Distributed simulation in industry - A survey part 1 - The cots vendors

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1053-1060

  Boer, Csaba Attila ^a   De Bruin, Arie ^b   Verbraeck, Alexander ^c  

^a TBA Nederland   (Netherlands)

^b Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mathematics and Computer Science ^*  (Netherlands)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRY; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; STANDARDS;

COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF (COTS); DISTRIBUTED SIMULATIONS; IN ORDER; SIMULATION PACKAGES;

SURVEYS;

EID: 46149125558     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2006.323194     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Boer, C. A. 2005. Distributed Simulation in Industry, Ph.D. Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Available via 〈https://ep.eur.nl/handle/1765/6325〉 [accessed June 22, 2006]
2. Boer, C.A, A. de Bruin, and A. Verbraeck. 2006a. Distributed Simulation in Industry - A Survey, Part 2 - Experts on Distributed Simulation, Accepted in Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, eds. L. F. Perrone, F. P. Wieland, J. Liu, B. G. Lawson, D. M. Nicol, and R. M. Fujimoto. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
3. Boer, C.A, A. Bruin, and A. Verbraeck. 2006b. The Use of Distributed Simulation in Industry - A Survey, Submitted to the Simulation: Transactions of The Society for Modeling and Simulation International.
4. nd ed., Thousand Oaks, California, USA. SAGE Publications.
5. DMSO. 1998a. High Level Architecture Object Rules v1.3, Technical Report, Defense Modeling and Simulation Office.
6. DMSO. 1998b. High Level Architecture Interface Specification vl.3, Technical Report, Defense Modeling and Simulation Office.
7. DMSO. 1998c. High Level Architecture Object Model Template vl.3, Technical Report, Defense Modeling and Simulation Office.
8. Fujimoto, R. M. 2000. Parallel and Distributed Simulation Systems, New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
9. Kenis, D. 1995. Improving Group Decisions. Designing and Testing Techniques for Group Decisions Support Systems Applying Delphi Principles. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utrecht, Faculty of Social Sciences.
10. Kuhl, F., R. Weatherly, and J. Dahmann. 1999. Creating Computer Simulation Systems: An Introduction to the High Level Architecture, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.
11. Law, A. M., and W. D. Kelton. 2000. Simulation Modeling and Analysis, Boston, USA: McGraw-Hill.
12. Linstone, H. A. 1978. The Delphi Technique, in Handbook of Future Research, ed. J. Fowles, London: Greenwood Press, pp. 273-300.
13. Linstone, H. A., and M. Turoff. 1975. The Delphi Method. Techniques and Applications., London, UK: Addison-Wesley.
14. McLean, C., and F. Riddick. 2000. The IMS MISSION Architecture for Distributed Manufacturing Simulation, in Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for Computing Machinery Press, pp. 1539 - 1548.
15. Nikoukaran, J., V. Hlupic, and R. J. Paul. 1999. A Hierarchical Framework for Evaluating Simulation Software, Journal of Simulation Practice and Theory (SIMPRA), 7(3), pp. 219-232.
16. Rabe, M., F. W. Jaekel, and F. F. De Gurtubai. 2001. Modelling and Simulation for Globally Distributed Enterprises, in The 4th International EUROSIM 2001 Congress, Delft, The Netherlands.
17. Revetria, R., P. E. J. N. Blomjous, and S. P. A. Van Houten. 2003. An HLA Federation for Evaluating Multi-Drop Strategies in Logistics, in European Simulation Symposium and Exhibition Conference, Delft, The Netherlands.
18. Seale, C., G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, and D. Silverman. 2004. Qualitative Research Practice, London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
19. Singhal, S., and M. Zyda. 1999. Networked Virtual Environments. Design and Implementation, New York, USA: ACM Press. Addison Wesley.
20. Straßburger, S. 2001. Distributed Simulation Based on the High Level Architecture in Civilian Application Domains, PhD Thesis, University Otto-von-Guericke.
21. Swain, J. J. 1995. Tools for Process Understanding and Improvement: Simulation Software Survey, OR/MS Today, 22(4), pp. 64-79.
22. Swain, J. J. 1997. Simulation Software Survey: Simulation Goes Mainstream, OR/MS Today, pp. 35-46.
23. Swain, J. J. 2001. Power Tools for Visualization and Decision Making: 2001 Simulation Software Survey, OR/MS Today, 28(1), pp. 52-63.
24. Taylor, S. J. E., A. Bruzzone, R. Fujimoto, B. P. Gan, S. Straßburger, and R. J. Paul. 2002. Distributed Simulation and Industry: Potentials and Pitfalls, in Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
25. Taylor, S. J. E., B. P. Gan, S. Straßburger, and A. Verbraeck. 2003. HLA-CSPIF Panel on Commercial Off-the-Shelf Distributed Simulation, in Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
26. Taylor, S. J. E., X. G. Wang, S. J. Turner, and M. Y. Low. 2006. Integrating Heterogeneous Distributed COTS Discrete-Event Simulation Packages: An Emerging Standards-Based Approach, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 36(1), pp. 109-122.
27. Tewoldeberhan, T. W., A. Verbraeck, E. C. Valentin, and G. Bardonnet. 2002. An Evaluation and Selection Methodology for Discrete-Event Simulation Software, in Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers.