Proximal bone remodelling differed between two types of titanium long femoral components after cementless revision arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 431-436

  Iwana, Daiki ^a,b   Nishii, Takashi ^a   Miki, Hidenobu ^c   Sugano, Nobuhiko ^a   Sakai, Takashi ^a   Ohzono, Kenji ^c   Yoshikawa, Hideki ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Kyowakai Hospital   (Japan)

^c National Hospital Organization   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE ATROPHY; BONE MASS; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE REMODELING; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 46149127115     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0357-2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, Engh CA, Miller JE, Brooks CE (1992) Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:79-96
2. Bohm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(7):1023-1031
3. Bojescul JA, Xenos JS, Callaghan JJ, Savory CG (2003) Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(6):1079-1083
4. D'Aubigne RM, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36-A(3):451-475
5. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(1):45-55
6. Engh CA, Culpepper WJ 2nd, Kassapidis E (1998) Revision of loose cementless femoral prostheses to larger porous coated components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 347:168-178
7. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Griffin WL, Mayer JG (1988) Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:91-110
8. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Suthers KE (1990) The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261:63-81
9. Engh CA Jr, Culpepper WJ 2nd, Engh CA (1997) Long-term results of use of the anatomic medullary locking prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(2):177-184
10. Greer RB 3rd (1993) Wolff's law. Orthop Rev 22(10):1087-1088
11. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17-27
12. Gustilo RB, Pasternak HS (1988) Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:111-119
13. Hartwig CH, Bohm P, Czech U, Reize P, Kusswetter W (1996) The Wagner revision stem in alloarthroplasty of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115(1):5-9
14. Hayashi K, Inadome T, Mashima T, Sugioka Y (1993) Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 27(5):557-563
15. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Dalstra M (1989) Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 12:1255-1267
16. Hussamy O, Lachiewicz PF (1994) Revision total hip arthroplasty with the BIAS (Biologic Ingrowth Anatomic System) femoral component. Three to six-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(8):1137-1148
17. Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R (2000) The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 24(3):139-142
18. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG (1997) 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 12(8):839-847
19. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR (1994) Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(7):965-973
20. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML (1995) Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 319:141-150
21. Paprosky WG, Burnett RS (2002) Assessment and classification of bone stock deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 31(8):459-464
22. Schramm M, Keck F, Hohmann D, Pitto RP (2000) Total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented femoral component with taper design: outcome at 10-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120(7-8):407-412
23. Smith SE, Harris WH (1997) Total hip arthroplasty performed with insertion of the femoral component with cement and the acetabular component without cement. Ten to thirteen-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(12):1827-1833
24. Suominen S, Santavirta S (1996) Revision total hip arthroplasty in deficient proximal femur using a distal load-bearing prosthesis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 85(3):253-262
25. Suominen S, Santavirta S (1996) Revision total hip replacement using the bias proximal porous-coated femoral component. Ann Chir Gynaecol 85(4):347-351
26. Venesmaa PK, Kroger HP, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, Suomalainen OT, Alhava EM (2001) Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-a 3-year follow-up study. J Bone Miner Res 16(6):1056-1061
27. Weber M, Hempfing A, Orler R, Ganz R (2002) Femoral revision using the Wagner stem: results at 2-9 years. Int Orthop 26(1):36-39