Prospectives for applying molecular and genetic methodology to improve wheat cultivars in drought environments

Comptes Rendus - Biologies

Volumn 331, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 579-586

  Zhao, Chang Xing ^a,b   Guo, Ling Yu ^a   Jaleel, Cheruth Abdul ^c   Shao, Hong Bo ^d,e,f   Yang, Hong Bing ^a  

^a QINGDAO AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^c ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY   (India)

^d BINZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e INSTITUTE OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION   (China)

^f QINGDAO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Comparative mapping; Drought environments; Genetic linkage maps; Genomics assisted breeding; Segregating population; Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; BREEDING; CULTIVAR; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; WHEAT;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; BULKED SEGREGANT ANALYSIS; CULTIVAR; DNA SEQUENCE; DROUGHT STRESS; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOTYPE; NONHUMAN; PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT YIELD; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; TRANSGENIC CROP; WHEAT;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENOMICS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NATURAL DISASTERS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; TRITICUM;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 46149107259     PISSN: 16310691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. R.M. Trethowan, W.H. Pfeiffer, Challenges and future strategies in breeding wheat for adaptation to drought stressed environments: A CIMMYT wheat program perspective, in: J.-M. Ribaut, D. Poland (Eds.), Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments, A strategic planning workshop held at CIMMYT El Batan, Mexico, 21-25 June 1999, CIMMYT, Mexico DF, 2000, pp. 45-48
2. World Meteorological Organisation, Comprehensive Assessment of the Freshwater, Resources of the World, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997
3. Chaves M.M., and Oliveira M.M. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: Prospects for water-saving agriculture. J. Exp. Bot. 55 (2004) 2365-2384
4. Vazifedoust M., van Dam J.-C., Feddes R.A., and Feizi M. Increasing water productivity of irrigated crops under limited water supply at field scale. Agric. Water Manage. 95 (2008) 89-102
5. Foulkes M.J., Sylvester-Bradley R., Weightman R., and Snape J.W. Identifying physiological traits associated with improved drought resistance in winter wheat. Field Crops Res. 103 (2007) 11-24
6. van Ginkel M., and Ogbonnaya F. Novel genetic diversity from synthetic wheats in breeding cultivars for changing production conditions. Field Crops Res. 104 (2007) 86-94
7. Sahrawat A.K., Becker D., Lütticke S., and Lörz H. Genetic improvement of wheat via alien gene transfer, an assessment. Plant Sci. 165 (2003) 1147-1168
8. Izawa T., Takahashi Y., and Yano M. Comparative biology comes into bloom: Genomic and genetic comparison of flowering pathways in rice and Arabidopsis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6 (2003) 113-120
9. Dilbirligi M., Erayman M., Campbell B.T., Randhawa H.S., Baenziger P.S., Dweikat I., and Gill K.S. High-density mapping and comparative analysis of agronomically important traits on wheat chromosome 3A. Genomics 88 (2006) 74-87
10. Varshney R.K., Sigmund R., Börner A., Korzun V., Stein N., Sorrells M.E., Langridge P., and Graner A. Interspecific transferability and comparative mapping of barley EST-SSR markers in wheat, rye and rice. Plant Sci. 168 (2005) 195-202
11. Paterson A.H., Lin Y.R., Li S., Schertz K.F., Doebley J.F., Pinson S.R.M., Liu S.C., Stansel J.W., and Irvine J.E. Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 269 (1995) 1714-1717
12. Hay R.K.M., and Ellis R.P. The control of flowering in wheat and barley: what recent advances in molecular genetics can reveal. Ann. Bot. 82 (1998) 541-554
13. Tuberosa R., and Salvi S. Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends Plant Sci. 11 (2006) 405-412
14. Ahn S., Anderson J.E., Sorrells M.E., and Tanksley S.D. Homoeologous relationships of rice, wheat and maize chromosomes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 241 (1993) 483-490
15. Ahn S., and Tanksley S.D. Comparative linkage maps of the rice and maize genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993) 7980-7984
16. Gale M.D., and Devos K.M. Comparative genetics in the grasses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998) 1971-1974
17. Hulbert S.H., Richter T.E., Axtell J.D., and Bennetzen J.L. Genetic mapping and characterization of sorghum and related crops by means of maize DNA probes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87 (1990) 4251-4255
18. Moore G., Devos K.M., Wang Z., and Gale M.D. Cereal genome evolution - grasses, line up and form a circle. Curr. Biol. 5 (1995) 737-739
19. McCouch S. Toward a plant genomics initiative: Thoughts on the value of cross-species, and cross-genera comparisons in the grasses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998) 1983-1985
20. Cattivelli L., Rizza F., Badeck F.W., Mazzucotelli E., Mastrangelo A.M., Francia E., Marè C., Tondelli A., and Stanca A.M. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res. 105 (2008) 1-14
21. Quarrie S., Lazic-Jancic V., Kovacevic D., Steed A., and Pekic S. Bulk segregant analysis with molecular markers and its use for improving drought resistance in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 50 (1999) 1299-1306
22. Brauer M.J., Christianson C.M., Pai D.A., and Dunham M.J. Mapping novel traits by array-assisted bulk segregant analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 173 (2006) 1813-1816
23. 2 and backcross generations for bulked segregant analysis using dominant markers. Crop Sci. 40 (2000) 626-630
24. Michelmore R.W., Paran I., and Kesseli R.V. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) 9828-9832
25. Kölliker R., Jones E.S., Jahufer M.Z.Z., and Forster J.W. Bulked AFLP analysis for the assessment of genetic diversity in white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Euphytica 121 (2001) 305-315
26. Tuberosa R., Salvi S., Sanguineti M.C., Landi P., Maccaferri M., and Conti S. Mapping QTLs regulating morpho-physiological traits and yield: Case studies, shortcomings and perspectives in drought-stressed maize. Ann. Bot. 89 (2002) 941-963
27. Ahu A., and Nermin G. Search for microsatellite markers associated with water-stress tolerance in wheat through bulked segregant analysis. Mol. Biotech. 23 (2003) 97-106
28. Devos K.M., Dubcovsky J., Dvorák J., Chinoy C.N., and Gale M.D. Structural evolution of wheat chromosomes 4A, 5A and 7B and its impact on recombination. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91 (1995) 282-288
29. Nelson J.C., Sorrells M.E., Van Deynze A.E., Lu Y.H., Atkinson M., Bernard M., Leroy P., Faris J.D., and Anderson J.A. Molecular mapping of wheat: Major genes and rearrangements in homoeologous groups 4, 5 and 7. Genetics 141 (1995) 721-731
30. Dubcovsky J., Luo M.C., Zhong G.Y., Bransteitter R., Desai A., Kilian A., Kleinhofs A., and Dvorak J. Genetic map of diploid wheat, Triticum monococcum L., and its comparison with maps of Hordeum vulgare L. Genetics 143 (1996) 983-999
31. Chao S., Zhang W.J., Dubcovsky J., and Sorrells M. Evaluation of genetic diversity and genome-wide linkage disequilibrium among U.S. wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm representing different market classes. Crop Sci. 47 (2007) 1018-1030
32. Joshi C.P., and Nguyen H.T. RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) analysis based intervarietal genetic relationships among hexaploid wheats. Plant Sci. 93 (1993) 95-103
33. Tanskley S.D., Young N.D., Paterson A.H., and Bonierbale M.W. RFLP mapping in plant breeding: New tools for an old science. Bio/Technology 7 (1989) 257-264
34. Lee M. DNA markers and plant breeding programs. Adv. Agron. 55 (1995) 265-344
35. M. Sorrells, The application of comparative genetics to wheat improvement, in: M.M. Kohli, M. Francis (Eds.), Application of Biotechnologies to wheat breeding, Proceedings of a Conference at La Estanzuela, Uruguay, 19-20 November 1998, Montevideo, Uruguay, pp. 17-32
36. Caetano-Anollés G., Bassam B.J., and Gresshoff P.M. DNA amplification fingerprinting: A strategy for genome analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9 (1991) 294-307
37. Dreisigacker S., Zhang P., Warburton M.L., Skovmand B., Hoisington D., and Melchinger A.E. Genetic diversity among and within CIMMYT wheat landrace accessions investigated with SSRs and implications for plant genetic resources management. Crop Sci. 45 (2005) 653-661
38. S. Eathington, Practical uses of molecular markers in a commercial breeding program (Monsanto), in: S. Higman (Ed.), Proc. International Plant Breeding Symposium - Honouring John Dudley, 20-25 August 2006
39. D'Ovidio R., and Anderson O.D. PCR analysis to distinguish between alleles of a member of a multigene family correlated with wheat bread-making quality. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88 (1994) 759-763
40. Ribaut J.M., Hu X., Hoisington D., and González-de-León D. Use of STSs and SSRs as rapid and reliable preselection tools in a marker-assisted selection scheme. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 15 (1997) 154-162
41. Grausgruber H., Oberforster M., Ghambashidze G., and Ruckenbauer P. Yield and agronomic traits of Khorasan wheat (Triticum turanicum Jakubz.). Field Crops Res. 91 (2005) 319-327
42. Rooney W.L. Sorghum improvement-integrating traditional and new technology to produce improved genotypes. Adv. Agron. 83 (2004) 37-109
43. Hash C.T., Bhasker Raj A.G., Lindup S., Sharma A., Beniwal C.R., Folkertsma R.T., Mahalakshmi V., Zerbini E., and Blümmel M. Opportunities for marker-assisted selection (MAS) to improve the feed quality of crop residues in pearl millet and sorghum. Field Crops Res. 84 (2003) 79-88
44. Kiani S.P., Talia P., Maury P., Grieu P., Heinz R., Perrault A., Nishinakamasu V., Hopp E., Gentzbittel L., Paniego N., and Sarrafi A. Genetic analysis of plant water status and osmotic adjustment in recombinant inbred lines of sunflower under two water treatments. Plant Sci. 72 (2007) 773-787
45. Bennett M.D. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B 181 (1972) 109-135
46. Smith D.B., and Flavell R.B. Characterisation of the wheat genome by renaturation kinetics. Chromosoma 50 (1975) 223-242
47. Devos K.M., Chao S., Li Q.Y., Simonetti M.C., and Gale M.D. Relationship between chromosome 9 of maize and wheat homeologous group 7 chromosomes. Genetics 138 (1994) 1287-1292
48. Taylor C., Sheperd K.W., and Langridge P. A molecular genetic map of the long arm of chromosome 6R or rye incorporating the cereal cyst nematode resistance gene, Cre R. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97 (1998) 1000-1012
49. Somers D.J., Fedak G., and Savard M. Molecular mapping of novel genes controlling Fusarium head blight resistance and deoxynivalenol accumulation in spring wheat. Genome 46 (2003) 555-564
50. Roder M.S., Korzun V., Wendehake K., Plaschke J., and Tixier M. A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149 (1998) 2007-2023
51. Akhunov E.D., Goodyear A.W., Geng S., Qi L.L., and Echalier B. The organization and rate of evolution of wheat genomes are correlated with recombination rates along chromosome arms. Genome Res. 13 (2003) 753-763
52. Rota M.L., and Sorrells M.E. Comparative DNA sequence analysis of mapped wheat ESTs reveals the complexity of genome relationships between rice and wheat. Funct. Integr. Genom. 4 (2004) 34-46
53. S. Stack, L. Campbell, K. Henderson, I. Eujayl, M. Hannafey, W. Powell, P. Wolters, Development of EST-derived microsatellite markers for mapping and germplasm analysis in wheat, in: Proceedings & Abstracts. Plant & Animal Genome VIII. The International Conference on the Status of Plant & Animal Genome Research, San Diego, USA, 9-12 January 2000, p. 227
54. Way H., Chapman S., McIntyre L., Casu R., Xue G.P., Manners J., and Shorter R. Identification of differentially expressed genes in wheat undergoing gradual water deficit stress using a subtractive hybridization approach. Plant Sci. 168 (2005) 661-670
55. Zhang R.Y., Xu Z.S., Li L.C., Chen M., and Z Ma Y. Isolation and expression analysis of a novel abiotic stress-induced gene W89 from wheat. Agric. Sci. China 6 (2007) 391-398
56. Adams M.D., Kelley J.M., Gocayne J.D., Polymeropoulos M.H., Xiao H., Merril C.R., Wu A., Olde B., Moreno R.F., Kerlavage A.R., McCombie W.R., and Venter J.C. Complementary DNA sequencing: Expressed sequence tags and human genome project. Science 252 (1991) 1651-1656
57. Newman T., de Bruijn F.J., Green P., Keegstra K., Kende H., McIntosh L., Ohlrogge J., Raikhel N., Somerville S., Thomashow M., Retzel E., and Somerville C. Genes galore: A summary of methods for accessing results from large-scale partial sequencing of anonymous Arabidopsis cDNA clones. Plant Physiol. 106 (1994) 1241-1255
58. Rounsley S.D., Glodek A., Sutton G., Adams M.D., Somerville C.R., Venter J.C., and Kerlavage A.R. The construction of Arabidopsis expressed sequence tag assemblies (a new resource to facilitate gene identification). Plant Physiol. 112 (1996) 1177-1183
59. Zouari N., Saad R.B., Legavre T., Azaza J., Sabau X., Jaoua M., Masmoudi K., and Hassairi A. Identification and sequencing of ESTs from the halophyte grass Aeluropus littoralis. Gene 404 (2007) 61-69
60. Bevan M., Bancroft I., Mewes H.W., Martienssen R., and McCombie R. Clearing a path through the jungle: Progress in Arabidopsis genomics. Bioessays 21 (1999) 110-120
61. Goff S.A. Rice as a model for cereal genomics. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2 (1999) 86-89
62. Ning J., Yuan B., Xie K.B., Hu H.H., Wu C.Q., and Xiong L.Z. Isolation and identification of SA and JA inducible protein kinase gene OsSJMK1 in rice. Acta Genet. Sin. 33 (2006) 625-633
63. Walbot V. Genes, Genomes, Genomics. What can plant biologists expect from the 1998 National Science Foundation Plant Genome Research Program?. Plant Physiol. 119 (1999) 1151-1155
64. Coramand T.E., and Pang E.C.K. Isolation and analysis of candidate ascochyta blight defence genes in chickpea. Part I. Generation and analysis of an expressed sequence tag (EST) library. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 66 (2005) 192-200
65. Wang Y.C., Yang C.P., Liu G.F., and Jiang J. Development of a cDNA microarray to identify gene expression of Puccinellia tenuiflora under saline-alkali stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 45 (2007) 567-576
66. Varshney R.K., Langridge P., and Graner A. Application of genomics to molecular breeding of wheat and barley. Adv. Genet. 58 (2007) 121-155
67. Schafleitner R., Rosales R.O.G., Gaudin A., Aliaga C.A.A., Martinez G.N., Marca L.R.T., Bolivar L.A., Delgado F.M., Simon R., and Bonierbale M. Capturing candidate drought tolerance traits in two native Andean potato clones by transcription profiling of field grown plants under water stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 45 (2007) 673-690
68. Gutterson N., and Zhang J.Z. Genomics applications to biotech traits: A revolution in progress?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7 (2004) 226-230
69. Burke J.M., Burger J.C., and Chapman M.A. Crop evolution: From genetics to genomics. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17 (2007) 525-532
70. Valliyodan B., and Nguyen H.T. Understanding regulatory networks and engineering for enhanced drought tolerance in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9 (2006) 189-195
71. Campos H., Cooper M., Habben J.E., Edmeades G.O., and Schussler J.R. Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops Res. 90 (2004) 19-34
72. Kathiresan A., Lafitte H.R., Chen J.X., Mansueto L., Bruskiewich R., and Bennett J. Gene expression microarrays and their application in drought stress research. Field Crops Res. 97 (2006) 101-110
73. Morgante M., and Salamini F. From plant genomics to breeding practice. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14 (2003) 214-219
74. Lemieux B., Aharoni A., and Schena M. Overview of DNA chip technology. Mol. Breed 4 (1998) 277-289
75. Hieter P., and Boguski M. Functional Genomics: It's all how you read it. Science 278 (1997) 601-604
76. Salekdeh G.H., Siopongco J., Wade L.J., Ghareyazie B., and Bennett J. A proteomic approach to analyzing drought- and salt-responsiveness in rice. Field Crops Res. 76 (2002) 199-219
77. Schena M., Shalon D., Davis R.W., and Brown P.O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270 (1995) 467-470
78. Ruan Y., Gilmore J., and Conner T. Towards Arabidopsis genome analysis: monitoring expression profiles of 1400 genes using cDNA microarrays. Plant J. 15 (1998) 821-833
79. Kehoe D.M., Villand P., and Sommerville S. Microarrays for studies of higher plants and other photosynthetic organisms. Trends Plant Sci. 4 (1999) 38-41
80. Leung H. Stressed genomics - bringing relief to rice fields. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11 (2008) 201-208
81. Sreenivasulu N., Sopory S.K., and Kishor P.B.K. Deciphering the regulatory mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by genomic approaches. Gene 388 (2007) 1-13
82. Abebe T., Guenzi A.C., Martin B., and Chushman J.C. Tolerance of mannitol-accumulating transgenic wheat to water stress and salinity. Plant Physiol. 131 (2003) 1748-1755
83. Pellegrineschi A., Reynolds M., Pacheco M., Brito R.M., Almeraya R., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., and Hoisington D. Stress-induced expression in wheat of the Arabidopsis thaliana DREB1A gene delays water stress symptoms under greenhouse conditions. Genome 47 (2004) 493-500
84. Sivamani E., Bahieldin A., Wraith J.M., Al-Niemi T., Dyer W.E., Ho T.H.D., and Qu R. Improved biomass productivity and water use efficiency under water deficit conditions in transgenic wheat constitutively expressing the barley HVA1 gene. Plant Sci. 155 (2000) 1-9
85. Jang C.S., Lee H.J., Chang S.J., and Seo Y.W. Expression and promoter analysis of the TaLTP1 gene induced by drought and salt stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 167 (2004) 995-1001
86. Singh G., Jain M., Kulshreshtha R., Khurana J.P., Kumar S., and Singh P. Expression analysis of genes encoding translation initiation factor 3 subunit g (TaeIF3g) and vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein (TaVAP) in drought tolerant and susceptible cultivars of wheat. Plant Sci. 173 (2007) 660-669