Earthquake damage estimation in Metro Manila, Philippines based on seismic performance of buildings evaluated by local experts' judgments

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 10-11, 2008, Pages 764-777

  Miura, Hiroyuki ^a   Midorikawa, Saburoh ^a   Fujimoto, Kazuo ^b   Pacheco, Benito M ^c   Yamanaka, Hiroaki ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b CHIBA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c Vibrametrics Inc   (Philippines)

Author keywords

Building damage estimation; Capacity spectrum method; Delphi method; Local experts; Metro Manila; Seismic performance

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); CURVES (ROAD); DECISION MAKING; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; EARTHQUAKES; ESTIMATION; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

BUILDING DAMAGED; BUILDING PERFORMANCE; CAPACITY CURVES; CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD (CSM); DAMAGE ESTIMATIONS; DAMAGE RATIOS; DELPHI METHODS; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGES; ELSEVIER (CO); FRAGILITY CURVES; GROUND MOTIONS; LOCAL EXPERTS (LE); METRO MANILA; PHILIPPINES; PUSH-OVER ANALYSIS; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING;

BUILDINGS;

BUILDING; DELPHI ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUND MOTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

ASIA; EURASIA; MANILA; NATIONAL CAPITAL; PHILIPPINES; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

EID: 46149121047     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). HAZUS99 SR2 technical manual. Washington, DC, 1999.
2. United Nations Initiative Towards Earthquake Safe Cities. Risk assessment tools for diagnosis of urban areas against seismic disasters (RADIUS). International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction, 2000.
3. GeoHazards International and United Nations Center for Regional Development (UNCRD) Disaster Management Planning Hyogo Office. Global earthquake safety initiative (GESI). Pilot project. Final report, 2001.
4. Midorikawa S, Fujimoto K, Arai J. Preliminary assessment of building damage due to a scenario earthquake in Metro Manila, Philippines. Paper no. LE-1f. In: Proceedings of the 7th US national conference on earthquake engineering; 2002.
5. Hasegawa K, Hayashi H, Topping K, Maki N, Tatsuki S, Banba M, et al. Development of participatory seismic risk assessment procedure that reflects community needs: a case report from Marikina City, Metro Manila, Philippines. Paper no. 2256. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering; 2004.
6. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA), Philippines Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS). Earthquake impact reduction study for Metropolitan Manila, Republic of the Philippines. Final report, 2004.
7. Applied Technical Council (ATC). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (1996), ATC-40, Redwood City
8. Chopra A.K., and Goel R.K. Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum. Earthquake Spectra 15 4 (1999) 637-656
9. Doi K, Kim K. Role of strategic modeling approach in the formulation of the framework of sustainable metropolitan policies. In: Proceedings of 1st workshop on environment conservation of Metro Manila; 1998. p. 13-25.
10. Matsuda I., Enomoto T., Banganan E.L., and Narag I.C. Regional division of Metro Manila on the basis of geological and geomorphological conditions. Bull Inst Sci Technol, Kanto Gakuin Univ 25 (1998) 101-112
11. Daligdig JA, Besana GM. Seismological hazards in Metro Manila. In: Proceedings of the natural disaster prevention and mitigation in metropolitan Manila area. UNCHS (Habitat) Project INT/90/70; 1993. p. 9-41.
12. Nelson A., Personius S.F., Rimando R.E., Punongbayan R.S., Tungol N., Mirabueno H., et al. Multiple large earthquakes in the past 1500 years on a fault in Metropolitan Manila, The Philippines. Bull Seism Soc Am 90 (2000) 73-85
13. Kamae K., Irikura K., and Pitarka A. A technique for simulating strong ground motion using hybrid Green's function. Bull Seism Soc Am 88 (1998) 357-367
14. Irikura K., and Kamae K. Strong ground motions during the 1948 Fukui earthquake-estimation of broad-band ground motion using a hybrid simulation technique. J Seisimol Soc Jpn 52 (1999) 129-150 (in Japanese with English abstract)
15. Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB. SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Report no. EERC 72-12. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley; 1972.
16. Irikura K., and Miyake H. Prediction of strong ground motions for scenario earthquakes. J Geol 110 6 (2001) 849-875 (in Japanese with English abstract)
17. Yamanaka H, Takezono M, Ogata Y, Eto K, Banganan EL, Narag IC, et al. Estimation of S-wave velocity profiles in Metro Manila from long-period microtremor array measurement. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on the integration of data for seismic disaster mitigation in Metro Manila; 2000. p. 13-29.
18. Imazu M, Fukutake K. Dynamic shear modulus and damping of gravel material. In: Proceedings of 21th Japan national conference on soil mechanics and foundations engineering; 1986. p. 509-12 (in Japanese).
19. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). 1/10,000 scale urban contoured map. Report on establishment of graphic information base project of the national capital region, Republic of the Philippines, 1989.
20. Miura H., and Midorikawa S. Updating GIS building inventory data using high-resolution satellite images for earthquake damage assessment. Earthquake Spectra 22 4 (2006) 151-168
21. Yamazaki F, Mitomi H, Yusuf Y, Matsuoka M. Urban classification of Metro Manila for seismic risk assessment using satellite images. In: Proceedings of 5th multi-lateral workshop on development of earthquake and Tsunami disaster mitigation technologies and their integration for the Asia-Pacific Region; 2003. p. 1-8 (CD-ROM).
22. Vibrametrics Inc. Survey among building officials and local government engineers on population distribution in Metro Manila. EqTAP Metro Manila case study, Final report, 2003.
23. Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. National structural code of the Philippines (NSCP). First edition, 1972.
24. Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. National structural code of the Philippines (NSCP). Second edition, 1981.
25. Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. National structural code of the Philippines (NSCP). Third edition, 1986.
26. Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. National structural code of the Philippines (NSCP). Fourth edition, 1992.
27. Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. National structural code of the Philippines (NSCP). Fifth edition, 2001.
28. Vibrametrics Inc. Survey of experts' judgment on earthquake capacity of selected building types in Metro Manila. EqTAP Metro Manila case study, Final report, 2003.
29. Linstone H.A., and Turoff M. The Delphi method: techniques and application (2002), Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co.
30. Applied Technical Council (ATC). Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Report ATC-13. Redwood City, 1985.
31. Vibrametrics Inc. Development of fragility curves for selected building types. EqTAP Metro Manila case study, Final report, 2003.
32. Seismo Struct. Computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structure. 〈http://www.seismosoft.com〉, 2002.
33. Vibrametrics Inc. Pushover analysis of an internal frame of a standard 2-story school building. Final report of EqTAP Metro Manila case study, 2003.
34. Vibrametrics Inc. Pushover analysis of an internal frame of a 10-story sub-type3 (oldest) C1H building. Final report of EqTAP Metro Manila case study, 2003.
35. Suzuki S., Tanaka S., Horie K., Maki N., Mizukoshi K., Ohmori T., et al. A study on dynamic parameter properties and earthquake response characteristics of non-engineered housings in Marikina city, Philippines. J Soc Safety Sci 7 (2005) 1-8 (in Japanese with English abstract)