Optimizing glenoid component position using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 637-641

  Hoenecke Jr , Heinz R ^a   Hermida, Juan C ^a   Dembitsky, Nicholas ^a   Patil, Shantanu ^a   D'Lima, Darryl D ^a  

^a SCRIPPS CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMPLANT; INCIDENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CADAVER; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SHOULDER JOINT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 46049089095     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.021     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bohsali K.I., Wirth M.A., and Rockwood Jr. C.A. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 (2006) 2279-2292
2. Checroun A.J., Hawkins C., Kummer F.J., and Zuckerman J.D. Fit of current glenoid component designs: an anatomic cadaver study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 (2002) 614-617
3. Farmer K.W., Hammond J.W., Queale W.S., Keyurapan E., and McFarland E.G. Shoulder arthroplasty versus hip and knee arthroplasties: a comparison of outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2007) 183-189
4. Friedman R.J., Hawthorne K.B., and Genez B.M. The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74 (1992) 1032-1037
5. Gregory T., Hansen U., Emery R.J., Augereau B., and Amis A.A. Developments in shoulder arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 221 (2007) 87-96
6. Hopkins A.R., Hansen U.N., Amis A.A., and Emery R. The effects of glenoid component alignment variations on cement mantle stresses in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13 (2004) 668-675
7. Klepps S., Chiang A.S., Miller S., Jiang C.Y., Hazrati Y., and Flatow E.L. Incidence of early radiolucent glenoid lines in patients having total shoulder replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2005) 118-125
8. Kwon Y.W., Powell K.A., Yum J.K., Brems J.J., and Iannotti J.P. Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14 (2005) 85-90
9. McGraw K.O., and Wong S.P. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1 (1996) 30-46
10. Nyffeler R.W., Sheikh R., Atkinson T.S., Jacob H.A., Favre P., and Gerber C. Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15 (2006) 625-629
11. Pearl M.L. Proximal humeral anatomy in shoulder arthroplasty: implications for prosthetic design and surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14 (2005) 99S-104S
12. van de Sande M.A., Brand R., and Rozing P.M. Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty. Scand J Rheumatol 35 (2006) 426-434
13. Walch G., Badet R., Boulahia A., and Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 14 (1999) 756-760