Comparing flexibility mechanisms for fuel economy standards

Energy Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 3106-3114

  Fischer, Carolyn ^a  

^a RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy security; Feebates; Fuel economy

Indexed keywords

EID: 46049105716     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.042     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. David. Austin, and Terry. Dinan Clearing the air: the costs and consequences of higher CAFE standards and increased gasoline taxes Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50 2005 562 582
2. John.M. DeCicco, Howard.S. Geller, and John.H. Morrill Feebates for fuel economy: market incentives for encouraging production and sales of efficient vehicles American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy 1993
3. W.B. Davis, and D. Gordon Using Feebates to Improve Average Fuel Efficiency of the US Vehicle Fleet, LBL-31910 1992 Energy Analysis Program, Energy and Environment Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley, CA January
4. W.B. Davis, M.D. Levine, K. Train, and K.G. Duleep Effects of Feebates on Vehicle Fuel Economy, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Consumer Surplus, DOE/PO-0031 1995 Office of Policy, US Department of Energy Washington, DC February
5. Carolyn. Fischer, Winston. Harrington, and Ian. Parry Do market failures justify tightening Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards? The Energy Journal 28 4 2007 1 30
6. Fischer, Carolyn., 2001. Rebating environmental policy revenues: output-based allocations and tradable performance standards. RFF Discussion Paper 01-22. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
7. Fischer, Carolyn., 2003. Market power and output-based refunding of environmental policy revenues. RFF Discussion Paper 03-27. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
8. Carolyn. Fischer, and Paul. Portney Tradable CAFE credits Richard.D. Morgenstern Paul.R. Portney New Approaches on Energy and the Environment: Policy Advice for the President 2004 RFF Press Washington, DC
9. Ted. Gayer The fatality risks of sport-utility vehicles, vans, and pickups relative to cars Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28 2 2004 103 133
10. D.L. Greene Short-run pricing strategies to increase corporate average fuel economy Economic Inquiry XXIX 1 1991 101 114
11. David.L. Greene, Philip.D. Patterson, Margaret. Singh, and Jia. Li Feebates, rebate, and gas-guzzler taxes: a study of incentives for increased fuel economy Energy Policy 33 6 2005 757 775
12. David.L. Greene, Philip.D. Patterson, Margaret. Singh, and Jia. Li Corrigendum to 'Feebates, rebate, and gas-guzzler taxes: a study of incentives for increased fuel economy' Energy Policy 33 2005 1901 1902
13. HLB Decision Economics Inc., 1999. Assessment of a feebate scheme for Canada. Final Report prepared for Natural Resources Canada, Project no. 6591. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa.
14. Kerr, Suzi., Newell, Richard G., 2003. Policy-induced technology adoption: Evidence from the US Lead Phasedown. Journal of Industrial Economics LI, 3.
15. Suzi. Kerr, and David. Maré Transaction Costs and Tradable Permit Markets: The United States Lead Phasedown 1999 Manuscript, Motu Economic Research New Zealand
16. National Research Council (NRC) Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards 2002 National Academy Press Washington, DC
17. William.A. Pizer, and Madelaine. Baker Understanding Proposed CAFE Reforms for Light Trucks, Backgrounder 2005 Resources for the Future Washington, DC
18. SEPA The Swedish Charge on Nitrogen Oxides 2000 Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Stockholm
19. Kenneth. Small, and Kurt. van Dender Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect Energy Journal 28 2007 25 51
20. x abatement Ecological Economics 57 1 2006 93 106
21. Kenneth.E. Train, William.B. Davis, and Mark.D. Levine Fees and rebates on new vehicles: impacts on fuel efficiency, carbon dioxide emissions, and consumer surplus Transportation Research: Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 33 1 1997