Surface rupturing and buried dynamic-rupture models calibrated with statistical observations of past earthquakes

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1147-1161

  Dalguer, Luis A ^a,b   Miyake, Hiroe ^c   Day, Steven M ^b   Kikura, Kojiro ^d  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d AICHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; ADDITION REACTIONS; DROPS; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; EARTHQUAKES; FLUID MECHANICS; FRACTURE ENERGY; FRACTURE FIXATION; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; PHOTOACOUSTIC EFFECT; RUPTURE DISKS; SEISMOLOGY; STATISTICAL METHODS; STATISTICS;

(1 1 0) SURFACE; (ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC) STRESS; AVERAGE STRESS; DIRECTIVITY; DROP CHARACTERISTICS; DROP DISTRIBUTION; DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODELS; DYNAMIC STRESSING; EARTHQUAKE SIZE; FAULT MODELING; FREE SURFACES; GROUND MOTIONS; HIGH-FREQUENCY (HF); HYPOCENTER LOCATIONS; LARGE AREAS; NEGATIVE STRESS; RUPTURE MODELS; SEISMIC MOMENTS; SELF SIMILARITIES; SLIP VELOCITY; SLIP-WEAKENING FRICTION; SOURCE MODELING; STRESS DROP; STRESS STATES;

DYNAMIC MODELS;

EARTHQUAKE HYPOCENTER; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; GROUND MOTION; MODELING; SEISMIC SOURCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRESS;

EID: 46149119211     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120070134     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. L using seismograms recorded at 2.5 km depth, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 24,015-24,036.
2. Abercrombie, R. E., and J. R. Rice (2005). Can observations of earthquake scaling constrain slip weakening?, Geophys. J. Int. 162, 4136-424.
3. Andrews, D. J. (1976). Rupture velocity of plane-strain shear cracks, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 5679-5687.
4. Andrews, D. J. (2005). Rupture dynamics with energy loss outside the slip zone, J. Geophys. Res. 110, B01307, doi 10.1029/ 2004JB003191.
5. Asano, K., T. Iwata, and K. Irikura (2005). Estimation of source rupture process and strong ground motion simulation of the 2002 Denali, Alaska, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95, 1701-1715.
6. Bouchon, M. (1997). The state of stress on some faults of the San Andreas system as inferred from nearfield strong motion data, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 11,731-11,744.
7. Bouchon, M., H. Sekiguchi, K. Irikura, and T. Iwata (1998). Some characteristics of the stress field of the 1995 Hyongo-ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24,271-24,282.
8. Dalguer, L. A., and S. M. Day (2006). Comparison of fault representation methods in finite difference simulations of dynamic rupture, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, 1764-1778.
9. Dalguer, L. A., and S. M. Day (2007). Staggered-grid split-nodes method for spontaneous rupture simulation, J. Geophys. Res. 112, B02302, doi 10.102912006JB004467.
10. Dalguer, L. A., S. M. Day, K. Olsen, and Y. Cui (2006). Implementation of the staggered-grid split-node method in a MPI finite difference code for large scale models of spontaneous dynamic rupture simulation, in 2006 SCEC Annual Meeting Proceedings and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Southern California Earthquake Center, Los Angeles.
11. Dalguer, L. A, K. Irikura, and J. Riera (2003a). Generation of new cracks accompanied by the dynamic shear rupture propagation of the 2000 Tottori (Japan) earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 2236-2252.
12. Dalguer, L. A., K. Irikura, and J. Piera (2003b). Simulation of tensfle crack generation by 3D dynamic shear rupture propagation during an earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 108, no. B3, 2144, doi 10.1029/2001JB001738.
13. Dalguer, L. A., K. Irikum, J. Riera, and H. C. Chiu (2001). The importance of the dynamic source effects on strong ground motion during the 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake: brief interpretation of the damage distribution on buildings, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95, 1112-1127.
14. Dalguer, L. A., K. Irikura, W. Zhang, and J. Riera (2002). Distribution of dynamic and static stress changes during 2000 Tottori (Japan) earthquake: brief interpretation of the earthquake sequences; foreshocks, main shock and aftershocks, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, no. 16, 1758, doi 10.1029/2001GL014333.
15. Dalguer, L. A., H. Miyake, and K. Irikura (2004). Paper No. 3286, Characterization of dynamic asperity source models for simulating strong ground motion, in Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (13WCEE), Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1-6 August 2004.
16. Das, S., and K. Aki (1977). Fault planes with barriers: a versatile earthquake model, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 5648-5670.
17. Day, S. M. (1982a). Three-dimensional finite difference simulation of fault dynamics: rectangular faults with fixed rupture velocity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 705-727.
18. Day, S. M. (1982b). Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: the effect of nonuniform prestress, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 1881-1902.
19. Day, S. M., S. H. Gonzalez, R. Anooshehpoor, and J. N. Brune (2008). Scale-model and numerical simulations of near-fault seismic directivity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 1186-1206.
20. Day, S. M., G. Yu, and D. J. Wald (1998). Dynamic stress changes during earthquake rupture, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, 512-522.
21. Guatteri, M., and P. Spudich (2000). What can strong-motion data tell us about slip-weakening fault-friction laws?, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 98-116.
22. Hanks, T. C. (1977). Earthquake stress drops, ambient tectonic stresses and stresses that drive plate motions, Pure Appl. Geophys. 115, 441-458.
23. Hanks, T. C., and W. H. Bakun (2002). A bilinear source-scaling model for M-log A observations of continental earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 1841-1846.
24. Ide, S. (2002). Estimation of radiated energy of finite-source earthquake models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 2994-3005.
25. Ide, S., and M. Takeo (1997). Determination of constitutive relations of fault slip based on seismic waves analysis, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 27,379-27,391.
26. Irikura, K., and H. Miyake (2001). Prediction of strong ground motions for scenario earthquakes, J. Geograph. 110, 849-875 (in Japanese with English abstract).
27. Irikura, K., H. Miyake, T. Iwata, K. Kamae, H. Kawabe, and L. A. Dalguer (2004). Paper No. 1371, Recipe for predicting strong ground motion from future large earthquake, in Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (13WCEE), Vancouver, B. C., Canada, 1-6 August 2004. i
28. Kagawa, T., K. Irikura, and P. Somerville (2004). Differences in ground motion and fault rupture process between surface and buried rupture earthquakes, Earth Planets Space 56, 3-14.
29. Kanamori, H., and D. Anderson (1975). Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65, 1073-1095.
30. L using TERRAscope, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 83, 330-346.
31. Mai, P. M., and G. C. Beroza (2000). Source-scaling properties from finite-fault rupture models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 604-615.
32. Mai, P. M., P. Somerville, A. Pitarka, L. Dalguer, S. G. Song, G. Beroza, H. Miyake, and K. Irikura (2006). On scaling of fracture energy and stress drop in dynamic rupture models: consequences for near-source ground motions, in Earthquakes: Radiated Energy and the Physics of Faulting, R. Abercrombie, A. McGarr, H. Kanamori and G. Di Toro (Editors), American Geophysical Monograph 170, 283-293.
33. Mai, P. M., P. Spudich, and J. Boatwright (2005). Hypocenter locations in finite-source rupture models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95, 965-980.
34. Marone, C., and C. Scholz (1988). The depth of seismic faulting and the upper transition from stable to unstable slip regimes, Geophys. Res. Lett. 15, 621-624.
35. Mikumo, T., K. B. Olsen, E. Fukuyama, and Y, Yagi (2003). Stress-breakdown time and slip-weakening distance inferred from slip-velocity functions on earthquake faults, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 264-282.
36. Miyake, H., T. Iwata, and K. Irikura (2003). Source characterization for broadband ground-motion simulalion: kinematic heterogeneous source model and strong motion generation area, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 2531-2545.
37. Miyakoshi, K. (2002). Source characterization for heterogeneous source model, Chikyu Mon. Extra 37, 4247 (in Japanese).
38. Oglesby, D. D., R. J. Archuleta, and S. B. Nielsen (1998). Earthquakes on dipping faults: the effects of broken symmetry, Science 280, 1055-1059.
39. Olsen, K. B., S. M. Day, J. B. Minster, Y. Cui, A. Chourasia, M. Faerman, R. Moore, P. Maechling, and T. Jordan (2006). Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L07305, doi 10.1029/2005GRL025472.
40. w 7.7 earthquakes on the southern San Andreas fault, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 1162-1185.
41. Olsen, K. B., R. Madariaga, and R. Archuleta (1997). Three dimensional dynamic simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake, Science 278, 834-838.
42. Peyrat, S., K. Olsen, and R. Madariaga (2001). Dynamic modeling of the 1992 Landers earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 26,467-26,482.
43. Poliakov, A. N. B., R. Dmowska, and J. R. Rice (2002). Dynamic shear rupture interactions with fault bends and off-axis secondary faulting, J. Geophys. Res. 107, no. B11, 2295, doi 10.1029/ 2001JB000572.
44. Pulido, N., and K. Irikura (2000). Estimation of dynamic rupture parameters from the radiated seismic energy and apparent stress, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 3945-3948.
45. Rice, J. R., C. G. Sammis, and R. Parsons (2005). Off-fault secondary failure induced by a dynamic slip pulse, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95, 109-134.
46. Scholz, C. H. (1982). Scaling laws for large earthquakes: consequences for physical models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 1-14.
47. Scholz, C. H. (2002). The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting Cambridge U Press, New York.
48. Sekiguchi, H., and T. Iwata (2002). Rupture process of the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake estimated from strong-motion waveforms, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 300-311.
49. Somerville, P. G. (2003). Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 137, 201-212.
50. Somerville, P., K. Irikura, R. Graves, S. Sawada, D. Wald, N. Abrahamson, Y. Iwasaki, T. Kagawa, N. Smith, and A. Kowada (1999). Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion, Seism. Res. Lett. 70, 59-80.
51. Tinti, E., P. Spudich, and M. Cocco (2005). Earthquake fracture energy inferred from kinematic rupture models on extended faults, J. Geophys. Res. 110, B12303, doi 10.1029/2005JB003644.
52. Vermilye, J. M., and C. H. Scholz (1998). The process zone: a microstructural view of fault growth, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 12,223-12,237.
53. Wald, D. J., and T. H. Heaton (1994). Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 668-691.
54. Wells, D. L., and K. L. Coppersmith (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 974-1002.
55. Yamashita, T. (2000). Generation of microcracks by dynamic shear rupture and its effects on rupture growth and elastic wave radiation, Geophys. J. Int. 143, 395406.
56. Zhang, W. B., T. Iwata, K. Irikura, H. Sekiguchi, and M. Bouchon (2003). Heterogeneous distribution of the dynamic source parameters of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2232, doi 10.1029/2002JB001889.