Variability of near-field ground motion from dynamic earthquake rupture simulations

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1207-1228

  Ripperger, S ^a   Mai, P M ^a   Ampuero, J P ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; EARTHQUAKES; EPITAXIAL GROWTH; GREEN'S FUNCTION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; RADAR STATIONS; RUPTURE DISKS; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOLOGY;

(ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC) STRESS; (MIN ,MAX ,+) FUNCTIONS; ATTENUATION RELATION; CALIFORNIA; DATA SETS; DIRECTIVITY; DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODELS; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURES; GENERAL (CO); GEOMETRIC MEAN (MG); GROUND MOTION VARIABILITY; GROUND MOTIONS; GROUND VELOCITY; HYPOCENTER LOCATIONS; MODELING APPROACHES; NEAR FIELDS; ORDER-OF MAGNITUDES; ORTHOGONAL COMPONENTS; PARKFIELD; PEAK GROUND VELOCITY (PGV); RADIATION PATTERNS; RUPTURE PARAMETERS; RUPTURE PROCESSES; SENSOR ORIENTATION; SLIP VELOCITY; SPATIAL CORRELATION (SC); SPATIAL HETEROGENEITIES; SPECTRAL ACCELERATION (SA); SYSTEMATIC (CO); TECTONIC STRESSES;

DYNAMIC MODELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EARTHQUAKE HYPOCENTER; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; GREEN FUNCTION; GROUND MOTION; PARKFIELD EARTHQUAKE 2004; SEISMOGRAM; SHEAR STRESS;

EID: 46149115648     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120070076     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aagaard, B. T., J. F. Hall, and T. H. Heaton (2001). Characterization of near-source ground motions with earthquake simulations, Earthq. Spectra 17, no. 2, 177-207.
2. Aagaard, B. T., J. F. Hall, and T. H. Heaton (2004). Effects of fault dip and slip rake angles on near-source ground motions: why rupture directivity was minimal in the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, no. 1, 155-170.
3. Abercrombie, R. E., and J. R. Rice (2005). Can observations of earthquake scaling eonstrain stip-weakening?, Geophys. J. Int. 162, 406-424, doi 10.1111/j.1365246X.2005.02579.x.
4. Abrahamson, N. A., and W. J. Silva (1997). Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, no. 1, 94-68.
5. Aki, K. (1968). Seismic displacements near a fault, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 5359-5376.
6. Aki, K., and P. G. Richards (2002). Quantitative Seismology, Second Ed., University Science Books, Sausalito, California.
7. Ambraseys, N. N., J. Douglas, S. K. Sarma, and P. M. Smit (2005). Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 3, 1-53, doi 10.1007/s10518-005-0183-0.
8. Ampuero, J.-P., J. Ripperger, and P. M. Mai (2006). Properties of dynamic earthquake ruptures with heterogeneous stress drop, in Earthquakes: Radiated Energy and the Physics of Faulting, R. Abercrombie, A. McGarr and H. Kanamori (Editors), American Geophysical Monograph 170, 255-261.
9. Andrews, D. J. (1980). A stochastic fault model 1. Static case, J. Geophys. Res. 85, no. B7, 3867-3877.
10. Aochi, H., and J. Douglas (2006). Testing the validity of simulated strong ground motion from the dynamic rupture of a finite fault, by using empirical equations, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 4, 211-229, doi 10.1007/s10518-006-0001-3.
11. Archuleta, R. J., and G. A. Frazier (1978). Three-dimensional numerical simulations of dynamic faulting in a half-space, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 68, no. 3, 541--68.
12. Beyer, K., and J. J. Bommer (2006). Relationships between median values and between aleatory variabilities for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4A, 1512-1522, doi 10.1785/0120050210.
13. Boatwright, J., K. Thywissen, and L. C. Seekins (2001). Correlation of ground motion and intensity for the 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake, Bull Seismol. Soc. Am. 91, no. 4, 739-752.
14. Boore, D. M., W. B. Gibbs, W. B. Joyner, J. C. Tinsley, and D. J. Ponti (2003). Estimated ground motion from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake at the site of the Interstate 10 and La Cienega Boulevard bridge collapse, West Los Angeles, California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, no. 6, 2737-2751.
15. Boore, D. M., J. Watson-Lamprey, and N. A. Abrahamson (2006). Orientation independent measures of ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4A, 1502-1511, doi 10.1785/0120050209.
16. Campbell, K. W. (1997). Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo absolute acceleration response spectra, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, no. 1, 154-179.
17. Campbell, K. W. (2000). Erratum: "Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra", Seism. Res. Lett. 71, no. 3, 352-354.
18. Campbell, K. W. (2001). Erratum: "Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra", Seism. Res. Lett. 72, no. 4, 474.
19. Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia (2003). Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, no. 1,314-331.
20. Chopra, A. K. (2001). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, International Series in Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Second Ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
21. Das, S., and K. Aki (1977). A numerical study of two-dimensional spontaneous rupture propagation, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 50, 643-668.
22. Dunham, E. M. (2005). Dissipative interface waves and the transient response of a three dimensional sliding interface with Coulomb friction, J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 53, 327-357, doi 10.1016/ j.jmps.2004.07.003.
23. Fletcher, J. B., L. M. Baker, P. Spudich, P. Goldstein, J. D. Sims, and M. Hellweg (1992). The USGS Parkfield, California, dense seismograph array: UPSAR, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82, no. 2, 1041-1070.
24. Fletcher, J. B., P. Spudich, and L. M. Baker (2006). Rupture propagation of the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake from observations at the UPSAR, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S129-S142, doi 10.1785/0120050812.
25. Futterman, W. I. (1962). Dispersive body waves, J. Geophys. Res. 67, no. 13, 5279-5291.
26. Geubelle, P. H., and J. R. Rice (1995). A spectral method for three-dimensional elastodynamic fracture problems, J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 43, no. 11, 1791-1824.
27. Graves, R. W. (1998). Three-dimensional Finite-Difference modeling of the San Andreas fault: source parameterization and ground-motion levels, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, no. 4, 881-897.
28. Graves, R., and A. Pitarka (2004). Broadband time history simulation using a hybrid approach, in Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, paper no. 1098.
29. Guatteri, M., P. M. Mai, and G. C. Beroza (2004). A pseudo-dynamic approximation to dynamic rupture models for strong ground motion prediction, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, no. 6, 2051-2063.
30. Haskell, N. (1969). Elastic displacements in the near-field of a propagating fault, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 59, no. 2, 865-908.
31. Inoue, T., and T. Miyatake (1998). 3D simulation of near-field strong ground motion based on dynamic modeling, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, no. 6, 1445-1456.
32. Kanamori, H., and E. Brodsky (2004). The physics of earthquakes, Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 1429-1496, doi 10.1088/0034-4885/67/8/R03.
33. Mai, P. M. (2004). SRCMOD: a database of finite-source rupture models, www.seismo.ethz.ch/srcmod (last accessed December 2006).
34. Mai, P. M., and G. C. Beroza (2000). Source scaling properties from finite-fault-rupture models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, no. 3, 604-615.
35. Mai, P. M., and G. C. Beroza (2002). A spatial random field model to characterize complexity in earthquake slip, J. Geophys. Res. 107, no. B11, 2308, doi 10.1029/2001JB000588.
36. Mai, P. M., P. Somerville, A. Pitarka, L. Dalguer, H. Miyake, G. Beroza, S.-G. Song, and K. Irikura (2006). Fracture-energy scaling in dynamic rupture models of past earthquakes, in Earthquakes: Radiated Energy and the Physics of Faulting, R. Abercrombie, A. McGarr and H. Kanamori (Editors), American Geophysical Monograph, 170, 283-293.
37. Mai, P. M., P. Spudich, and J. Boatwright (2005). Hypocenter locations in finite-source rupture models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95, no. 3, 965-980, doi 10.1785/0120040111.
38. Nielsen, S. B., and K. B. Olsen (2000). Constraints on stress and friction from dynamic rupture models of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake, Pure Appl. Geophys. 157, 2029-2046.
39. Oglesby, D. D., and S. M. Day (2002). Stochastic fault stress: implications for fault dynamics and ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, no. 8, 3006-3021.
40. Oglesby, D. D., R. J. Archuleta, and S. B. Nielsen (2000). The three-dimensional dynamics of dipping faults, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, no. 3, 616-628.
41. Olsen, K. B., S. M. Day, J. B. Minster, Y. Cui, A. Chourasia, M. Faerman, R. Moore, P. Maechling, and T. Jordan (2006). Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L07305, doi 10.1029/2005GL025472.
42. Olsen, K. B., R. Madariaga, and R. J. Archuleta (1997). Three-dimensional dynamic simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake, Science 278, 834-838.
43. Olson, A. H., J. A. Orcutt, and G. A. Frazier (1984). The discrete wavenumber/finite element method for synthetic seismograms, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 77, 421-460.
44. Peyrat, S., and K. B. Olsen (2004). Nonlinear dynamic rupture inversion of the 2000 Western Tottori, Japan, earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L05604, doi 10.1029/2003GL019058.
45. Ripperger, J., and P. M. Mai (2004). Fast computation of static stress changes on 2D faults from final slip distributions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L18610, doi 10.1029/2004GL020594.
46. Ripperger, J., J.-P. Ampuero, P. M. Mai, and D. Giardini (2007). Earthquake source characteristics from dynamic rupture with constrained stochastic fault stress, J. Geophys. Res 112, B04311, doi 10.1029/2006JB004515.
47. Shakal, A., H. Haddadi, V. Graizer, K. Lin, and M. Huang (2006). Some key features of the strong-motion data from the M 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake of 28 September 2004, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4b, S90-Sl18, doi 10.1785/0120050817.
48. Somerville, P. G., N. F. Smith, R. W. Graves, and N. A. Abrahamson (1997). Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, no. 1, 199-222.
49. Spudich, P., and L. Xu (2003). Software package COMPSYN: programs for earthquake ground motion calculation using complete 1-D Green's functions, in International Handbook of Earthquake & Engineering Seismology, in International Geophysics Series, W. H. K. Lee, H. Kanamori, P. Jennings and C. Kisslinger (Editors), Vol. 81, Academic Press, Amsterdam.
50. Wald, D. J., V. Quitoriano, T. H. Heaton, and H. Kanamori (1999). Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and modified Mercalli intensity in California, Earthq. Spectra 15, no. 3, 557-564.
51. Wells, D. L., and K. J. Coppersmith (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, no. 4, 974-1002.