IHG: An index for the hydro-geomorphological assessment of fluvial systems;IHG: Un índice para la valoración hidrogeomorfológica de sistemas fluviales

Limnetica

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 171-188

  Ollero Ojeda, Alfredo ^a   Ballar´ın Ferrer, Daniel ^c   D´ıaz Bea , Elena ^a   Mora Mur, Daniel ^c   Sánchez Fabre, Miguel ^a   Acín Naverac, Vanesa ^d   Echeverría Arnedo, María Teresa ^a   Granado García, David ^d   Ibisate Gonzalez de Matauco, Askoa ^b   Sánchez Gil, Lorena ^a   Sánchez Gil, Noelia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^c SL

^d SC

Author keywords

Assessment; Fluvial geomorphology; Fluvial hydrosystems; Hydrology; Hydromorphological indicators; Water framework directive 2000 60 EU

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; CONNECTIVITY; DISCHARGE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; HYDROLOGY; RIVER BED; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 46249104686     PISSN: 02138409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.23818/limn.27.14     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. AGENCES DE L'EAU & MINISTÈRE DE L'EN-VIRONNEMENT, 1998. SEQ-Physique: a system for the evaluation of the physical quality of watercourses. Paris, 15 pp.
2. ANDERSON, J. R. 1993. State of the Rivers Project. Report 1: Development and validation of the methodology. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, Australia, 64 pp.
3. BALLARÍN, D., D. MORA, E. DÍAZ, M. T. ECHEVERRÍA, A. IBISATE, R. MONTORIO, A. OLLERO y M. SÁNCHEZ FABRE. 2006. Valoración hidrogeomorfológica de los cursos fluviales de Aragón. Geographicalia, 49: 51-69.
4. th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics. Aquatic Habitats: analysis and restoration, I: 325-330.
5. BONADA, N., N. PRAT, A. MUNNÉ, M. PLANS, C. SOLÀ, M. ÁLVAREZ, I. PARDO, G. MOYÀ,
6. G. RAMON, M. TORO, S. ROBLES, J. AVILÉS, M.L. SUÁREZ, M.R. VIDAL-ABARCA, A. MELLADO, J.L. MORENO, C. GUERRERO, S. VIVAS, M. ORTEGA, J. CASAS, A. SÁNCHEZ-ORTEGA, P. JÁIMEZ-CUÉLLAR y J. ALBA-TERCEDOR. 2002. Intercalibración de la metodología GUADALMED. Selección de un protocolo de muestreo para la determinación del esta-do ecológico de los ríos mediterráneos. Limnetica, 21(3-4): 13-33.
7. BOON, P. J., J. WILKINSON & J. MARTIN. 1998. The application of SERCON (System for Evaluating Rivers for Conservation) to a selection of rivers in Britain. Aquatic Conservation. Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8(4): 597-616.
8. BRIERLEY, G. J. & K. A. FRYIRS. 2005. Geomorphology and river management. Applications of the River Styles Framework. Oxford: Blackwell, 398 pp.
9. BRINSON, M. M., R. D. RHEINHARDT, F. R. HAUER, L. C. LEE, W. L. NUTTER, R. D. SMITH & D. WHIGHAM. 1993. A guidebook for application of hydrogeomorphic assessments to riverine wetlands. Vicksburg: US Army Corps of Engineers, Wetlands Research Program, Technical Report WRP-DE-11. 112 pp. + appendix.
10. BUFFAGNI, A. & J. L. KEMP. 2002. Looking beyond the shores of the United Kingdom: addenda for the application of River Habitat Survey in Southern European rivers. Journal of Limnology, 61(2): 199-214.
11. DANÉS, C. (coord.) 2005. Manual para la identificación de las presiones y análisis del impacto en aguas superficiales. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, 71 pp.
12. DAVIES, N. M., R. H. NORRIS & M. C. THOMS. 2000. Prediction and assessment of local stream habitat features using large-scale catchment characteristics. Freshwat. Biol., 45: 343-369.
13. DÍAZ, E. y A. OLLERO. 2005. Metodología para la clasificación geomorfológica de los cursos fluvia-les de la cuenca del Ebro. Geographicalia, 47: 23-45.
14. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY. 2003. A refined geomorphological and floodplain component. River Habitat Survey FD 1921, GeoRHS fieldwork survey form and guidance manual. Warrington: DEFRA/EA Joint R&D-Project 11793, prepared by University of Newcastle, 51 pp.
15. FLEISCHHACKER, T. & K. KERN. 2002. Ecomorphological survey of large rivers. German Federal Institute of Hydrology, Koblenz, Alemania, 41 pp. + appendix.
16. GARCÍA DE JALÓN, D. & M. GONZÁLEZ DEL TÁNAGO. 2005. Critical approach to reference conditions current evaluation methods in rivers and an alternative proposal. In: Proceedings COST 626 European Aquatic Modelling Network. Final Meeting. 91-93, Silkeborg, Dinamarca.
17. GONZÁLEZ DEL TÁNAGO, M., D. GARCÍA DE JALÓN, F. LARA y R. GARILLETI. 2006. Índice RQI para la valoración de las riberas fluviales en el contexto de la Directiva Marco del Agua. Ingeniería Civil, 143: 97-109.
18. HAUER, F. R., B. J. COOK, M. C. GILBERT, E. J.Jr. CLAIRAIN & R. D. SMITH. 2002. A regional guidebook for applying the hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions of inter-montane prairie pothole wetlands in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Vicksburg: US Army Corps of Engineers, Wetlands Research Program, Technical Report ERDC-EL TR-02-7. 103 pp. + appendix.
19. JANSEN, A., A. ROBERTSON, L. THOMPSON & A. WILSON. 2005. Rapid appraisal of riparian condition. Version two. River and Riparian Land Management, Technical Guideline 4A. Canberra: Land & Water Australia, 18 pp.
20. KAMP, U., R. BOCK & K. HÖLZL. 2004. Assessment of river habitat in Brandenburg, Germany. Limnologica, 34: 176-186.
21. KLINE, M., C. ALEXANDER, S. POMEROY, S. JACQUITH, G. SPRINGSTON, B. CAHOON & L. BECKER. 2003. Stream Geomorphic Assessment Protocol Handbooks. Remote sensing and field surveys techniques for conducting watershed and reach level assessments. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, 151 pp.
22. th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium. 325-332. Institution of Engineers, Hobart, Australia.
23. LAWA. 2000. Gewässerstrukturgütebewertung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Verfahren für kleine und mittelgroße Fließgewässer. Berlin: Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser, 54 pp.
24. LEHOTSKÝ, M. & A. GREŠKOVÁ. 2004. Hydromorphological river survey and assessment (Slovakia). Bratislava: Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, 37 pp.
25. MALAVOI, J. R., J. P. BRAVARD, H. PIEGAY, E. HEROIN, E. et P. RAMEZ. 1998. Determination de l'espace de liberté des cours d'eau. SDAGE Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse, Lyon, Francia, 39 pp.
26. MOSELEY, R. K. 1999. Riparian inventory and proper functioning condition assessment of the Rocking M Wildlife Conservation Easement Area. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Idaho, USA, 147 pp.
27. th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics. Aquatic Habitats: analysis and restoration, I: 300-305.
28. MUNNÉ, A., C. SOLÀ y N. PRAT. 1998. QBR: un índice rápido para la evaluación de la calidad de los ecosistemas de ribera. Tecnología del agua, 175: 20-37.
29. MUNNÉ, A., C. SOLÀ y J. PAGÉS. 2006. HIDRI: Protocolo para la valoración de la calidad hidromorfológica de los ríos. Agència Catalana de l'Aigua, Barcelona, 160 pp.
30. NEWTON, B., C. PRINGLE & R. BJORKLAND. 1998. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol. National Water and Climate Center, Washington, USA, 36 pp.
31. OLLERO, A. 2003. El Ebro quiere volver a ser libre. Una dinámica fluvial activa es la clave para que haya ríos vivos. Quercus, 213: 34-38.
32. OLLERO, A. 2007. Territorio fluvial. Diagnóstico y propuesta para la gestión ambiental y de riesgos en el Ebro y los cursos bajos de sus afluentes. Bakeaz y Fundaciòn Nueva Cultura del Agua, Bilbao, 255 pp.
33. OLLERO, A., M. T. ECHEVERRÍA, M. SÁNCHEZ FABRE, V. AURÍA, D. BALLARÍN y D. MORA. 2003. Metodología para la tipificación hidromorfológica de los cursos fluviales de Aragón en aplicación de la Directiva Marco de Aguas (2000/60/CE). Geographicalia, 44: 7-25.
34. OLLERO, A., D. BALLARÍN, E. DÍAZ, D. MORA y M. SÁNCHEZ FABRE. 2006. Calidad hidromorfológica de los ríos de Aragón. Tecnología del Agua, 278, 36-41.
35. PARDO, I., M. ÁLVAREZ, J. CASAS, J. L. MORENO, S. VIVAS, N. BONADA, J. ALBA-TERCEDOR, P. JÁIMEZ-CUÉLLAR, G. MOYÀ, N. PRAT, S. ROBLES, M .L. SUÁREZ, M. TORO y M. R. VIDAL-ABARCA. 2002. El hábitat de los ríos mediterráneos. Disefío de un índice de diversidad de habitat. Limnetica, 21(3-4): 115-133.
36. PARSONS, M., M. THOMS & R. NORRIS. 2002. Australian river assessment system review of physical river assessment methods. A biological perspective. Monitoring River Health Initiative, Technical Report n° 21, Commonwealth of Australia and University of Canberra, 59 pp.
37. PEDERSEN, M. L. & A. BAATTRUP-PEDERSEN. 2003. Økologisk overvgning i vandloslash;b og p vandløbsncere arealer under N0VANA 2004-2009. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser. Teknisk Anvisning fra DMU nr. 21, Copenhage, Dinamarca, 89 pp.
38. PETERSEN, R. C. Jr. 1992. The RCE: a Riparian, Channel, and Environmental Inventory for small streams in the agricultural landscape. Freshwat. Biol., 27: 295-306.
39. PRICHARD, D., H. BARRETT, J. CAGNEY, R. CLARK, J. FOGG, K. GEBHART, P. L. HANSEN, B. MITCHELL, & D. TIPPY. 1993, rev. 1995, 1998. Riparian area management. Process for assessing proper functioning conditions. Bureau of Land Management Service Center, Denver, USA. 51pp.
40. RANKIN, E. T. 1991. The use of the qualitative habitat evaluation index for use attainability studies in streams and Rivers in Ohio. In: Biological criteria: research and regulation. Gibson, G. (ed.). EPA 440/5-91-005. Office of Water, Washington, USA, 167 pp.
41. RANKIN, E. T. 1995. Habitat indices in water resource quality assessments. In: Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. W. S. Davis & T.P. Simon (eds.): 181-208, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, USA.
42. RAVEN, P. J., P. J. BOON, F. H. DAWSON & A. J. D. FERGUSON. 1998. Towards an integrated aproach to classifying and evaluating rivers in UK. Aquatic Conservation. Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8: 383-393.
43. RAVEN, P. J., N. T. H. HOLMES, P. CHARRIER, F. H. DAWSON, M. NAURA & P. J. BOON. 2002. Towards a harmonized approach for hydromorpho-logical assessment of rivers in Europe: a qualitative comparison of three survey methods. Aquatic Conservation. Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 12: 405-424.
44. ROSGEN, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena, 22(3): 169-199.
45. ROSGEN, D. L. 1996. Applied river morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, USA, 314 pp.
46. ROWNTREE, K. M. & G. ZIERVOGEL. 1999. Development of an index of stream geomorphology for the assessment of river health. NAEBP Report Series 7. Institute for Water Quality Studies, Pretoria, Sudáfrica, 23 pp.
47. SILIGARDI, M. (Coord.) 2003. I.F.F. Indice de fun-zionalità fluviale. Agencia Nazionale per la Protezione deH'Ambiente, Roma, 225 pp.
48. SILIGARDI, M. e B. MAIOLINI. 1993. L'inventario delle caratteristiche ambientali dei corsi d'acqua alpini: guida all'uso della scheda RCE-2. Biologia Ambientale, VII (30): 18-24.
49. SMITH, R. D. & J. S. WAKELEY. 2001. Developing assessment models. Hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions: guidelines for developing regional guidebooks. US Army Corps of Engineers, Wetlands Research Program, Technical Report ERDC-EL TR-01-30, Vicksburg, USA, 31pp.
50. TARTAR, P. 2001. Mise en oeuvre du système d'eacute;valuation de la qualité physique des cours d'eau sur l'Andelle. Note de synthèse. DIREN Haute-Normandie, Francia, 8 pp.
51. WERRITTY, A. 1997. Short-term changes in channel stability. In: Applied fluvial geomorphology for river engineering and management, C. R. Thome, R. D. Hey & M. D. Newson (eds.): 47-65, Wiley, Chichester.
52. WHITE, L. J. & A. R. LADSON. 1999. An Index of Stream Condition Reference Manual. Department of Natural Resources and Environmen, Melbourne, Australia, 130 pp.
53. YETMAN, K. T. 2001. Stream corridor assessment survey. Watershed Restoration Division, Annapolis: Maryland, USA, 68 pp.