Coercion and human rights: A European perspective

Journal of Mental Health

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 245-254

  Richardson, Genevra ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Legal analysis; Social and political issues

Indexed keywords

DETENTION; GROUP THERAPY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMED CONSENT; INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL EXPERT; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MENTAL HOSPITAL; MENTAL PATIENT; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT RIGHT; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 46049110523     PISSN: 09638237     EISSN: 13600567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638230802052211     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Bartlett, P., Lewis, O., & Thorold, O. (2006). Mental dsability and the European convention on human rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
2. Bartlett, P., & Sandland, R. (2007). Mental health law: Policy and practice, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University
3. Press.Bayles, M. (1990). Procedural justice: Allocating to individuals. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Bean, P. (1986). Mental disorder and legal control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Dawson, J., & Szmukler, G. (2006). The fusion of mental health and incapacity legislation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 504-509.
6. Department of Constitutional Affairs (2007). Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice. London: TSO.
7. Department of Health (1999). Report of the Expert Committee, Review of the Mental Health Act 1983. London: Department of Health.
8. Department of Health (2007). Draft Addendum to the Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice. London: Department of Health.
9. Eastman, N., & Peay, J. (1999). Law without enforcement. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
10. Galligan, D. (1996). Due process and fair procedures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Hiday, V., Swartz, M., Swanson, J., & Wagner, H. (1997). Patient perception of coercion in mental hospital admission. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20, 227-241.
12. Hoyer, G., Kjellin, L., Engberg, M., Kaltiala-Heino, R., Nilstun, T., Sigurjonsdottir, M., & Syse, A. (2002). Paternalism and autonomy: A presentation of a Nordic study on the use of coercion in the mental health care system. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 93-108.
13. Lind, E., & Tyler, T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
14. Lind, E., Kanfer, R., & Early, P. (1990). Voice, control and procedural justice: Instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
15. McKenna, B., Simpson, A., Coverdale, J., & Laidlaw, T. (2001). An analysis of procedural justice during psychiatric hospital admission. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24, 573-581.
16. McKenna, B., Simpson, A., & Coverdale, J. (2003). Patients' perception of coercion on admission to forensic psychiatric hospital: A comparison study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 355-372.
17. Monahan, J., Hoge, S., Lidz, C., Roth, L., Bennett, N., Gardner, W., & Mulvey, E. (1995). Coercion and commitment: Understanding involuntary hospital admission. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18, 249-263.
18. Poulsen, H. (1999). Perceived coercion among committed, detained and voluntary patients. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 167-175.
19. Poulsen, H. (2002). The prevalence of extralegal deprivation of liberty in a psychiatric hospital population. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 29-36.
20. Richardson, G. (1994). Law, process and custody: Prisoners and patients. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
21. Richardson, G. (2002). Autonomy, guardianship and mental disorder: One problem, two solutions. Modern Law Review, 65, 702-723.
22. Richardson, G. (2005). The European Convention and Mental Health Law in England and Wales: Moving beyond process. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28, 127-139.
23. Richardson, G. (2007). Balancing autonomy and risk: A failure of nerve in England and Wales? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 71-80.
24. Szmukler, G., & Holloway, F. (1998). Mental health law is now a harmful anachronism. Psychiatric Bulletin, 22, 662-665.
25. Zigmond, A., & Holland, A. (2000). Unethical mental health law: History repeats itself. Journal of Mental Health Law, 3, 49-56.