Reliability and validity of the Edinburgh Visual Gait Score for cerebral palsy when used by inexperienced observers

Gait and Posture

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 323-326

  Ong, A M L ^a   Hillman, S J ^b   Robb, J E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cerebral palsy; Gait; Visual assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GAIT; HUMAN; MEDICAL STUDENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION STUDY; VIDEOTAPE;

CEREBRAL PALSY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; GAIT; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 46049116471     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Read H.S., Hazlewood M.E., Hillman S.J., Prescott R.J., and Robb J.E. Edinburgh visual gait score for use in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 23 (2003) 296-301
2. Hillman S.J., Hazlewood M.E., Schwartz M.H., van der Linden M.L., and Robb J.E. Correlation of the Edinburgh gait score with the Gillette gait index, the gillette functional assessment questionnaire, and dimensionless speed. J Pediatr Orthop 27 (2007) 7-11
3. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i (1986) 307-310
4. Landis J.R., and Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159-174