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, et al. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat Med 2007;26:53-77.