Sustainability by design: a reflection on the suitability of pedagogic practice in design and engineering courses in the teaching of sustainable design

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 135-142

  Morris, Richard ^a   Childs, Peter ^b   Hamilton, Tom ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Creativity; Engineering; Pedagogy; Product design; Sustainable design

Indexed keywords

EID: 46249132615     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03043790601118549     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Biggs, J., and Collis, K., 1982. Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy, New York: Academic Press.
2. Conway, Report. 1969. A National Design Council, London: Council of Engineering Institutions.
3. Cox, G., 2005. Review of Creativity in Business, London: Department of Trade and Industry.
4. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 9 February 2006. “ Market Transformation Programme. BNCK06; Kettle Trends ”. 9 February.
5. Duke University. 2005. Available online at: www.soc.duke.edu/resources/public_sociology/duke_outsourcing.pdf
6. Dutson, A., Todd, R., Magleby, S., and Sorenson, C., 1997. A review of teaching literature on engineering design through project orientated capstone courses. J. Engng Educ.,:. 1
7. EU Commission. 2005. Eco Design—an innovative path towards sustainable development. EU Commission Socrates 51388-IC-1-2005-1-RO-Erasmus-MOD
8. Fielden Report. 1963. Engineering Design, London: Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.
9. Finniston, Report. 1980. Engineering our Future, HMSO: Department of Industry.
10. Forum on Creativity in Engineering Education. 2006. International Journal of Engineering Education, May Available online at: http://www.ijee.dit.ie/forum/forum1home.html
11. Gereffi, G., and Wadhwa, V., 2005. “ Framing the engineering outsourcing debate: Placing the United States on a level playing field with China and India ”. Durham, USA: Duke University.
12. International Market News. 8 April 2004. “ Slovenia Market open to Kettle Culture ”. 8 April, Hong Kong Trade Development Council.
13. Kulacki, F., and Krueger, E., Trends in engineering education—an international perspective. International Conference on Engineering Education.
14. Lovins, H., Lovins, A., and Weizsacker, E., 1998. Factor 4, Germany: Rocky Mountain Institute/Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment & Energy.
15. Molina. New perpectives in engineering education, International Conference on Engineering Education. Proceedings of the International Journal of Engineering Education and Research. pp. 3
16. Morris, R., 2001-2004. University of Brighton, BSc (Hons) Product Design Module DP104 Innovation and XEM03 Innovation Strategy.
17. Morris, R., 2005. University of Brighton BSc (Hons) Product Design, Module DP301 Project. Independent Assessment by Davies, S. and Mortezaei, R
18. Owens, J. W., 1996. LCA impact assessment: a case study using a consumer product. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess, 1(4): 209-217.
19. Papanek, V., 1972. Design for the Real World, London: Thames & Hudson.
20. Roszac, T., Gnomes, M., and Kanner, A., 1995. Ecopyschology, Edited by: Roszac, T., Gnomes, M., and Kanner, A., San Francisco: Sierra Book Clubs.
21. UCAS (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service. May 2006. May, Available online at: http://www.ucas.ac.uk/25
22. Walter, N., 2006. All the organic broccoli in the world won’t be enough to save the planet. Guardian, 4 March
23. WWF. 2000. Global Warming and Terrestrial Biodiversity Decline.