Evaluation of an efficient method for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 249-254

  Roscoe, Eileen M ^a   Fisher, Wayne W ^a,b  

^a Marcus Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback; Staff training; Stimulus preference assessment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; EDUCATION; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REINFORCEMENT; ROLE PLAYING;

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MENTAL RETARDATION; MOTIVATION; ROLE PLAYING; TOKEN ECONOMY;

EID: 46049114063     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-249     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-532.
2. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498.
3. Lavie, T., & Sturmey, P. (2002). Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 209-211.
4. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255.
5. Roscoe, E. M., Fisher, W. W., Glover, A. C., & Volkert, V. M. (2006). Evaluating the relative effects of feedback and contingent money for staff training of stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 63-77.