Policy drivers and barriers for coal-to-liquids (CtL) technologies in the United States

Energy Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 3188-3201

  Vallentin, Daniel ^a  

^a Institute for Ecological Economy Research   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coal to liquids; Policy; United States

Indexed keywords

EID: 46049106119     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.032     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andrews Anthony, 2007. Liquid fuels from coal, natural gas, and biomass: background and policy. CRS Report for Congress, Washington, DC.
2. 2 storage capacity estimation (Phase 1) "A taskforce for review and development standards with regard to storage capacity measurement", Presented at the Technical Working Group Meeting of the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum on April 30, Oviedo.
3. John Byrne, Kristen Hughes, Wilson Rickerson, and Lado Kurdgelashvili American policy conflict in the greenhouse: divergent trends in federal, regional, state, and local green energy and climate change policy Energy Policy 35 2007 4555 4573
4. Cicero, 2007. Hydrogen and Syngas Program Overview, power point presentation.
5. DKRW, 2007. Medicine Bow CtL Project Fact Sheet .
6. DOE, 2005. US Climate Change Technology Programme. Vision and Framework for Strategy and Planning, Washington, DC.
7. DOE, 2007. DOE's Fossil Energy Budget - FY 2008, .
8. DOE, 2008. DOE Announces Restructured FutureGen Approach to Demonstrate Carbon Capture and Storage Technology at Multiple Coal Plans, press release, January 30th.
9. 2 Storage Potential Supply Curve and Its Application in a Global Integrated Assessment Model, Baltimore/Livermore.
10. Ecofys, 2004. Global Carbon Dioxide Storage Potential and Costs, Utrecht.
11. EIA, 2005. International Energy Annual Outlook 2005, Washington, DC.
12. EIA, 2006. Annual Energy Outlook 2006. With Projections to 2030, Washington, DC.
13. EIA, 2007. Annual Energy Outlook 2007. With Projections to 2030, Washington, DC.
14. Environment & Energy Daily, 2008. Lieberman-Warner: The 60-vote climb, last updated January 15.
15. EPA, 2006. Program Update. Introduction of Cleaner-Burning Diesel Fuel Enables Advanced Pollution Control for Cars, Trucks and Buses. Washington, DC.
16. EPA, 2007. US Climate Policy and Actions, December 20, 2007 .
17. Gallagher, K.S., Sagar, A., Segal, D., de Sa, P., John P. Holdren, 2006. DOE Budget Authority for Energy Research, Development, and Demonstration Database. Boston.
18. Miller, Bruce G., 2005. Coal Energy Systems. Burlington/San Diego/London.
19. National Energy Policy Development Group, 2001. National energy policy. reliable, affordable, and environmentally sound energy for America's future. Report of the National Energy Policy Development Group, Washington, DC.
20. NCC, 2006. Coal: America's Energy Future, Volume I, Washington, DC.
21. 2 emissions. USA in second position .
22. NETL, 2007a. Attaining Energy Security in Liquid Fuels Through Diverse US Energy Alternatives. Morgantown.
23. NETL, 2007b. Increasing Security and Reducing Carbon Emissions of the US Transportation Sector: A Transformational Role for Coal with Biomass. Morgantown.
24. Pew Centre on Global Climate Change Analysis of President Bush's Climate Change Plan 2002 〈http://www.pewclimate.org/policy_center/analyses/response_bushpolicy.cfm〉
25. Pew Centre on Global Climate Change Legislation in the 109th Congress Related to Global Climate Change 2007 〈http://www.pewclimate.org/what_s_being_done/in_the_congress/109th.cfm〉
26. Darren Samuelsohn Climate: focus shifts to senate floor as Lieberman-Warner Clears Committee Environment & Energy Daily 2007 December 7
27. Sissine Fred, 2007. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007: a summary of major provisions. CRS Report for Congress, Washington, DC.
28. SSEB Building a Bridge to Energy Independence and to a Sustainable Energy Future 2006 American Energy Security Norcross
29. 2 Enhanced Recovery and Storage. Volume I - Preparation Strategy, Plan, and Recommendations 2007
30. 2 Enhanced Recovery and Storage. Volume II - Resource-Specific and Cross-cut Plans 2007
31. US Senate, 2007a. Vote Summary on the Bunning Amendment No. 1628
32. US Senate, 2007b. Vote Summary on the Tester Amendment No. 1614
33. H.K. Vietor Richard Business, government, and markets: synthetic fuels policy in America E.J. Yanarella W.C. Green The Unfulfilled Promise of Synthetic Fuels 1987 Technological Failure, Policy Immobilism, or Commercial Illusion New York/Westport/London
34. White House, 2001. Text of a Letter from the President to Senators Hagel, Helms Craig, and Roberts .
35. White House, 2006. State of the Union Address by the President, January 31, Washington, DC .
36. White House National Economic Council, 2006. Advanced Energy Initiative. Washington, DC.
37. White House Office of Communications, 2007. The 2007 State of the Union Address. Washington, DC.
38. R.H. Williams, and E.D. Larson A comparison of direct and indirect liquefaction technologies for making fluid fuels from coal Energy for Sustainable Development VII 4 2003 103 129
39. 2-Enhanced Oil Recovery. Princeton, NJ.
40. WMPI Reduced Exhaus Emissions with Fischer Tropsch Clean Fuel Relative to Low-Sulfur Diesel Fuel 2007 〈http://www.ultracleanfuels.com〉
41. Wuppertal Institute;Research Centre Jülich, 2006. Strategische Bewertung der Perspektiven synthetischer Kraftstoffe auf Basis fester Biomasse in NRW, Wuppertal/Jülich.