Do classroom exemplars promote the application of principles in teacher education? A comparison of videos, animations, and narratives

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 449-465

  Moreno, Roxana ^a   Ortegano Layne, Ludmila ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Animation; Application; Exemplars; Learning; Modeling; Motivation; Video

Indexed keywords

EID: 46049095715     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-006-9027-0     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. Artificial Intelligence Communications, 7, 39-59.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3. Autodesk (2003). 3D Studio Max (version 5) [Computer software]. Educational version. San Rafael, CA: Author.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Barnett, C. (1991). Building a case-based curriculum to enhance the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 263-272.
6. Barnett, C., & Tyson, P. (1999). Case methods and teacher change: Shifting authority to build autonomy. In M. Lundeberg, B. Levin, & H. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how?. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Beck, R. J., King, A., & Marshall, S. K. (2002). Effects of videocase construction on preservice teachers' observations of teaching. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(4), 345-361.
8. Bikle, K., Billings, E., & Hakuta, K. (2003). Trends in two-way immersion research. In Banks, & Banks (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Borich, G. D., & Tombari, M. L. (1997). Educational psychology: A contemporary approach. Harlow, NY: Longman.
10. Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2002). Observational learning and the effects of model-observer similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 405-415.
11. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 24, pp. 61-100). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
12. Clark, R. E. (1999). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 42, 21-29.
13. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-459.
14. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2004). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Ellis, S. (1995). Origins and elements of virtual environments. In W. Barfield, & T. A. Furness III (Eds.), Virtual environments and advanced interface design. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Fetsco, T., & McClure, J. (2005). Educational Psychology: An integrated approach to classroom decisions. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
18. Fitzgerald, G. E., & Semrau, L. P. (1998). The effects of learner differences on usage patterns and learning outcomes with hypermedia case studies. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(4), 309-341.
19. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393-408.
20. Henry, L. A., Castek, J., Roberts, L., Coiro, J., & Leu, D. J. Jr. (2004). Case technologies to enhance literacy learning: A new model for early literacy teacher preparation. Knowledge Quest, 33(2), 26-29.
21. Koehler, M. J. (2002). Designing case-based hypermedia for developing understanding of children's mathematical reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 151-195.
22. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. Morgan Kauffman.
23. Lacey, C. A., & Merseth, K. K. (1993). Cases, hypermedia and computer networks: Three curricular innovations for teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(6), 543-551.
24. Laframboise, K. L., & Griffith, P. L. (1997). Using literature cases to examine diversity issues with preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 369-382.
25. Lampert, M., Heaton, R., & Ball, D. (1994). Using technology to support a new pedagogy of mathematics teacher education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 276-289.
26. Lundeberg, M. A. Levin, B. B., & Harrington, H. L. (1999). Reflections on methodologies and future research. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how?: The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 231-240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
27. Macromedia. (2001). SoundForge [Computer software]. San Francisco: Author.
28. Macromedia. (2002). Flash MX™ [Computer software]. San Francisco: Author.
29. Moreno, R. (2005). Instructional technology: Promise and pitfalls. In L. Pytlikzillig, M. Bodvarsson, & R. Bruning (Eds.), Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 1-19). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
30. Moreno, R., & Valdez, A. (in press). Immediate and delayed learning effects of presenting classroom cases in teacher education: Are video cases or case narratives more effective? Journal of Educational Psychology.
31. Moroney, W. F., & Moroney, B. W. (1999). Flight simulation. In D. J. Garland, J. A. Wise, & V. D. Hopkin (Eds.), Handbook of aviation human factors (pp. 355-388). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Ormrod, J. E. (2004). Educational psychology: developing learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Ormrod, J. E. (Producer). (2003a). Climate, geography, and economics in junior high social studies [Motion picture]. (Available from Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458).
34. Ormrod, J. E. (Producer). (2003b). Essential teaching skills [Motion picture]. (Available from Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458).
35. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Motivation and classroom learning. In W. M. Reynolds, G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (pp. 103-122). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
36. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
37. Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (Eds.). (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 629-639.
39. Schank, R. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge University Press.
40. Schank, R. (1997). Virtual learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
41. Sears, S. J., & Hersh, S. B. (1998). Contextual teaching and learning: An overview of the project. In Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing teachers to enhance student success in the workplace and beyond. Information Series No. 376. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education Center on Education and Training for Employment.
42. Shulman, J. H. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
43. Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50, 25-28.
45. Tulving, E. (1977). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving, W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381-403). New York: Academic Press.
46. Valmont, W. J. (1995). Creating videos for school use. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
47. Van den Berg, E., Jansen, L., & Blijleven, P. (2004). Learning with multimedia cases: An evaluation study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(4), 491-509.
48. Wetzel, C. D., Radtke, P. H., & Stern, H. W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
50. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
51. Wilkerson, L., & Gijselaers, W. H. (1996). Bridging problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
52. Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367-427.
53. Williams, S. M., & Hmelo, C. E. (Eds.) (1998). Special Issue: Learning through problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7.
54. Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational psychology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
55. Zeichner, K. M. (1999). Commentary on "Researching case pedagogies". In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how?: The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 95-97). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.