The 12 cc penn state pulsatile pediatric ventricular assist device: Flow field observations at a reduced beat rate with application to weaning

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 325-331

  Roszelle, Breigh N ^a   Cooper, Benjamin T ^a   Long, Tobias C ^a   Deutsch, Steven ^a   Manning, Keefe B ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT PATIENTS; BEAT RATES; FIELD OBSERVATIONS; HEART FAILURE; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT SYSTEM; MYOCARDIAL RECOVERY; NORMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; PEDIATRIC PATIENTS; PEDIATRIC VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; PENN STATE; RESIDENCE TIME; THROMBUS DEPOSITION; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; WALL SHEAR RATES;

BLOOD; FLOW PATTERNS; FLOW RATE; FLOW VISUALIZATION; METAL RECOVERY; PEDIATRICS;

SHEAR DEFORMATION;

ARTICLE; ASSISTED CIRCULATION; FLOW RATE; HEART FAILURE; HEART RATE; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HEMOSTASIS; MINIPUMP; SHEAR FLOW; THROMBOGENESIS; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BLOOD RHEOLOGY; CONGENITAL HEART MALFORMATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INFANT; NEWBORN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PULSATILE FLOW;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HEART RATE; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HEMORHEOLOGY; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PULSATILE FLOW;

EID: 46249086835     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181695cfe     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Heart Association: Statistical Reference Book, Texas,2005.
2. Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation: Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1996-2005, Maryland, 2006.
3. Dellgren G, Koirala B, Sakopoulus A, et al: Pediatric heart transplantation: Improving results in high-risk patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 21: 782-791, 2001.
4. Karl TR, Horton B: Options for mechanical support in pediatric patients, in Goldstein DJ, Oz MC (eds), Cardiac Assist Devices. New York, Futurea Publishing Co, 2000, pp. 37-62.
5. Black MD, Coles JG, Williams WG, et al: Determinants of successes in pediatric cardiac patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg 60: 133-138, 1995.
6. Kawahito S, Maeda T, Motomura T, et al: Hemolytic characteristics of oxygenators during clinical extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 48: 636-639, 2002.
7. Dang NC, Topkara VK, Kim BT, et al: Clinical outcomes in patients with chronic congestive heart failure who undergo left ventricular assist device implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130: 1302-1309, 2005.
8. Kalya AV, Tector AJ, Crouch JD, et al: Comparison of novacor and heartmate vented electric left ventricular assist devices in a single institution. J Heart Lung Transplant 24: 1973-1975,2005.
9. Weitkemper HH, El-Banayosy A, Arusoglu L, et al: Mechanical circulatory support: Reality and dreams experience of a single center. J Extra Corpor Technol 36: 169-173, 2004.
10. Copeland JG, Arabia FA, Tsau PH, et al: Total artificial hearts: Bridge to transplantation. Cardiol Clin 21: 101-113, 2003.
11. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al: Randomized evaluation of mechanical assistance for the treatment of congestive heart failure (REMATCH) study group. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med 345: 1435-1443, 2001.
12. Beghetti M, Rimensberger PC: Mechanical circulatory support in pediatric patients. Intensive Care Med 26: 350-352, 2000.
13. Baldwin JT, Borovetz HS, Duncan BW, et al: The national heart, lung, and blood institute pediatric circulatory support program.Circulation 113: 147-155, 2006.
14. Frazier OH, Myers TJ: Left ventricular assist system as a bridge to myocardial recovery. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 734-741, 1999.
15. Mancini DM, Beniaminovitz A, Levin H, et al: Low incidence of myocardial recovery after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 98:2383-2389, 1998.
16. Frazier OH, Benedict CR, Radovancevic B, et al: Improved left ventricular function after chronic left ventricular unloading. Ann Thorac Surg 62: 675-682, 1996.
17. Hetzer R, Loebe M, Potapov EV, et al: Circulatory support with pneumatic paracorporeal ventricular assist device in infants and children. Ann Thorac Surg 66: 1498-1506, 1998.
18. Duncan BW, Bohn DJ, Atz AM, et al: Mechanical circulatory support for the treatment of children with acute fulminant myocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122: 440-448, 2001.
19. Slaughter MS, Silver MA, Farrar DJ, et al: A new method of monitoring recovery and weaning the Thoratec left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 71: 215-218, 2001.
20. Slaughter MS, Sobieski MA, Koenig SC, et al: Left ventricular assist device weaning: Hemodynamic response and relationship to stroke volume and rate reduction protocols. ASAIO J 52: 228-233, 2006.
21. Hochareon P, Manning KB, Fontaine AA, et al: Correlation of invivo clot deposition with the flow characteristics in the 50 cc Penn State artificial heart: A preliminary study. ASAIO J 50:537-542, 2004.
22. Deutsch S, Tarbel JM, Manning KB, et al: Experimental fluid mechanics of pulsatile artificial blood pumps. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 38: 65-86, 2006.
23. Baldwin JT, Deutsch S, Geselowitz DB, Tarbell JM: LDA measurements of mean velocity and reynolds stress fields within an artificial heart ventricle. J Biomech Eng 116: 190-200, 1994.
24. Mandrusov E, Puszkin E, Vroman L, Leonard EF: Separated flows in artificial organs. A cause of early thrombogenesis? ASAIO J 42: M506-M513, 1996.
25. Kim J, Ryu G, Shin I, et al: Effect of shear rates on protein adsorption in the total artificial heart. ASAIO J 38: M532-M535, 1992.
26. Bachmann C, Hugo G, Rosenberg G, et al: Fluid dynamics of a pediatric ventricular assist device. Artificial Organs 25: 362-372, 2000.
27. Manning KB, Wivholm BD, Yang N, et al: The flow behavior within the Penn State 12 cc pulsatile pediatric ventricular assist device. Artificial Organs 2008 (in press).
28. Cooper BT, Roszelle BN, Long T, et al: The 12 cc Penn State pulsatile pediatric ventricular assist device: Fluid dynamics associated with valve selection. ASME J Biomech Eng 2008 (inpress).
29. Hochareon P, Manning KB, Fontaine AA, et al: Wall shear-rate estimation within the 50cc Penn State artificial heart using particle image velocimetry. J Biomech Eng 126: 430-437, 2004.
30. Hubbell JA, McIntire LV: Visualization and analysis of mural thrombogenesis on collage, polyurethane and nylon. Biomaterials7: 354-363, 1986.
31. Cochrane T, Kenyon CJ, Lawford PV, et al: Validation of the orifice formula for estimating effective heart valve opening area. Clin Phys Physiol Meas12: 21-37, 1990.
32. Rosenberg G, Phillips WM, Landis D, Pierce WS: Design and evaluation of the Pennsylvania State University mock circulatory system. ASAIO J4: 41-49, 1981.
33. Long JA, Undar A, Manning KB, Deutsch S: Viscoelasticity of pediatric blood and its implications for the testing of a pulsatile pediatric blood pump. ASAIO J 51: 563-566, 2005.
34. Hart DP: Super-resolution PIV processing by recursive localcorrelation. J Visualization 10: 187-194, 1999.