Comparison of QuickBird and SPOT 5 satellite imagery for mapping giant reed

Journal of Aquatic Plant Management

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 77-82

  Everitt, J H ^a   Yang, C ^a   Fletcher, R ^a   Deloach, C J ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy assessment; Arundo donax; False color imagery; QuickBird satellite imagery; SPOT 5 satellite imagery; Supervised image analysis

Indexed keywords

ARUNDO DONAX;

EID: 46049110102     PISSN: 01466623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bell, G. P. 1997. Ecology and management of Arundo donax and approaches to riparian habitat restoration in California, pp. 103-113. In: J. H. Brock, M. Wade, P. Pysek and D. Green (eds.), Plant Invasion Studies from North America and Europe. Blackhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
2. Congalton, R. G. and K. Green. 1999. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Lewis Publishers, New York, NY. 137 pp.
3. Dipietro, D., S. L. Ustin and E. Underwood. 2002. Mapping the invasive plant Arundo donax and associated vegetation using AVIRIS. In: Proceedings 11th JPL Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Workshop. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. CD-ROM.
4. Dudley, T. L. and B. Collins. 1995. Biological invasions in California wild-lands: the impacts and control of non-indigenous species in natural areas. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, Oakland, CA. 62 pp.
5. Dudley, T. L. 2000. Arundo donax, pp. 53-58. In: C. C. Bossard, J. M. Randal and H. S. Hosovsky (eds.), Invasive Plants of California Wildlands. University of California Press, Berkeley.
6. Erdas, Inc. 2002. Erdas-Imagine v8.6 tour guide. Erdas, Inc. Atlanta, GA.
7. Everitt, J. H., C. Yang, M. A. Alaniz, M. R. Davis, F. L. Nibling and C. J. Deloach. 2004. Canopy spectra and remote sensing of giant reed and associated vegetation J. Range Manage. 57:561-569.
8. Everitt, J. H., C. Yang, and C. J. Deloach. 2005. Remote sensing of giant reed with QuickBird satellite imagery. J. Aquatic Plant Manage. 43:81-85.
9. Frandsen, P. and N.E. Jackson. 1994. The impact of Arundo donax on flood plain control and endangered species, pp. 13-16. In: N. E. Jackson, P. Frandsen and S. Duthoit (eds.), Arundo donax Workshop Proceedings. California Exotic Pest Plant Council, Ontario, CA.
10. Hitchcock, A. S. 1971. Manual of the grasses of the United States. Second revised edition, Vol. 1. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY. 1051 pp.
11. Hoshovsky, M. 1987. Element Stewardship Abstract for Arundo donax. The Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, CA. 10 pp.
12. Iverson, M. E. 1994. The impact of Arundo donax on water resources, pp. 19-25. In: N. E.Jackson, P. Frandsen and S. Duthoit (eds.), Arundo donax Workshop Proceedings. California Exotic Pest Plant Council, Ontario, CA.
13. Pasqualini, V., C. Pergent-Martini, G. Pergent, M. Agreil, G. Skoufas, F. Sourbes and A. Tsirika. 2005. Use of SPOT 5 for mapping seagrasses: An application to Posidonia oceanica. Remote Sens. Environ. 94:39-45.
14. Perdue, R. E., Jr. 1958. Arundo donax - A source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ. Bot. 12:368-404.
15. Polunin, O. and A. Huxley. 1987. Flowers of the Mediterranean. Hogarth Press, London. 258 pp.
16. Thomlinson J. R., P. V. Bolstad and W. B. Cohen. 1999. Coordinating methodologies for scaling land-cover classifications from site-specific to global: steps toward validating global map products. Remote Sens. Environ. 70:16-28.
17. Tracy, J. L. and C. J. Deloach. 1998. Suitability of classical biological control of giant reed (Arundo donax) in the United States, pp. 73-109. In: C. E. Bell (ed.). Proceedings of the Arundo and Saltcedar Workshop. University of California Cooperative Extension Service, Holtville.
18. Underwood, E., S. L. Ustin and D. Dipietro. 2003. Mapping nonnative plants using hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 85:150-161.
19. Weber, K. T., N. F. Glenn, J. T. Mundt and B. Gokhale. 2006. A comparison between multi-spectral and hyperspectral platforms for early detection of leafy spurge in southeastern Idaho, pp. 186-196. In: K. T. Weber (ed.). Final Report: Detection, Prediction, Impact, and Management of Invasive Plants Using GIS. NASA, Greenbelt, MD.