Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in solid renal parenchymal lesions with maximum diameters of 5 cm

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 875-885

  Fan, Li ^a   Lianfang, Du ^a   Jinfang, Xing ^a   Yijin, Su ^a   Ying, Wu ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Clear cell carcinoma; Contrast agent; Contrast enhanced ultrasonography; Renal cell carcinoma; Small lesions

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE; TOMOGRAPHY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

CLEAR CELL CARCINOMA; CONTRAST AGENT; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASONOGRAPHY; RENAL CELL CARCINOMA; SMALL LESIONS;

DIAGNOSIS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; SONOVUE; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST PULSE SEQUENCING MODE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPERTROPHIED COLUMN OF BERLIN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KIDNEY ABSCESS; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY HEMANGIOMYOLIPOMA; KIDNEY INJURY; KIDNEY PARENCHYMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ONCOCYTOMA; PATHOLOGY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SOLID RENAL PARENCHYMAL LESION; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 46249125079     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.6.875     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Quaia E, Bussani R, Cova M, Mucelli RP. Radiologic-pathologic correlations of intratumoral tissue components in the most common solid and cystic renal tumors: pictorial review. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:1734-1744.
2. Kitamura H, Fujimoto H, Tobisu K, et al. Dynamic computed tomography and color Doppler ultrasound of renal parenchymal neoplasms: correlations with histopathological findings. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2004; 34:78-81.
3. Boozari B, Lotz J, Galanski M, Gebel M. Diagnostic imaging of liver tumors: current status [in German]. Internist (Berl) 2007; 48:8, 10-12, 14-16, 18-20.
4. Dai Y, Chen MH, Yin SS, et al. Focal liver lesions: Can SonoVue-enhanced ultrasound be used to differentiate malignant from benign lesions? Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 596-603.
5. Jinzaki M, Ohkuma K, Tanimoto A, et al. Small solid renal lesions: usefulness of power Doppler US. Radiology 1998; 209:543-550.
6. Axel H, Vincent R. Preoperative imaging in renal cell cancer. World J Urol 2004; 22:307-315.
7. Scialpi M, Di Maggio A, Midiri M, Loperfido A, Angelelli G, Rotondo A. Small renal masses: assessment of lesion characterization and vascularity on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fat suppression. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:751-757.
8. Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S, Gaeta M, Settineri N, Scribano E. Usefulness of power Doppler and contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of hyperechoic renal masses. Abdom Imaging 2001; 26:654-660.
9. Kabakci N, Igci E, Secil M, et al. Echo contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:747-753.
10. Matsumoto S, Minami T, Yamamoto Y, Nishioka T, Akiyama T, Onoue A. Efficacy of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis of renal mass lesions [in Japanese]. Hinyokika Kiyo 2001; 47:299-302.
11. Tamai H, Takiguchi Y, Oka M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of solid renal tumors. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:1635-1640.
12. Tranquart F, Correas JM, Martegani A, Greppi B, Bokor D. Feasibility of real time contrast enhanced ultrasound in renal disease [in French]. J Radiol 2004; 8531-36.
13. Park BK, Kim SH, Choi HJ. Characterization of renal cell carcinoma using agent detection imaging: comparison with gray-scale US. Korean J Radiol 2005; 6:173-178.
14. Quaia E, Siracusano S, Bertolotto M, Monduzzi M, Mucelli RP. Characterization of renal tumors with pulse inversion harmonic imaging by intermittent high mechanical index technique: initial results. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:1402-1412.
15. Mihara S, Kuroda K, Yoshioka R, Koyama W. Early detection of renal cell carcinoma by ultrasonographic screening: based on the results of 13 years screening in Japan. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25:1033-1039.
16. Zebedin D, Kammerhuber F, Uggowitzer MM, Szolar DH. Criteria for ultrasound differentiation of small angiomyolipomas (< or = 3 cm) and renal cell carcinomas [in German]. Rofo 1998; 169:627-632.
17. Siegel CL, Middleton WD, Teefey SA, McClennan BL. Angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma: US differentiation. Radiology 1996; 198:789-793.
18. Murphy WM, Beckwith JB, Farrow GM. Tumors of the kidney, bladder, and related urinary structures. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology. 3rd ed. Fascicle 11. Washington, DC; Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1993;92-174.
19. Gudbjartsson T, Hardarson S, Petursdottir V, Thoroddsen A, Magnusson J, Einarsson GV. Renal oncocytoma: a clinicopathological analysis of 45 consecutive cases. BJU Int 2005; 96:1275-1279.
20. Nagashima Y. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: clinical, pathological and molecular biological aspects. Pathol Int 2000; 50:872-878.
21. Hafron J, Fogarty JD, Hoenig DM, Li M, Berkenblit R, Ghavamian R. Imaging characteristics of minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma with histologic correlations. Urology 2005; 66:1155-1159.